| Literature DB >> 27843971 |
Metin Nizamoglu1, Alethea Tan1, Tobias Vickers2, Nicholas Segaren1, David Barnes1, Peter Dziewulski1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guidance for the management of thermal injuries has evolved with improved understanding of burn pathophysiology. Guidance for the management of cold burn injuries is not widely available. The management of these burns differs from the standard management of thermal injuries. This study aimed to review the etiology and management of all cold burns presenting to a large regional burn centre in the UK and to provide a simplified management pathway for cold burns.Entities:
Keywords: Cold burn; Guideline; Survey; Treatment
Year: 2016 PMID: 27843971 PMCID: PMC5105282 DOI: 10.1186/s41038-016-0060-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Burns Trauma ISSN: 2321-3868
ACCP classification criteria for grading evidence in clinical guideline
| Grade | Description | Benefits vs. risks and burdens | Methodological quality of supporting evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Strong recommendations, high-quality evidence | Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens or vice versa | RCTs without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studies |
| 1B | Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence | Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens or vise versa | RCTs with important limitations or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studies |
| 1C | Strong recommendation, low-quality or very low-quality evidence | Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burdens or vise versa | Observational studies or case series |
| 2A | Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence | Benefits closely balanced with risks and burdens | RCTs without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studies |
| 2B | Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence | Benefits closely balanced with risks and burdens | RCTs with important limitations or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studies |
| 2C | Weak recommendation, low-quality or very low-quality evidence | Uncertainty in the estimates and burden; benefits, risks and burden may be closely balanced | Observational studies or case series |
ACCP American College of Chest Physicians, RCTs randomized controlled trials
Patient Demographics
| Variables | Total, n (%) |
|---|---|
| Patients | 23 (100 %) |
| Patient Age | |
| Median | 30 years |
| Range | 0.69 – 69 years |
| TBSA% | |
| Mean | 1.1 % |
| Range | 0.25 – 5 % |
| Depth | |
| Full thickness injury | 3 (13.0 %) |
| Partial thickness injury | 20 (87.0 %) |
| Cause | |
| Accidental | 17 (73.9 %) |
| Deliberate self-harm | 6 (26.1 %) |
| Mechanism | |
| Iatrogenic cryotherapy | 3 (13.0 %) |
| Contact | 5 (21.7 %) |
| Industrial | 4 (17.4 %) |
| Deodorant | 7 (30.4 %) |
| Dry Ice | 1 (4.3 %) |
| Environmental | 3 (13.0 %) |
| Management | |
| Conservative | 22 (95.7 %) |
| Surgical | 1 (4.4 %) |
| Healing Time | |
| Mean | 19 d |
| Range | 3-56 d |
TBSA% total body surface area %
Fig 1Anatomical location of cold burn injuries
Summary of survey
| Variables | n(%) |
|---|---|
| Total questionnaires | 200 |
| Responder | 52(26 %) |
| No response | 148(74 %) |
| Grades | |
| Consultants | 9 (17 %) |
| Registrars | 36 (69 %) |
| House Officers | 3 (6 %) |
| Nurses | 2 (4 %) |
| Undisclosed | 2 (4 %) |
| Competence managing injuries | |
| Felt competent | 37 (71 %) |
| Felt incompetent | 15 (29 %) |
| Use of clinical guidelines | |
| Yes | 18 (35 %) |
| No | 34 (65 %) |
| Type of guidelines used | |
| EMSB | 40 (77 %) |
| Others (SIGN, ATLS, NICE, Local Trust) | 12 (23 %) |
| Knowledge on available topical treatment | |
| Aware | 15 (29 %) |
| Unaware | 37 (71 %) |
| Opinion regarding need for further training | |
| Yes – Beneficial | 44 (85 %) |
| No | 8 (15 %) |
ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support Course, EMSB Emergency Management of Severe Burns, SIGN Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, NICE The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
A management pathway for cutaneous cold induced burns
| Intervention (level of evidence) | Reference |
|---|---|
| 1. First aid with warm water 37–39 °C for 30 min–1 h. (1B) | [ |
| 2. Analgesia including ibuprofen (prostaglandin inhibitor) unless contraindicated. (2C) | [ |
| 3. Escharotomy ± fasciotomy if clinical suspicion of compartment syndrome. (1C) | [ |
| 4. De-roofing of blisters (under general anaesthetic if indicated). (2C) | [ |
| 5. Aloe vera (antithromboxane) gel topically. (2C) | [ |
| 6. Elevation, splinting and barrier dressings. (2C) | [ |
| 7. Antibiotics if evidence of infection. (1C) | [ |
| 8. In severe frostbite wounds to extremities or digits, thrombolytic/prostacyclin therapy is to be considered. (1B) | [ |
| 9. Resurfacing of wound if indicated with skin graft ± skin substitute. (2C) | [ |