| Literature DB >> 27843173 |
Qian Zhao1, Wen-Ting Xu1, Tuluhong Shalieer1.
Abstract
Objective. In the current study, we measured the expression status of melanoma antigen gene c2 (MAGE-C2) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyzed its prognostic with the clinical pathological features of patients with TNBC. Methods. The expressions statuses of MAGE-C2 were detected in TNBC tissues and paracarcinoma tissues by immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and western blotting. Then, we investigated the relationship of MAGE-C2 expression status and clinicopathological parameters of TNBC patients by the chi-squared test. Finally, we discussed the relations of MAGE-C2 expression state and prognosis of patients with TNBC by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Results. High MAGE-C2 expression was found in 38.18% (42/110) of TNBC tissues. In adjacent tissues it was 9.09% (10/110). High MAGE-C2 expression in TNBC patients was closely associated with lymph node status, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001). TNBC patients with high MAGE-C2 expression had significantly shorter survival time than low expression patients. We also found that age, lymph node status, TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, and MAGE-C2 expression status were closely associated with overall survival of TNBC patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion. High MAGE-C2 expression may serve as an independent prognostic factor for TNBC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27843173 PMCID: PMC5098074 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2325987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1The MAGE-C2 protein expression in TNBC tissues and adjacent tissues detected by immunohistochemistry. (a and b) high MAGE-C2 protein expression in TNBC tissues; (c and d) low MAGE-C2 protein expression in TNBC tissues; (e and f) MAGE-C2 protein expression in adjacent tissues. Note: TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer.
Figure 2The MAGE-C2 protein was detected by western blotting. Note: A: adjacent tissues; T: triple-negative breast cancer tissues.
Figure 3The MAGE-C2 protein was detected by RT-PCR. Note: A: adjacent tissues; T: triple-negative breast cancer tissues; RT-PCR: reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
Associations between MAGE-C2 expression status and clinicopathologic parameters.
| Variable | MAGE-C2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression, | High expression, | ||
| Total | 68 (61.81) | 42 (38.18) | — |
| Median age, years (range) | 47 (22–79) | 46 (27–67) | 0.391 |
| Age, | 0.338 | ||
| ≤35 | 14 (20.59) | 12 (28.57) | |
| >35 | 54 (79.41) | 30 (71.43) | |
| Tumor size, | 0.292 | ||
| ≤2 cm | 19 (27.94) | 8 (19.05) | |
| >2 cm | 49 (72.06) | 34 (80.95) | |
| Lymph node status, | <0.001 | ||
| Negative | 48 (70.59) | 9 (21.43) | |
| Positive | 20 (29.41) | 33 (78.57) | |
| TNM stage, | <0.001 | ||
| I/II | 63 (92.65) | 14 (33.33) | |
| III | 5 (7.35) | 28 (66.67) | |
| Differentiation, | 0.792 | ||
| Well | 7 (10.29) | 6 (14.29) | |
| Moderate/poor | 61 (89.71) | 36 (85.71) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion, | <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 4 (5.88) | 21 (50.00) | |
| No | 64 (94.12) | 21 (50.00) | |
TNM (tumor node metastasis) staging was conducted on all breast cancer patients postoperatively in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 7th edition). The Miller and Payne grading system was used for determining differentiation of the neoplasms.
Figure 4The MAGE-C2 expression and prognosis of patients with TNBC by Kaplan-Meier method based on immunohistochemistry. (a) DFS; (b) OS; (c) disease recurrence-free survival. Note: DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer tissues.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of disease-free survival in 110 patients.
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Age, years (≤35 versus >35) | 0.408 | 0.202–0.821 | 0.012 | 0.367 | 0.174–0.773 | 0.008 |
| Tumor size, cm (≤2 versus >2) | 1.551 | 0.640–3.757 | 0.331 | 1.381 | 0.528–3.609 | 0.510 |
| Lymph node status (negative versus positive) | 5.096 | 2.207–11.768 | <0.001 | 3.274 | 1.229–8.723 | 0.018 |
| TNM stage (I/II versus II) | 2.975 | 1.498–5.909 | 0.002 | 1.574 | 0.547–4.528 | 0.400 |
| Differentiation (well versus moderate/poor) | 4.346 | 0.594–31.816 | 0.148 | 2.720 | 0.325–22.744 | 0.356 |
| Lymphovascular invasion (no versus yes) | 4.490 | 2.257–8.931 | <0.001 | 2.803 | 1.087–7.225 | 0.033 |
| MAGE-C2 expression (low versus high) | 2.170 | 1.092–4.311 | 0.027 | 1.513 | 1.168–3.567 | 0.041 |
Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in 110 patients.
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Age, years (≤35 versus >35) | 0.366 | 0.173–0.775 | 0.009 | 0.353 | 0.160–0.779 | 0.010 |
| Tumor size, cm (≤2 versus >2) | 1.565 | 0.595–4.118 | 0.364 | 1.392 | 0.491–3.945 | 0.534 |
| Lymph node status (negative versus positive) | 4.946 | 2.002–12.219 | 0.001 | 2.733 | 1.947–7.887 | 0.043 |
| TNM stage (I/II versus III) | 3.287 | 1.558–6.935 | 0.002 | 1.476 | 0.468–4.654 | 0.507 |
| Differentiation (well versus moderate/poor) | 3.595 | 0.488–26.465 | 0.209 | 2.413 | 0.280–20.766 | 0.423 |
| Lymphovascular invasion (no versus yes) | 4.875 | 2.310–10.287 | <0.001 | 2.730 | 1.964–7.725 | 0.049 |
| MAGE-C2 expression (low versus high) | 2.517 | 1.189–5.329 | 0.016 | 0.726 | 0.229–2.299 | 0.586 |