| Literature DB >> 27843134 |
Zhenhan Deng1, Yusheng Li1, Hong Liu2, Kanghua Li1, Guanghua Lei1, Bangbao Lu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) and the biomechanical and histological effects of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture on the lateral femoral condyle. MATERIAL AND METHODS Strain on different parts of the lateral femoral condyle from specimens of normal adult knee joints, including 12 intact PCLs, 6 ruptures of the anterolateral bundle, 6 ruptures of the postmedial bundle, and 12 complete ruptures, was tested when loaded with different loads on the knee at various flexion angles. Lateral femoral condyles were also collected randomly from both the experimental side in which the PCLs were transected and the control side from 4 sets of 12 matched-mode pairs of rabbits at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after surgery, and their BMD and morphological and histological changes were observed. RESULTS Partial and complete rupture of the PCL may cause an abnormal load on all parts of the lateral femoral condyle with any axial loading at all positions. Noticeable time-dependent degenerative histological changes of the lateral femoral condyle were observed in the rabbit model of PCL rupture. All of the PCL rupture groups had a higher expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) and collagen type II than the control group at all time points (P<0.05), but no significant difference in BMD (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Rupture of the PCL may trigger a coordinated response of lateral femoral condyle degeneration in a time-dependent manner, to which the high level of expression of MMP-7 and collagen type II could contribute.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27843134 PMCID: PMC5120644 DOI: 10.12659/msm.900502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The installment of strain gauges at anterior, middle, and posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle.
Strain in the anterior, middle, and posterior pats of the lateral femoral condyle in all groups under various loading conditions at different flexion angles (χ̄±s, μe).
| Flexion angles | Parts | Groups | 200 N | 400 N | 600 N | 800 N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0° | Anterior | PCL intact group | 24.72±2.30 | 34.42±1.93 | 44.37±1.85 | 49.64±2.28 |
| ALB rupture group | 26.17±1.41 | 34.53±1.21 | 45.43±1.41 | 52.17±1.72 | ||
| PMB rupture group | 27.63±1.63 | 39.67±1.87 | 47.21±1.86 | 57.87±1.47 | ||
| PCL rupture group | 28.23±3.56 | 40.55±2.41 | 49.64±1.85 | 61.17±2.44 | ||
| Middle | PCL intact group | −30.67±2.27 | −41.58±3.17 | −51.83±2.52 | −59.17±2.76 | |
| ALB rupture group | −31.17±2.32 | −41.67±2.16 | −53.00±1.79 | −64.00±3.41 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −32.50±2.74 | −47.67±2.80 | −59.00±2.83 | −69.33±1.75 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −33.83±2.51 | −47.92±3.12 | −59.92±3.12 | −72.92±2.07 | ||
| Posterior | PCL intact group | 18.91±3.45 | 22.33±3.42 | 28.00±3.16 | 28.58±2.27 | |
| ALB rupture group | 20.17±2.78 | 22.50±4.23 | 29.83±2.14 | 31.50±1.87 | ||
| PMB rupture group | 20.83±2.86 | 26.83±2.99 | 32.67±2.87 | 34.50±1.87 | ||
| PCL rupture group | 21.67±3.57 | 27.50±2.78 | 33.51±2.42 | 38.50±2.31 | ||
| 30° | Anterior | PCL intact group | −12.58±1.56 | −17.91±2.81 | −19.50±3.50 | −25.25±2.30 |
| ALB rupture group | −13.50±1.05 | −17.83±1.57 | −23.67±2.42 | −28.67±3.01 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −11.50±2.56 | −16.73±2.16 | −18.00±2.10 | −21.83±2.79 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −17.50±2.29 | −22.15±2.30 | −27.25±2.30 | −31.83±3.74 | ||
| Middle | PCL intact group | 50.33±2.47 | 57.33±2.46 | 62.17±2.46 | 69.58±2.07 | |
| ALB rupture group | −55.83±0.75 | −65.50±1.87 | 55.50±2.07 | −67.08±2.43 | ||
| PMB rupture group | 49.33±3.01 | 55.50±2.07 | 63.83±1.47 | 72.33±2.16 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −58.33±1.97 | −67.08±2.43 | −69.33±1.97 | −77.92±2.07 | ||
| Posterior | PCL intact group | −12.33±2.58 | −12.50±2.17 | −13.83±2.79 | −15.83±2.48 | |
| ALB rupture group | −28.50±2.88 | −34.17±1.47 | −38.50±3.08 | −40.67±1.86 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −12.50±1.62 | −13.67±2.57 | −14.42±3.15 | −22.75±2.56 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −28.83±3.32 | −34.58±2.35 | −40.50±2.47 | −49.83±3.51 | ||
| 60° | Anterior | PCL intact group | −14.67±2.53 | −24.17±3.46 | −33.67±3.60 | −44.75±2.80 |
| ALB rupture group | −15.17±1.47 | −22.17±1.47 | −24.50±2.43 | −31.17±2.64 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −14.67±2.16 | −21.83±2.79 | −31.67±1.75 | −40.33±3.01 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −14.67±2.53 | −24.83±4.59 | −27.75±3.62 | −37.67±4.52 | ||
| Middle | PCL intact group | −25.08±2.47 | −33.25±2.34 | −42.67±1.50 | −48.00±3.13 | |
| ALB rupture group | −29.33±2.16 | −35.67±1.63 | −49.17±1.47 | −55.67±1.50 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −26.17±1.47 | −32.00±1.78 | −42.83±2.32 | −52.17±1.48 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −31.33±2.35 | −37.25±2.34 | −51.58±1.56 | −61.83±2.82 | ||
| Posterior | PCL intact group | −12.67±1.21 | −18.50±2.43 | −21.00±2.37 | −29.33±1.86 | |
| ALB rupture group | −32.33±1.37 | −36.83±2.14 | −45.67±2.07 | −45.67±3.77 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −13.58±2.15 | −19.92±4.23 | −23.58±2.15 | −33.67±3.05 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −33.75±2.56 | −38.83±2.51 | −48.67±3.25 | −51.75±2.56 | ||
| 90° | Anterior | PCL intact group | −26.33±3.67 | −38.42±4.50 | −48.33±3.03 | −56.17±5.02 |
| ALB rupture group | −20.00±4.65 | −23.67±2.88 | −28.50±2.07 | −33.83±2.79 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −19.67±2.16 | −34.33±2.16 | −42.83±1.47 | −52.17±3.19 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −26.25±4.29 | −28.75±4.41 | −31.92±3.55 | −39.25±2.45 | ||
| Middle | PCL intact group | −23.17±2.76 | −28.67±2.57 | −32.33±1.50 | −36.50±2.65 | |
| ALB rupture group | −29.50±1.87 | −37.50±1.87 | −42.50±3.02 | −47.67±2.16 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −25.83±1.47 | −32.17±1.47 | −38.17±2.32 | −43.33±1.51 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −33.50±2.32 | −40.3±2.42 | −47.75±1.48 | −54.92±2.39 | ||
| Posterior | PCL intact group | −12.50±1.87 | −20.83±1.47 | −22.50±2.67 | −29.00±2.19 | |
| ALB rupture group | −26.33±1.97 | −38.33±2.06 | −40.67±3.88 | −48.33±4.46 | ||
| PMB rupture group | −19.83±4.24 | −25.83±4.23 | −29.41±5.12 | −34.41±2.61 | ||
| PCL rupture group | −39.41±2.47 | −43.33±2.99 | −46.96±5.03 | −57.67±2.31 |
μɛ – micro-strain; PCL – posterior cruciate ligament; ALB – anterolateral band; PMB – posteromedial band.
P<0.05 compared with PCL intact;
P<0.05 compared with ALB rupture;
P<0.05 compared with PMB rupture;
Dunnett T3 test, others SNK-q test.
Morphological characteristics of lateral femoral condyle between control group and PCL rupture group.
| Control group | PCL rupture group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All time points | 4th week | 8th week | 16th week | 24th week | |
| Structural integrity | Integrated | Integrated | Integrated | Worn free edge | Ulcer |
| Surface | Smooth | Smooth | Not smooth | Rough | Rough |
| Color | Bright white | Light blue | Faint yellow | Grey-yellow | Yellow |
| Elasticity | Good | Good | Slight slack | Slack | Slack |
Figure 2The images were visualized with macro-observation (first row), HE staining (second row), MMP-7 immunohistochemical staining (third row), and collagen type II immunohistochemical staining (fourth row) in PCL rupture side and the control side of the lateral femoral condyle. (A) the control side: continuous and smooth surface, chondrocytes in columnar shape and regularly ranged, even nuclear size and staining, mild deep staining in cytoplasm, continuous tidemark; weakly MMP-7 positive-staining expressed in superficial layer, few in cytoplasm; even collagen type II expression in ECM, few positive-staining cells, and almost no staining in cytoplasm; (B) 4th week after PCL rupture: smooth and approximately flat surface, chondrocytes regularly arranged, clear tissue layers, even HE staining, and continuous tidemark; MMP-7 positive-staining weakly expressed in surface, matrix, and cytoplasm, full oval-shaped nuclear, partly expressed in cytoplasm; uneven collagen type II positive-staining in matrix, partly expressed in cytoplasm; (C) 8th week after PCL rupture: slight rough surface, chondrocytes arranged disorderly, few gathered in clusters, unclear layers, uneven staining; MMP-7 strongly expressed in superficial layer, positive in matrix and cytoplasm, deeper than 4th week; more collagen type II positive-staining cells; (D) 16th week after PCL rupture: rough surface, chondrocytes arranged disorderly, more clusters, disorderly arrangement tissue layers; MMP-7 strongly expressed in superficial layer, matrix and cytoplasm, matrix partly degraded, cytomorphosis; more collagen type II positive-staining cells; (E) 24th week after PCL rupture: superficial layer fibrosis, cell number decreased obviously, layers disorderly arranged; decreased MMP-7 staining, especially in cytoplasm, matrix degradation, uneven cell size and shape; few collagen type II positive-staining cells.
Comparison of Mankin scores (χ̄±s), BMD(χ̄±s), MMP-7 (χ̄±s, %) and collagen type II expression rate (χ̄±s, %) in lateral femoral condyle at all time points between PCL rupture group and control group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
| 4th week | 8th week | 16th week | 24th week | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mankin Score | PCL rupture group | 1.42±0.52 | 3.59±1.16 | 6.08±1.73 | 8.25±0.62 |
| Control group | 0.62±0.52 | 0.60±0.52 | 0.67±0.65 | 0.75±0.62 | |
| P value | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | |
| BMD | PCL rupture group | 0.25±0.03 | 0.31±0.06 | 0.32±0.04 | 0.40±0.08 |
| Control group | 0.30±0.12 | 0.31±0.07 | 0.32±0.13 | 0.35±0.05 | |
| P value | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
| MMP-7 | PCL rupture group | 9.18±1.11 | 9.50±1.35 | 9.50±1.41 | 10.19±1.77 |
| Control group | 15.89±1.42 | 35.18±4.22 | 51.08±3.59 | 51.93±3.21 | |
| P value | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | |
| Collagen type II | PCL rupture group | 15.58±1.37 | 15.92±1.61 | 14.81±1.44 | 14.88±1.67 |
| Control group | 20.95±2.19 | 25.38±2.46 | 14.75±2.17 | 10.19±1.45 | |
| P value | <0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | |
BMD – bone mineral density; PCL – posterior cruciate ligament. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. P value of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically different.
Pairwise comparison of Mankin scores, BMD, MMP-7, and collagen type II expression rate in lateral femoral condyle at various time points between PCL rupture group and control group (P value).
| 4 W: 8 W | 4 W: 16 W | 4 W: 24 W | 8 W: 16 W | 8 W: 24 W | 16 W: 24 W | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mankin score | PCL rupture group | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
| Control group | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
| BMD | PCL rupture group | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 |
| Control group | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
| MMP-7 | PCL rupture group | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 |
| Control group | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
| Collagen type II | PCL rupture group | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
| Control group | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
BMD – bone mineral density; PCL – posterior cruciate ligament. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to show statistically significant differences. Dunnett T3 test, others Nemenyi rank test.