Literature DB >> 27843039

The Direct Anterior Approach is Associated With Early Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Shuichi Eto1, Katherine Hwang2, James I Huddleston2, Derek F Amanatullah2, William J Maloney2, Stuart B Goodman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has generated increased interest recently. The purpose of this study was to compare the duration to failure and reasons for revision of primary THA performed elsewhere and subsequently revised at our institution after the direct anterior vs other nonanterior surgical approaches to the hip.
METHODS: All primary THAs performed elsewhere and referred to our institution for revision were divided into the direct anterior approach (30 cases) or nonanterior approach groups (100 cases, randomly selected from 453 cases) based on the original surgical approach. Because all primary direct anterior THAs were originally performed after 2004 to eliminate temporal bias, we identified a subset of the nonanterior group in which the primary THA was performed after 2004 (known as the recent nonanterior group, 100 cases, randomly selected from 169 available cases).
RESULTS: The mean duration from primary to revision THA was 3.0 ± 2.7 years (direct anterior approach), 12.0 ± 8.8 years (nonanterior approach), and 3.6 ± 2.8 years (recent nonanterior), respectively. There was a significant difference in time to revision between the direct anterior and nonanterior approach groups (P < .001). Aseptic loosening of the stem was significantly more frequent with the direct anterior approach group (9/30, 30.0%) when compared with the nonanterior group (8/100, 8.0%, P = .007) and the recent nonanterior group (7/100, 7.0%, P = .002).
CONCLUSION: Revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening is more commonly associated with the direct anterior approach in our referral practice.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterolateral approach; direct anterior approach; hip arthroplasty; posterior approach; revision; surgical approach

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27843039     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  24 in total

1.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  CORR Insights®: No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?

Authors:  Loes Janssen; Karolina A P Wijnands; Dennis Janssen; Michiel W H E Janssen; Jan W Morrenhof
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?

Authors:  Knut Erik Mjaaland; Kjetil Kivle; Svein Svenningsen; Lars Nordsletten
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Non-cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach.

Authors:  Zachary Berliner; Cameron Yau; Kenneth Jahng; Marcel A Bas; H John Cooper; José A Rodriguez
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty with anatomic-shaped implants. Does the minimal invasive anterolateral technique influence the stem position or subsidence in contrast to the standard lateral approach?

Authors:  Nils Wirries; Marcus Örgel; Michael Schwarze; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen; Michael Skutek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Good long-term outcomes for Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty in South Africa.

Authors:  Jurek Rafal Tomasz Pietrzak; Zia Maharaj; Josip Nenad Cakic
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-28

8.  Influence of surgical approach on final outcome in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients older than 80 years.

Authors:  Takahito Yuasa; Hironobu Sato; Motoshi Gomi; Arihisa Shimura; Katsuhiko Maezawa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-26

9.  Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: More than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Takahito Yuasa; Kohei Aoki; Motoshi Gomi; Kohei Shiota
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 10.  Factors Affecting Periprosthetic Bone Loss after Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Se-Won Lee; Weon-Yoo Kim; Joo-Hyoun Song; Jae-Hoon Kim; Hwan-Hee Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.