Literature DB >> 27843032

Volume of Lytic Vertebral Body Metastatic Disease Quantified Using Computed Tomography-Based Image Segmentation Predicts Fracture Risk After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Isabelle Thibault1, Cari M Whyne2, Stephanie Zhou3, Mikki Campbell3, Eshetu G Atenafu4, Sten Myrehaug3, Hany Soliman3, Young K Lee3, Hamid Ebrahimi2, Albert J M Yee5, Arjun Sahgal6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine a threshold of vertebral body (VB) osteolytic or osteoblastic tumor involvement that would predict vertebral compression fracture (VCF) risk after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), using volumetric image-segmentation software. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computational semiautomated skeletal metastasis segmentation process refined in our laboratory was applied to the pretreatment planning CT scan of 100 vertebral segments in 55 patients treated with spine SBRT. Each VB was segmented and the percentage of lytic and/or blastic disease by volume determined.
RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of VCF at 3 and 12 months was 14.1% and 17.3%, respectively. The median follow-up was 7.3 months (range, 0.6-67.6 months). In all, 56% of segments were determined lytic, 23% blastic, and 21% mixed, according to clinical radiologic determination. Within these 3 clinical cohorts, the segmentation-determined mean percentages of lytic and blastic tumor were 8.9% and 6.0%, 0.2% and 26.9%, and 3.4% and 15.8% by volume, respectively. On the basis of the entire cohort (n=100), a significant association was observed for the osteolytic percentage measures and the occurrence of VCF (P<.001) but not for the osteoblastic measures. The most significant lytic disease threshold was observed at ≥11.6% (odds ratio 37.4, 95% confidence interval 9.4-148.9). On multivariable analysis, ≥11.6% lytic disease (P<.001), baseline VCF (P<.001), and SBRT with ≥20 Gy per fraction (P=.014) were predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment lytic VB disease volumetric measures, independent of the blastic component, predict for SBRT-induced VCF. Larger-scale trials evaluating our software are planned to validate the results.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27843032     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Concepts in the Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Dylan Hoyt; Ivan Urits; Vwaire Orhurhu; Mariam Salisu Orhurhu; Jessica Callan; Jordan Powell; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Rachel J Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-03-20

2.  Bone density and fracture risk following SBRT for non-spine bone metastases.

Authors:  Yilin Cao; Gregory C Stachelek; Wei Fu; Daniel Y Song; Russell K Hales; K Ranh Voong; Jeffrey J Meyer; Harry Quon; Chen Hu; Kristin J Redmond
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) For Bone Metastases: Patient Selection And Perspectives.

Authors:  Mauro Loi; Joost J Nuyttens; Isacco Desideri; Daniela Greto; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Dallis Ferguson; Allison Clement; Mohammedayaz Rangrez; Michael Hardisty
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Stereotactic Spinal Radiosurgery and Delayed Vertebral Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jaden D Evans; Paul D Brown; Kenneth R Olivier
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.