| Literature DB >> 27842939 |
Esther M Beraha1, Elske Salemink1, Anna E Goudriaan2, Abraham Bakker3, David de Jong1, Natasha Smits4, Jan Willem Zwart4, Dick van Geest5, Pieter Bodewits6, Tom Schiphof5, Harma Defourny4, Mirjam van Tricht7, Wim van den Brink8, Reinout W Wiers9.
Abstract
Previous randomised placebo-controlled trials with low-to-medium doses of baclofen (30-60mg) showed inconsistent results, but case studies suggested a dose-response effect and positive outcomes in patients on high doses of baclofen (up to 270mg). Its prescription was temporary permitted for the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD) in France, and baclofen is now widely prescribed. Recently, a small RCT found a strong effect of a mean dose of 180mg baclofen. In the present study the efficacy and safety of high doses of baclofen was examined in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 151 patients were randomly assigned to either six weeks titration and ten weeks high-dose baclofen (N=58; up to 150mg), low-dose baclofen (N=31; 30mg), or placebo (N=62). The primary outcome measure was time to first relapse. Nine of the 58 patients (15.5%) in the high-dose group reached 150mg and the mean baclofen dose in this group was 93.6mg (SD=40.3). No differences between the survival distributions for the three groups were found in the time to first relapse during the ten-weeks high-dose phase (χ2=0.41; p=0.813) or the 16-weeks complete medication period (χ2=0.04; p=0.982). There were frequent dose-related adverse events in terms of fatigue, sleepiness, and dry mouth. One medication related serious adverse event occurred in the high-dose baclofen group. Neither low nor high doses of baclofen were effective in the treatment of AD. Adverse events were frequent, although generally mild and transient. Therefore, large-scale prescription of baclofen for the treatment of AD seems premature and should be reconsidered. Copyright ÂEntities:
Keywords: Alcohol dependence; High-dose baclofen; Randomised placebo-controlled trial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27842939 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.10.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ISSN: 0924-977X Impact factor: 4.600