Literature DB >> 27842923

Mean HEART scores for hospitalized chest pain patients are higher in more experienced providers.

Jeff Dubin1, Eric Kiechle1, Matt Wilson2, Christian Timbol1, Rahul Bhat1, Dave Milzman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HEART score has been validated as a predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in emergency department patients complaining of chest pain. Our objective was to determine the extent of physician variation in the HEART score of admitted patients stratified by years of experience.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review at an academic tertiary care emergency department to determine HEART score, outcome of hospitalization, and 30-day MACE. Electrocardiograms were graded by consensus between 3 physicians. We used analysis of variance to determine the difference in mean HEART scores between providers, Fisher's exact test to determine difference in MACE by duration of training, and logistic regression to determine predictors of low-risk admission (HEART score≤3).
RESULTS: The average mean HEART score for 19 full-time physicians was 4.41 (SD 0.43). Individually, there was no difference in mean scores (P=.070), but physicians with 10-15 years of experience had significantly higher mean scores than those with 0-5 years of experience (mean HEART score 4.65 vs 3.93, P=.012). Those with 10-15 years of experience also had a significantly higher proportion of MACE in their admitted cohort (15.3%, P=.002).
CONCLUSIONS: More experienced providers admitted higher-risk patients and were more likely to admit patients who would experience a MACE. More research is needed to determine whether adding the HEART score for clinical decision making can be used prospectively to increase sensitivity for admitting patients at high risk for MACE and to decrease admissions for chest pain in lower-risk patients by less experienced providers.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27842923     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Moumneh; Vanessa Richard-Jourjon; Emilie Friou; Fabrice Prunier; Caroline Soulie-Chavignon; Jacques Choukroun; Betty Mazet-Guilaumé; Jérémie Riou; Andréa Penaloza; Pierre-Marie Roy
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  A combined care model using early access to specialists off-hours to reduce cardiac admissions.

Authors:  Michael Gavin; Bruce Landon; Jonathan Lu; Leila Ganjehei; Kalon Ho; Larry Nathanson; Edward Ullman; Shamai Grossman; Peter Zimetbaum
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  The HEART score: A guide to its application in the emergency department.

Authors:  William Brady; Katya de Souza
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-14

4.  Potential impact of cardiology phone-consultation for patients risk-stratified by the HEART pathway.

Authors:  Ken Monahan; Margaret Pan; Chinonso Opara; Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Daniel Munoz; Benjamin B Holmes; Davis Stephen; Kristopher J Swiger; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.