BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal placement of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products, Sylmar, CA) is critical. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows for intrasurgical visualization and confirmation of array placement. In this study, two different OCT systems were evaluated to assess the feasibility and utility of this technology during Argus II surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraoperative OCT was performed on five patients undergoing Argus II implantation at Cole Eye Institute from June 2015 to July 2016. The EnVisu portable OCT (Bioptigen, Morrisville, NC) and microscope-integrated RESCAN 700 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) intraoperative OCT systems were utilized. The EnVisu was used in three patients and the RESCAN 700 in three of the five patients. Following array tacking, intraoperative OCT was performed over the entire array including the edges and tack. RESULTS: Intraoperative OCT allowed for visualization of the array/retina interface. Microscope integration of the OCT system facilitated ease of focusing, real-time feedback, surgeon-directed OCT scanning to the areas of interest, and enhanced image quality at points of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative imaging of the Argus II electrode array is feasible and provides information about electrode array-retina interface and distance to help guide a surgeon. Microscope integration of OCT appears to provide an optimal and efficient approach to intraoperative OCT during Argus II array placement. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:999-1003.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal placement of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products, Sylmar, CA) is critical. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows for intrasurgical visualization and confirmation of array placement. In this study, two different OCT systems were evaluated to assess the feasibility and utility of this technology during Argus II surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraoperative OCT was performed on five patients undergoing Argus II implantation at Cole Eye Institute from June 2015 to July 2016. The EnVisu portable OCT (Bioptigen, Morrisville, NC) and microscope-integrated RESCAN 700 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) intraoperative OCT systems were utilized. The EnVisu was used in three patients and the RESCAN 700 in three of the five patients. Following array tacking, intraoperative OCT was performed over the entire array including the edges and tack. RESULTS: Intraoperative OCT allowed for visualization of the array/retina interface. Microscope integration of the OCT system facilitated ease of focusing, real-time feedback, surgeon-directed OCT scanning to the areas of interest, and enhanced image quality at points of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative imaging of the Argus II electrode array is feasible and provides information about electrode array-retina interface and distance to help guide a surgeon. Microscope integration of OCT appears to provide an optimal and efficient approach to intraoperative OCT during Argus II array placement. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:999-1003.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.
Authors: Devon H Ghodasra; Adrienne Chen; J Fernando Arevalo; David G Birch; Kari Branham; Brian Coley; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan; Robert G Devenyi; Jessy D Dorn; Andy Fisher; Duane R Geruschat; Ninel Z Gregori; Robert J Greenberg; Paul Hahn; Allen C Ho; Ashley Howson; Suber S Huang; Raymond Iezzi; Naheed Khan; Byron L Lam; Jennifer I Lim; Kirsten G Locke; Michelle Markowitz; Anne-Marie Ripley; Mark Rankin; Hannah Schimitzek; Fay Tripp; James D Weiland; Jiong Yan; David N Zacks; K Thiran Jayasundera Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Lan Yue; Paulo Falabella; Punita Christopher; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Jessy Dorn; Paulo Schor; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Justis P Ehlers; Jeff Goshe; William J Dupps; Peter K Kaiser; Rishi P Singh; Richard Gans; Jonathan Eisengart; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: A K Ahuja; J Yeoh; J D Dorn; A Caspi; V Wuyyuru; M J McMahon; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg; L Dacruz Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Justis P Ehlers; Yasha S Modi; Paula E Pecen; Jeff Goshe; William J Dupps; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; Sumit Sharma; Alex Yuan; Rishi Singh; Peter K Kaiser; Jamie L Reese; Carmen Calabrise; Allison Watts; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ninel Z Gregori; Natalia F Callaway; Catherine Hoeppner; Alex Yuan; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; William Feuer; Hossein Ameri; J Fernando Arevalo; Albert J Augustin; David G Birch; Gislin Dagnelie; Salvatore Grisanti; Janet L Davis; Paul Hahn; James T Handa; Allen C Ho; Suber S Huang; Mark S Humayun; Raymond Iezzi; K Thiran Jayasundera; Gregg T Kokame; Byron L Lam; Jennifer I Lim; Naresh Mandava; Sandra R Montezuma; Lisa Olmos de Koo; Peter Szurman; Lejla Vajzovic; Peter Wiedemann; James Weiland; Jiong Yan; David N Zacks Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Gavin S W Tan; Zengping Liu; Tanja Ilmarinen; Veluchamy A Barathi; Caroline K Chee; Gopal Lingam; Xinyi Su; Boris V Stanzel Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Thomas L Edwards; Charles L Cottriall; Kanmin Xue; Matthew P Simunovic; James D Ramsden; Eberhart Zrenner; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 12.079