| Literature DB >> 27841974 |
Yii-Jeng Lin1, Yen-Ying Kung1,2, Wen-Jui Kuo3,4, David M Niddam4,5, Chih-Che Chou4, Chou-Ming Cheng4, Tzu-Chen Yeh4,5, Jen-Chuen Hsieh4,5, Jen-Hwey Chiu1,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent functional MRI (fMRI) studies show that brain activity, including the default mode network (DMN), can be modulated by acupuncture. Conventional means to enhance the neurophysiological 'dose' of acupuncture, including an increased number of needles and manual needle manipulation, are expected to enhance its physiological effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of both methods on brain activity.Entities:
Keywords: ACUPUNCTURE; NEUROLOGY
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27841974 PMCID: PMC5256125 DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acupunct Med ISSN: 0964-5284 Impact factor: 2.267
Figure 1(A) Schematic representation of experimental protocols for three needle acupuncture (TNA), single needle acupuncture (SNA) with or without manual stimulation (MS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Vertical black lines indicate needles. Ovals indicate acupuncture points, with the middle one representing LI4. The black circle with an arrow indicates MS. ‘∼’ indicates TENS. (B) Photograph of participant receiving TNA. (C) In TNA and SNA groups, needles were retained for 15 mins. (D) In SNA+MS and TENS groups, nine blocks of manipulation/stimulation were applied. In all groups, three fMRI scans were acquired, specifically a first scan (session 1) that was carried out before treatment, a second scan (session 2) that was carried out 9 min into treatment, and a third scan (session 3) after needle or electrode removal.
Figure 2Subjective sensations during three needle acupuncture (TNA), single needle acupuncture (SNA) with or without manual stimulation (MS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The sensations experienced during mechanical or electrical stimulation were reported using a visual analogue scale rating from 0 to 100. Data are presented as mean±SD. *p<0.05: TENS versus TNA, SNA and SNA+MS groups (one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni post hoc test).
Default mode network-related brain regions exhibiting statistically significant changes in activity during acupuncture or TENS
| MNI (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | Hemisphere | x | y | z | Peak T value | Voxel numbers |
| TNA: during treatment effect | ||||||
| Calcarine | L | −24 | −66 | 12 | 6.08 | 312 |
| Posterior cingulate | L | −10 | −66 | 8 | 5.06 | |
| Insula | L | −44 | 12 | 14 | 6.74 | 193 |
| IFG | L | −42 | 18 | 6 | 4.74 | |
| MeFG | R | 12 | −24 | 56 | 5.42 | 16 |
| Insula | R | 44 | −10 | 4 | 4.85 | 15 |
| Precuneus | R | 22 | −74 | 18 | 4.77 | 16 |
| TNA: post-treatment effect | ||||||
| Cuneus | L | −16 | −82 | 18 | 5.68 | |
| MiOG | R | 32 | −72 | 14 | 4.82 | |
| Precuneus | R | 26 | −74 | 16 | 4.77 | 1799 |
| Precuneus | L | −26 | −78 | 16 | 4.71 | |
| Cuneus | R | 10 | −74 | 4 | 4.01 | |
| Precentral gyrus | R | 44 | 4 | 10 | 4.84 | 34 |
| Precentral gyrus | L | −48 | −2 | 10 | 4.14 | 11 |
| MiOG | L | −36 | −82 | 6 | 4.65 | 76 |
| Corpus callosum | R | 2 | −30 | 10 | −6.55 | 91 |
| Precuneus | R | 6 | −66 | 38 | −4.80 | 44 |
| SNA: during treatment effect | ||||||
| Limbic lobe | R | 20 | 4 | 36 | 5.05 | 21 |
| SG-FL | R | 20 | 4 | 38 | 6.06 | |
| Limbic lobe | R | 30 | 2 | 20 | 5.34 | 12 |
| Precentral gyrus | R | 66 | 0 | 34 | 4.01 | 20 |
| Uncus | R | 18 | 6 | −34 | 5.1 | 19 |
| MeFG | L | −14 | 0 | 54 | 4.77 | 13 |
| MiOG | L | −32 | −94 | 2 | 4.46 | 21 |
| Insula | L | −30 | −10 | 16 | 4.46 | 14 |
| SNA+MS: post-treatment effect | ||||||
| Lateral FOG | L | −34 | 44 | −16 | 6.07 | 15 |
| Superior TG | L | −44 | 8 | −14 | 5.68 | 49 |
| SMA | R | 14 | −10 | 64 | 5.6 | 36 |
| Insula | R | 40 | 6 | 12 | 5.22 | 146 |
| Superior TG | L | −66 | −42 | 16 | 3.53 | 13 |
| Lentiform nucleus | L | −18 | −6 | −4 | 3.5 | 14 |
| TENS: during treatment effect | ||||||
| SG-FL | R | 24 | 22 | −12 | 5.75 | 55 |
| IFG | R | 30 | 36 | −10 | 4.84 | |
| MeFG | R | 18 | 4 | 52 | 5.07 | 12 |
| SG-FL | L | −30 | 4 | 36 | −5.33 | 18 |
| TENS: post-treatment effect | ||||||
| IPL | R | 52 | −26 | 28 | 5.22 | 58 |
| IPL | L | −44 | −40 | 26 | 4.46 | 16 |
| Precuneus | R | 20 | −64 | 42 | 4.35 | 14 |
| SG-FL | R | 22 | −42 | 28 | −4.67 | 26 |
The ‘during treatment’ and ‘post-treatment’ effects were derived from the subtraction of images from session 1 and 2, and 1 and 3, respectively. p<0.001 (uncorrected) and voxel numbers >10. The MNI coordinates and peak T values were taken from the voxel with maximal signal change for each structure.
FOG, frontal-orbital gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; MeFG, medial frontal gyrus; MiOG, middle occipital gyrus; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; SG-FL, subgyrus of frontal lobe; SMA, supplementary motor area; SNA, single needle acupuncture; SNA+MS, single needle acupuncture with manual stimulation; TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; TG, temporal gyrus; TNA, three needle acupuncture.
Figure 3Comparison of default mode network (DMN)-related activity during and post-treatment with acupuncture or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). (A) Images demonstrating areas of increased DMN-related activity associated with the different treatment modalities. (B) Increased right insula activity observed as post-treatment effect in SNA+MS group. (C) Increased left insula activity observed as during treatment effect in TNA group. ‘During treatment’ and ‘post-treatment’ effects were derived from the subtraction of images from session 1 and 2, and 1 and 3, respectively. Data were analysed statistically by paired t-test. The threshold was set at p=0.001 (uncorrected) with a cluster extent threshold of 10 voxels. FOG, frontal-orbital gyrus; IPG, inferior parietal gyrus; MiOG, middle occipital gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area.