Literature DB >> 27841930

Variation in Optimal Sagittal Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Brandon Hood, Laura Blum, Sven A Holcombe, Stewart C Wang, Andrew G Urquhart, James A Goulet, Joseph D Maratt.   

Abstract

Accurate sagittal alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for prosthesis longevity, improved function, and patient satisfaction. However, there is variation in the techniques used to attain optimal sagittal femoral component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Femoral component flexion in imageless navigation is based on the mechanical axis rather than the distal femoral anatomy, and there is significant variability in the anatomy of the distal femur. The purpose of this study was to accurately determine the mean distal femoral flexion angle of a representative population and whether variability of the distal femoral flexion angle correlates with race, femur length, or radius of curvature. The mean degree of distal femoral flexion was determined by assessing distal femoral anatomy on computed tomography scans of paired femurs of 1235 patients without evidence of previous fracture, deformity, or surgical implants. The mean±SD distal femoral flexion angle was 2.90°±1.52°, with 80.2% of knees within 3°±2°. Therefore, placing the component in 3° of flexion from the mechanical axis would attain a satisfactory position in most cases. However, further analysis of the patient data revealed 11.4% of Asians, 7.3% of African Americans, and 8.3% of whites had a distal femoral flexion angle greater than 5°. Additionally, the data revealed a moderately strong negative correlation between the distal femoral flexion and the overall radius of curvature of the femur. This preliminary study highlights the need for improved methods for selecting femoral component position in the sagittal plane when using navigation for total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):102-106.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27841930     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20161108-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Is the femoral component flexion affected by the sagittal femoral shaft bowing in conventional intramedullary guided TKA?

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhang; Qianjin Wang; Xingquan Xu; Dongyang Chen; Zhengyuan Bao; Yao Yao; Dengxian Wu; Bin Wang; Zhihong Xu; Qing Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Optimal Flexion for the Femoral Component in TKR: A Study of Angle Between Mechanical Axis and Distal Anatomic Intramedullary Axis Using 3D Reconstructed CT Scans in 407 Osteoarthritic Knees Studied in India.

Authors:  Manish R Shah; Jil P Patel; Chirag R Patel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty : mechanical, kinematic, anatomical, and functional alignment.

Authors:  Fahima A Begum; Babar Kayani; Ahmed A Magan; Justin S Chang; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06

4.  Flexible versus standard intramedullary rod in posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasty: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M R Bénard; R F M van Doremalen; A B Wymenga; P J C Heesterbeek
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.