| Literature DB >> 27841332 |
Zaijun Zhang1, Gaoxiao Zhang1, Yewei Sun1, Samuel S W Szeto2, Henry C H Law2, Quan Quan2, Guohui Li2, Pei Yu1, Eiketsu Sho3, Michael K W Siu4, Simon M Y Lee5, Ivan K Chu2, Yuqiang Wang1.
Abstract
TBN, a novel tetramethylpyrazine derivative armed with a powerful free radical-scavenging nitrone moiety, has been reported to reduce cerebral infarction in rats through multi-functional mechanisms of action. Here we study the therapeutic effects of TBN on non-human primate model of stroke. Thirty male Cynomolgus macaques were subjected to stroke with 4 hours ischemia and then reperfusion. TBN were injected intravenously at 3 or 6 hours after the onset of ischemia. Cerebral infarction was examined by magnetic resonance imaging at 1 and 4 weeks post ischemia. Neurological severity scores were evaluated during 4 weeks observation. At the end of experiment, protein markers associated with the stroke injury and TBN treatment were screened by quantitative proteomics. We found that TBN readily penetrated the blood brain barrier and reached effective therapeutic concentration after intravenous administration. It significantly reduced brain infarction and modestly preserved the neurological function of stroke-affected arm. TBN suppressed over-expression of neuroinflammatory marker vimentin and decreased the numbers of GFAP-positive cells, while reversed down-regulation of myelination-associated protein 2', 3'-cyclic-nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase and increased the numbers of NeuN-positive cells in the ipsilateral peri-infarct area. TBN may serve as a promising new clinical candidate for the treatment of ischemic stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27841332 PMCID: PMC5107909 DOI: 10.1038/srep37148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1TBN attenuates brain infarct volume and improves neurological function in monkeys subjected to t-MCAo.
(A) Representative images of T-weighted MRI scan. (B,C) Brain infarct size of ipsilateral hemisphere. Data were expressed as dot plots with means in the left panel and mean ± s.e.m. in the right panel (n = 6 for each group). (D) Success rate of food catching of the contralateral, stroke-affected hand. Data were expressed as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 6 for each group). ‘@3 h’ and ‘@6 h’ mean TBN treatment initiating at 3 h and 6 h post-ischemia.
Neurological deficit scores of stroke monkeys at 1 and 4 weeks post-surgery.
| 1 week | 4 weeks | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total neurological deficit (0–77) | Consciousness (0–29) | Sensory system (0–12) | Motor system (0–17) | Skeletal muscle coordination (0-19) | Successful times of right hand catching (0–15) | Total times of right hand catching (0–15) | Total neurological deficit (0–77) | Consciousness (0–29) | Sensory system (0–12) | Motor system (0–17) | Skeletal muscle coordination (0-19) | Successful times of right hand catching (0–15) | Total times of right hand catching (0–15) | |
| Model | 21.7 ± 4.1 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 1.7 | 7.0 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 15.5 ± 1.7 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 0.8 |
| 10 mg kg−1 @3 h | 20.7 ± 5.6 | 5.0 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 1.8 | 6.0 ± 2.0 | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 7.5 ± 2.6 | 8.0 ± 2.4 | 11.5 ± 2.3 | 2.7 ± 0.8* | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0 | 7.5 ± 3.4* | 10.0 ± 2.5* |
| 30 mg kg−1 @3 h | 18.7 ± 3.4 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 2 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | 8.8 ± 2.6* | 10.7 ± 2.6* | 14.0 ± 1.6 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 2.4* | 9.0 ± 2.4* |
| 90 mg kg−1 @3 h | 19.3 ± 2.6 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 3 ± 0.8 | 5.0 ± 1.0 | 6.0 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 1.8 | 7.8 ± 3.2 | 11.3 ± 2.8 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.3 ± 1.0 | 6.2 ± 2.9 | 7.0 ± 3.0 |
| 90 mg kg−1 @6 h | 17.3 ± 1.5 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 5.0 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 6.3 ± 2.3 | 11.7 ± 2.3* | 14.0 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0 | 2 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ±0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 9.8 ± 2.4* | 11.5 ± 1.9* |
*P < 0.05 versus Model. Data at 1 and 4 weeks were separately analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ‘@3 h’ and ‘@6 h’ meant TBN treatment initiating at 3 h and 6 h post-ischemia.
Figure 2TBN readily penetrates the blood-brain barrier and reaches neuroprotective concentrations.
(A,B) Blood and brain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations vs. time profile after drug administration. (C) TBN protects primary cortical neurons against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity. #P < 0.05 versus control (Ctrl); **P < 0.01 versus glutamate treatment alone. Data were from three independent experiments. (D) TBN attenuates OGD-induced LDH release in primary cortical neurons. #P < 0.05 versus control (Ctrl); *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus OGD alone. Data were from three independent experiments.
Figure 3Dysregulated proteins in quantitative proteomic analyses functionally annotate to cellular processes associated with the chronic phase of stroke.
(A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of dysregulated proteins for the stroke peri-infarct tissue versus the contralateral normal tissue and the TBN-treated peri-infarct tissue versus the contralateral normal tissue. (B) Dysregulated proteins functionally annotate to cellular processes of angiogenesis, neurogenesis, astrogenesis and inflammation.
Figure 4Molecular and cellular events involved in the protection of TBN against stroke injury.
(A) Representative immunoblots of monkey brain tissue. (B) Densitometric quantification of the immunoblots as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. #P < 0.05 verses contralateral (Cont); *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 verses ipsilateral (Ipsi) without TBN treatment. (C) Representative immunohistochemistry images of cortical sections. Scale bars, 50 μm. (D) Quantification of the number of NeuN and GFAP positive cells. Data were expressed as percentage of sham group (n = 5 for Contralateral; n = 4 Ipsilateral without TBN and n = 6 for Ipsilateral with TBN). ##P < 0.01 verses sham group; *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 verses model group.