Literature DB >> 27840702

Crystal structures of 6-chloro-indan-1-one and 6-bromo-indan-1-one exhibit different inter-molecular packing inter-actions.

Alessio Caruso1, Benjamin Blair1, Joseph M Tanski1.   

Abstract

The two title compounds are analogs of 1-indanone that are substituted at the 6-position with chlorine and bromine. Although very similar in mol-ecular structure, the crystal structures are not isomorphous and reveal that 6-chloro-indan-1-one, C9H7ClO (I), and 6-bromo-indan-1-one, C9H7BrO (II), exhibit unique inter-molecular packing motifs. The mol-ecules of the chloro analog (I) pack with a herringbone packing motif of C-H⋯O inter-actions, whereas the bromo derivative (II) packs with offset face-to-face π-stacking, C-H⋯O, C-H⋯Br and Br⋯O inter-actions. Compound (II) was refined as a two-component non-merohedral twin, BASF 0.0762 (5).

Entities:  

Keywords:  C—H⋯X inter­actions; crystal structure; haloindanones; π-stacking

Year:  2016        PMID: 27840702      PMCID: PMC5095827          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Halogenated derivatives of the common bicyclic organic framework 1-indanone have been shown to be useful in a variety of synthetic and biologically related applications (Ruiz et al., 2004 ▸). A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.31, September 2016 with updates; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) returns four simple aryl­halide substituted 1-indanones, although several more are commercially available. The title compounds represent two analogs of 6-haloindan-1-one that are notably not isomorphous. In addition, they are not isomorphous with the fluorine derivative 6-fluoro­indan-1-one, which is one of the four that has previously been reported (Slaw & Tanski, 2014 ▸). In the chloro analog, 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I), the mol­ecules pack together via a series of C—H⋯O inter­actions. C—H⋯X inter­actions are common and have been discussed in the literature (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999 ▸), as well as specifically in the case of 1-indanone itself (Ruiz et al., 2004 ▸). The bromo derivative 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) packs with offset face-to-face π-stacking (Hunter & Saunders, 1990 ▸; Lueckheide et al., 2013 ▸) and several different inter­molecular contacts including C—H⋯O, C—H⋯Br weak hydrogen bonds and Br⋯O inter­actions. The compounds 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I) and 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) may be synthesized by the microwave or ultrasound-aided ring closure of 4-chloro- or 4-bromo­benzene­propanoic acid, respectively, catalyzed by triflic acid in di­chloro­methane (Oliverio et al., 2014 ▸). 6-Haloindan-1-ones have featured in the synthesis of biologically or pharmacologically active compounds. In recent examples, 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I) has been employed in the total synthesis of the anti­cancer natural product chartarin (Unzner et al., 2016 ▸), and in the synthesis of triazole-quinoline derivatives that are acetyl­cholinesterase inhibitors relevant to the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (Mantoani et al., 2016 ▸). 6-Bromo­indan-1-one has been used as the starting material for the synthesis of small mol­ecules that inhibit cell entry by HIV-1 (Melillo et al., 2016 ▸), and both 6-chloro­indan-1-one and 6-bromo­indan-1-one have been used as the starting material for the preparation of C-7 substituted 3,4-di­hydro­isoquinolin-1(2H)-one analogues that selectively inhibit unique poly-ADP-ribose polymerases (Morgan et al., 2015 ▸).

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular features of 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I) (Fig. 1 ▸) and 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) (Fig. 2 ▸) are similar to those reported for the analogous structure 6-fluoro­indan-1-one (Slaw & Tanski, 2014 ▸), although the analogues are not isomorphous and exhibit different inter­molecular packing. In the chloro derivative (I), the aryl C—Cl bond length, 1.7435 (11) Å, is similar to that found in the isomeric compound 5-chloro­indan-1-one [C—Cl = 1.735 (2) Å; Ruiz et al., 2006 ▸]. The aryl CBr bond length in the bromo analog (II), 1.907 (3) Å, is similar to that found in the isomeric compound 4-bromo­indan-1-one [1.894 (1) Å; Aldeborgh et al., 2014 ▸]. The C=O bond lengths in 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I), 1.2200 (12) Å, and 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II), 1.216 (3) Å, are also very similar to those found in the other four reported structures of simple aryl­halide-substituted 1-indanones: 6-fluoro­indan-1-one, 1.2172 (13) Å (Slaw & Tanski, 2014 ▸); 5-fluoro­indan-1-one, 1.218 (2) Å (Garcia et al.,1995 ▸); 5-chloro­indan-1-one, 1.210 (3) Å (Ruiz et al., 2006 ▸); 4-bromo­indan-1-one, 1.215 (2) Å (Aldeborgh et al., 2014 ▸). These carbonyl C=O bond lengths are also similar to that found in the structure of the parent compound, 1-indanone, 1.217 (2) Å (Ruiz et al., 2004 ▸). With the exception of the methyl­ene hydrogen atoms, both (I) and (II) are nearly planar, with r.m.s. deviations from the mean planes of all non-H atoms of 0.0460 and 0.0107 Å, respectively.
Figure 1

A view of 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I) with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

Figure 2

A view of 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal structure of 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I), the mol­ecules pack together via van der Waals contacts, specifically C—H⋯O inter­actions, without any π-stacking. The C—H⋯O inter­actions (Fig. 3 ▸ and Table 1 ▸) connect the indanone oxygen atom with methyl­ene hydrogen atoms on neighboring mol­ecules into a two-mol­ecule-thick sheet parallel to the (100) plane (Fig. 4 ▸). These sheets further pack together without any notable inter­molecular contacts. The closest Cl⋯Cl contact between the sheets, 3.728 Å, is somewhat longer than the sum of the van der Waals radii of chlorine, 3.50 Å (Bondi, 1964 ▸).
Figure 3

A view of the inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts in 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I). See Table 1 ▸ for symmetry codes (i) and (ii). In this and subsequent figures the C—H⋯X inter­actions are shown as dashed lines.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2A⋯O1i 0.992.563.1933 (15)121
C2—H2B⋯O1ii 0.992.593.5448 (14)161

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Figure 4

A view of the sheet structure in 6-chloro­indan-1-one (I) formed by C—H⋯O contacts. See Table 1 ▸ for symmetry codes (i) and (ii).

The mol­ecular packing in the bromo analog, 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II), is distinct from that found in (I). The notable inter­molecular inter­actions observed include π-stacking, Br⋯O, C—H⋯O, and C—H⋯Br inter­actions. The offset face-to-face π-stacking can be seen to extend along the crystallographic c axis (Fig. 5 ▸), with the mol­ecules stacking in an alternating head-to-tail fashion featuring a C—H⋯Br inter­action with an H⋯Br distance of 3.05 Å (Fig. 5 ▸ and Table 2 ▸). The π-stacking is characterized by a centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.850 (3) Å, centroid-to-plane distances of 3.530 (2) and 3.603 (2) Å, and ring offsets of 1.358 (3) and 1.536 (3) Å that result in a plane-to-plane angle of 3.1 (1)°. The π-stacked chains of (II) are linked into a three-dimensional lattice by C—H⋯O inter­actions and a Br⋯O contact (Fig. 6 ▸ and Table 2 ▸). The Br⋯O contact, at a distance of 3.018 (2) Å, is slightly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii, 3.37 Å (Bondi 1964 ▸). This inter­action is even shorter than the Br⋯O contact in the isomeric 4-bromo­indan-1-one [3.129 (1) Å; Aldeborgh et al., 2014 ▸].
Figure 5

A view of the alternating offset face-to-face π-stacking and C—H⋯Br inter­action in 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) with the thick black line indicating a centroid-to-centroid inter­action. See Table 2 ▸ for symmetry code (iii).

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3B⋯O1i 0.992.453.408 (4)162
C5—H5A⋯O1ii 0.952.553.253 (4)131
C2—H2B⋯Br1iii 0.993.053.898 (3)145

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 6

A view of the inter­molecular C—H⋯O and Br⋯O contacts (dashed lines) in 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II). See Table 2 ▸ for symmetry codes (i) and (ii).

Database survey

A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database reveals that in addition to the two structures reported here, there are four other simple aryl­halide-substituted 1-indanone structures known. These include 6-fluoro­indan-1-one (Slaw & Tanski, 2014 ▸), 5-fluoro­indan-1-one (Garcia et al., 1995 ▸), 5-chloro­indan-1-one (Ruiz et al., 2006 ▸) and 4-bromo­indan-1-one (Aldeborgh et al., 2014 ▸). The crystal structure of 1-indanone itself was first reported in 1974 (Morin et al., 1974 ▸) and was later described in a more detailed structural and spectroscopic analysis (Ruiz et al., 2004 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

6-Chloro­indan-1-one (96%) and 6-bromo­indan-1-one (98%) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, USA, and were used as received.

Analytical data

6-Chloro­indan-1-one (I) 1H NMR (Bruker Avance 300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.72 (t, 2 H, J = 5.9 Hz, CH), 3.12 (t, 2H, J = 5.9 Hz, CH), 7.42 (d, 1 H, J = 8.2 Hz, Car­yl H), 7.53 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz, J = 8.1 Hz, Car­yl H), 7.69 (s, 1 H, Car­yl H). 13C NMR (13C{1H}, 75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.37 (CH2), 36.57 (CH2), 123.45 (C ar­ylH), 127.85 (C ar­ylH), 133.63 (C ar­yl), 134.50 (C ar­ylH), 138.49 (C ar­yl), 153.07 (C ar­yl), 205.43 (C=O). IR (Thermo Nicolet iS50, KBr pellet, cm−1): 3391 (w), 3076 (w), 3051 (w), 2964 (w), 2935 (w), 1702 (vs, C=O str), 1595 (w), 1576 (w), 1466 (m), 1435 (m), 1409 (m), 1318 (w), 1285 (w), 1276 (w), 1250 (m), 1214 (w), 1187 (m), 1173 (m), 1115 (m), 1037 (w), 895 (m), 854 (m), 836 (s), 815 (m), 678 (m), 623 (m), 561 (m), 518 (w), 484 (m). GC/MS (Hewlett-Packard MS 5975/GC 7890): M + = 166 (calculated exact mass 166.02). 6-Bromo­indan-1-one (II) 1H NMR (Bruker Avance 300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.71 (t, 2 H, J = 5.8 Hz, CH), 3.09 (t, 2H, J = 5.9 Hz, CH), 7.37 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz, Car­yl H), 7.65 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 8.1 Hz, Car­yl H), 7.83 (s, 1 H, Car­yl H). 13C NMR (13C{1H}, 75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.37 (CH2), 36.34 (CH2), 121.35 (C ar­yl), 126.46 (C ar­ylH), 128.16 (C ar­ylH), 137.14 (C ar­ylH), 138.73 (C ar­yl), 153.47 (C ar­yl), 205.19 (C=O). IR (Thermo Nicolet iS50, ATR, cm−1): 3394 (w), 3066 (w), 2962 (w), 2925 (w), 1698 (vs, C=O str), 1598 (w), 1577 (w), 1468 (w), 1438 (s), 1417 (w), 1398 (m), 1322 (w), 1295 (w), 1279 (w), 1253 (m), 1238 (m), 1213 (w), 1191 (s), 1171 (w), 1112 (m), 1038 (w), 978 (w), 887 (w), 829 (s), 668 (m), 609 (w), 557 (m), 509 (w), 478 (m). GC/MS (Hewlett-Packard MS 5975/GC 7890): M + = 210 (calculated exact mass 209.97).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. After indexing with Cell_Now (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), 6-bromo­indan-1-one (II) was refined as a two-component non-merohedral twin, BASF 0.0762 (5). Carbon-bound hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions and refined using a riding model at C—H = 0.95 and 0.99 Å and U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) of the aryl and methyl­ene C atoms, respectively.
Table 3

Experimental details

 (I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H7ClOC9H7BrO
M r 166.60211.06
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)125125
a, b, c (Å)16.319 (6), 6.024 (2), 7.745 (3)6.489 (2), 17.101 (6), 7.224 (3)
β (°)99.524 (5)102.964 (5)
V3)750.9 (5)781.2 (5)
Z 44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.445.19
Crystal size (mm)0.28 × 0.25 × 0.140.40 × 0.21 × 0.05
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCDBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)Multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker 2013)
T min, T max 0.84, 0.940.55, 0.78
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections18572, 2291, 21584453, 4453, 3600
R int 0.0270.046
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.7160.716
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.030, 0.083, 1.080.030, 0.152, 1.03
No. of reflections22914453
No. of parameters100101
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.47, −0.231.15, −1.15

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013 ▸), SHELXS and SHELXTL2014 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014/6 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I, II. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371/sj5508sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371/sj5508Isup2.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371/sj5508IIsup3.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371/sj5508Isup4.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016015371/sj5508IIsup5.cml CCDC references: 1507437, 1507436 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H7ClOF(000) = 344
Mr = 166.60Dx = 1.474 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.319 (6) ÅCell parameters from 9875 reflections
b = 6.024 (2) Åθ = 2.5–30.5°
c = 7.745 (3) ŵ = 0.44 mm1
β = 99.524 (5)°T = 125 K
V = 750.9 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.28 × 0.25 × 0.14 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2291 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2158 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.027
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 2.5°
φ and ω scansh = −23→23
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.84, Tmax = 0.94l = −11→11
18572 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.083w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0439P)2 + 0.2902P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2291 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.44180 (2)0.68505 (5)0.30384 (4)0.02625 (9)
O10.09308 (5)0.71579 (13)0.08199 (10)0.02037 (16)
C10.12100 (5)0.87485 (15)0.17008 (11)0.01444 (17)
C20.07137 (6)1.06661 (17)0.22843 (12)0.01704 (18)
H2A0.0351.01360.31020.02*
H2B0.03631.13630.12620.02*
C30.13555 (6)1.23410 (17)0.32015 (14)0.02079 (19)
H3A0.13281.37530.2540.025*
H3B0.12571.26530.44050.025*
C40.21867 (6)1.12199 (16)0.32313 (12)0.01535 (17)
C50.29771 (6)1.19687 (16)0.39740 (13)0.01873 (19)
H5A0.30461.33740.45360.022*
C60.36615 (6)1.06251 (17)0.38780 (13)0.01935 (19)
H6A0.42031.11140.43740.023*
C70.35530 (6)0.85462 (17)0.30482 (13)0.01715 (18)
C80.27767 (6)0.77850 (16)0.22694 (12)0.01593 (17)
H8A0.27080.63940.16850.019*
C90.21000 (5)0.91673 (15)0.23876 (11)0.01374 (17)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.01319 (12)0.03164 (15)0.03279 (15)0.00500 (8)0.00046 (9)−0.00599 (10)
O10.0170 (3)0.0196 (3)0.0230 (3)−0.0015 (3)−0.0012 (3)−0.0029 (3)
C10.0134 (4)0.0153 (4)0.0143 (4)0.0008 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0028 (3)
C20.0153 (4)0.0186 (4)0.0174 (4)0.0039 (3)0.0033 (3)0.0016 (3)
C30.0202 (4)0.0180 (4)0.0233 (4)0.0050 (4)0.0013 (4)−0.0045 (4)
C40.0174 (4)0.0145 (4)0.0138 (4)0.0008 (3)0.0017 (3)0.0006 (3)
C50.0211 (4)0.0158 (4)0.0181 (4)−0.0026 (3)−0.0001 (3)−0.0020 (3)
C60.0164 (4)0.0208 (4)0.0197 (4)−0.0041 (3)−0.0004 (3)−0.0003 (3)
C70.0124 (4)0.0203 (4)0.0184 (4)0.0012 (3)0.0014 (3)0.0000 (3)
C80.0138 (4)0.0161 (4)0.0175 (4)0.0007 (3)0.0015 (3)−0.0017 (3)
C90.0133 (4)0.0142 (4)0.0134 (4)0.0000 (3)0.0011 (3)0.0003 (3)
Cl1—C71.7435 (11)C4—C91.3947 (13)
O1—C11.2200 (12)C4—C51.3974 (14)
C1—C91.4834 (13)C5—C61.3913 (15)
C1—C21.5218 (13)C5—H5A0.95
C2—C31.5406 (15)C6—C71.4054 (14)
C2—H2A0.99C6—H6A0.95
C2—H2B0.99C7—C81.3880 (13)
C3—C41.5120 (14)C8—C91.3981 (13)
C3—H3A0.99C8—H8A0.95
C3—H3B0.99
O1—C1—C9125.95 (9)C5—C4—C3128.81 (9)
O1—C1—C2126.46 (9)C6—C5—C4119.00 (9)
C9—C1—C2107.58 (8)C6—C5—H5A120.5
C1—C2—C3106.23 (8)C4—C5—H5A120.5
C1—C2—H2A110.5C5—C6—C7120.09 (9)
C3—C2—H2A110.5C5—C6—H6A120.0
C1—C2—H2B110.5C7—C6—H6A120.0
C3—C2—H2B110.5C8—C7—C6122.01 (9)
H2A—C2—H2B108.7C8—C7—Cl1119.08 (8)
C4—C3—C2104.73 (8)C6—C7—Cl1118.90 (7)
C4—C3—H3A110.8C7—C8—C9116.67 (9)
C2—C3—H3A110.8C7—C8—H8A121.7
C4—C3—H3B110.8C9—C8—H8A121.7
C2—C3—H3B110.8C4—C9—C8122.60 (8)
H3A—C3—H3B108.9C4—C9—C1109.64 (8)
C9—C4—C5119.62 (9)C8—C9—C1127.76 (9)
C9—C4—C3111.57 (8)
O1—C1—C2—C3−174.57 (9)Cl1—C7—C8—C9177.06 (7)
C9—C1—C2—C35.05 (10)C5—C4—C9—C80.96 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C4−4.48 (10)C3—C4—C9—C8−178.67 (9)
C2—C3—C4—C92.39 (11)C5—C4—C9—C1−179.59 (8)
C2—C3—C4—C5−177.19 (9)C3—C4—C9—C10.78 (11)
C9—C4—C5—C6−1.02 (14)C7—C8—C9—C40.33 (14)
C3—C4—C5—C6178.54 (9)C7—C8—C9—C1−179.02 (9)
C4—C5—C6—C7−0.18 (15)O1—C1—C9—C4175.91 (9)
C5—C6—C7—C81.53 (15)C2—C1—C9—C4−3.71 (10)
C5—C6—C7—Cl1−177.11 (8)O1—C1—C9—C8−4.67 (15)
C6—C7—C8—C9−1.57 (14)C2—C1—C9—C8175.71 (9)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2A···O1i0.992.563.1933 (15)121
C2—H2B···O1ii0.992.593.5448 (14)161
C9H7BrOF(000) = 416
Mr = 211.06Dx = 1.794 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.489 (2) ÅCell parameters from 9955 reflections
b = 17.101 (6) Åθ = 2.4–30.6°
c = 7.224 (3) ŵ = 5.19 mm1
β = 102.964 (5)°T = 125 K
V = 781.2 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.40 × 0.21 × 0.05 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer4453 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3600 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.046
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 2.4°
φ and ω scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker 2013)k = 0→24
Tmin = 0.55, Tmax = 0.78l = 0→10
4453 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.152w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1149P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
4453 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.15 e Å3
101 parametersΔρmin = −1.15 e Å3
Experimental. BASF 0.0762 (5)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.34409 (5)0.45945 (2)0.19485 (4)0.02009 (16)
O10.4929 (3)0.12531 (11)0.2717 (4)0.0233 (5)
C10.3083 (4)0.14135 (17)0.2062 (4)0.0159 (5)
C20.1260 (4)0.08352 (17)0.1453 (4)0.0179 (5)
H2A0.11170.05020.25370.021*
H2B0.15150.04940.04190.021*
C3−0.0764 (5)0.13304 (17)0.0755 (4)0.0192 (6)
H3A−0.14240.1212−0.05890.023*
H3B−0.18060.12290.15390.023*
C4−0.0002 (4)0.21670 (16)0.0973 (4)0.0154 (5)
C5−0.1162 (5)0.28574 (17)0.0538 (4)0.0194 (5)
H5A−0.26460.28380.00390.023*
C6−0.0119 (4)0.35734 (17)0.0842 (4)0.0178 (5)
H6A−0.08950.40450.05440.021*
C70.2070 (4)0.36019 (16)0.1585 (4)0.0158 (5)
C80.3257 (4)0.29262 (17)0.2034 (4)0.0155 (5)
H8A0.4740.29470.25380.019*
C90.2184 (4)0.22114 (15)0.1714 (4)0.0143 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0266 (2)0.0106 (2)0.0232 (2)−0.00221 (8)0.00597 (15)−0.00020 (8)
O10.0173 (10)0.0158 (10)0.0356 (13)0.0027 (8)0.0034 (9)−0.0001 (9)
C10.0176 (11)0.0125 (12)0.0182 (13)−0.0028 (9)0.0054 (10)−0.0013 (9)
C20.0192 (12)0.0131 (12)0.0217 (13)−0.0026 (10)0.0052 (10)−0.0006 (10)
C30.0195 (13)0.0168 (13)0.0209 (13)−0.0060 (10)0.0035 (11)−0.0010 (10)
C40.0165 (11)0.0153 (12)0.0144 (11)−0.0011 (9)0.0033 (9)0.0006 (9)
C50.0157 (11)0.0193 (13)0.0220 (13)0.0006 (10)0.0015 (10)0.0025 (10)
C60.0194 (12)0.0145 (12)0.0192 (13)0.0043 (10)0.0038 (10)0.0026 (10)
C70.0184 (12)0.0132 (11)0.0161 (12)−0.0018 (9)0.0042 (10)0.0002 (9)
C80.0155 (11)0.0130 (13)0.0177 (13)−0.0011 (9)0.0033 (10)0.0002 (9)
C90.0156 (11)0.0122 (11)0.0151 (11)−0.0010 (9)0.0036 (9)−0.0001 (9)
Br1—C71.907 (3)C4—C51.398 (4)
O1—C11.216 (3)C4—C91.401 (4)
C1—C91.483 (4)C5—C61.392 (4)
C1—C21.529 (4)C5—H5A0.95
C2—C31.549 (4)C6—C71.402 (4)
C2—H2A0.99C6—H6A0.95
C2—H2B0.99C7—C81.386 (4)
C3—C41.510 (4)C8—C91.400 (4)
C3—H3A0.99C8—H8A0.95
C3—H3B0.99
O1—C1—C9126.1 (3)C9—C4—C3111.8 (2)
O1—C1—C2126.6 (3)C6—C5—C4119.3 (3)
C9—C1—C2107.3 (2)C6—C5—H5A120.4
C1—C2—C3106.6 (2)C4—C5—H5A120.4
C1—C2—H2A110.4C5—C6—C7120.4 (3)
C3—C2—H2A110.4C5—C6—H6A119.8
C1—C2—H2B110.4C7—C6—H6A119.8
C3—C2—H2B110.4C8—C7—C6121.5 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B108.6C8—C7—Br1119.5 (2)
C4—C3—C2104.5 (2)C6—C7—Br1119.0 (2)
C4—C3—H3A110.9C7—C8—C9117.3 (2)
C2—C3—H3A110.9C7—C8—H8A121.3
C4—C3—H3B110.9C9—C8—H8A121.3
C2—C3—H3B110.9C8—C9—C4122.3 (2)
H3A—C3—H3B108.9C8—C9—C1127.8 (2)
C5—C4—C9119.2 (2)C4—C9—C1109.9 (2)
C5—C4—C3129.0 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3179.0 (3)Br1—C7—C8—C9−179.01 (19)
C9—C1—C2—C3−0.8 (3)C7—C8—C9—C4−0.1 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (3)C7—C8—C9—C1179.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5179.3 (3)C5—C4—C9—C8−0.1 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C9−0.4 (3)C3—C4—C9—C8179.6 (2)
C9—C4—C5—C60.3 (4)C5—C4—C9—C1−179.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6−179.4 (3)C3—C4—C9—C1−0.1 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7−0.3 (4)O1—C1—C9—C81.1 (5)
C5—C6—C7—C80.1 (4)C2—C1—C9—C8−179.2 (3)
C5—C6—C7—Br1179.2 (2)O1—C1—C9—C4−179.2 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C90.0 (4)C2—C1—C9—C40.6 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3B···O1i0.992.453.408 (4)162
C5—H5A···O1ii0.952.553.253 (4)131
C2—H2B···Br1iii0.993.053.898 (3)145
  8 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Rapid Access to Orthogonally Functionalized Naphthalenes: Application to the Total Synthesis of the Anticancer Agent Chartarin.

Authors:  Teresa A Unzner; Adriana S Grossmann; Thomas Magauer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Small-Molecule CD4-Mimics: Structure-Based Optimization of HIV-1 Entry Inhibition.

Authors:  Bruno Melillo; Shuaiyi Liang; Jongwoo Park; Arne Schön; Joel R Courter; Judith M LaLonde; Daniel J Wendler; Amy M Princiotto; Michael S Seaman; Ernesto Freire; Joseph Sodroski; Navid Madani; Wayne A Hendrickson; Amos B Smith
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Selective inhibition of PARP10 using a chemical genetics strategy.

Authors:  Rory K Morgan; Ian Carter-O'Connell; Michael S Cohen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Non-conventional methodologies in the synthesis of 1-indanones.

Authors:  Manuela Oliverio; Monica Nardi; Paola Costanzo; Luca Cariati; Giancarlo Cravotto; Salvatore Vincenzo Giofrè; Antonio Procopio
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  6-Fluoro-indan-1-one.

Authors:  Benjamin R Slaw; Joseph M Tanski
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-07-02

8.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.