| Literature DB >> 27840406 |
Masaho Ota1, Kosuke Narumiya2, Kenji Kudo1, Yohsuke Yagawa1, Shinsuke Maeda1, Harushi Osugi1, Masakazu Yamamoto1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with esophageal achalasia are considered to be a high-risk group for esophageal carcinoma, and it has been reported that this cancer often arises at a long interval after surgery for achalasia. However, it is unclear whether esophageal carcinoma is frequent when achalasia has been treated successfully and the patient is without dysphagia. In this study, we reviewed patients with esophageal carcinoma who were detected by regular follow-up after surgical treatment of achalasia. CASE REPORT Esophageal cancer was detected by periodic upper GI endoscopy in 6 patients. Most of them had early cancers that were treated by endoscopic resection. All 6 patients had undergone surgery for achalasia and the outcome had been rated as excellent or good. Annual follow-up endoscopy was done and the average duration of follow-up until cancer was seen after surgery was 14.3 years (range: 5 to 40 years). Five patients had early cancer. Four cases had multiple lesions. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, surgery for achalasia usually improves passage symptoms, but esophageal cancer still arises in some cases and the number of tumors occurring many years later is not negligible. Accordingly, long-term endoscopic follow-up is needed for detection of malignancy at an early stage.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27840406 PMCID: PMC5119688 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.899800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
Clinical characteristics of the patients.
| 48/Male | F/II | Heller-Dor | Excellent | 5 | 1 | Lt | 0-IIb | LPM | 6 | EMR |
| 60/Male | St/II | Heller-Dor | Excellent | 6 | 2 | Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 30 | CRT |
| 2 | Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 24 | ESD | |||||
| 63/Male | St/II | Heller-Dor | Excellent | 40 | 2 | Mt | 0-IIc | MM | 23 | ESD |
| Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 8 | ESD | ||||||
| 69/Male | F/II | Heller-Dor | Good | 27 | 2 | Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 18 | Esophagectomy |
| Lt | 0-Is | MP | 17 | Esophagectomy | ||||||
| 68/Male | F/II | Fundic patch | Good | 23 | 3 | Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 30 | ESD |
| Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 24 | ESD | ||||||
| Lt | 0-IIc | EP | 10 | ESD | ||||||
| 63/Female | St/I | Heller-Dor | Excellent | 14 | 1 | Mt | 0-IIc | EP | 12 | ESD |
Figure 1.(A) Case 4. Conventional endoscopy shows a protruding lesion (0–Is) located 37 cm from the incisors (lesion 1). (B) There are few brownish areas at the lesion on narrow-band imaging. (C) Case 4. Conventional endoscopy shows a flat lesion (0–IIb) located 30 cm from the incisors. (D) There is a brownish area at the lesion on narrow-band imaging (lesion 2).
Figure 2.(A) Case 4. Microscopic findings. Tumor depth was T2, ly0, v0 for lesion (lesion 1). (B) T1a-LPM, ly0, v0 for lesion 2 (lesion 2). Epithelial thickening and increased vascularity in the mucosal or submucosal layers were seen at both lesions.
Figure 3.(A) Case 6. Endoscopic findings. Conventional endoscopy shows slightly depressed lesion (0-IIc) at 29–30 cm from the incisor teeth. (B) Case 6. There is a brownish area at the lesion on narrow-band imaging. (C) Case 6. Chromoendoscopy reveals that the lesion is not stained by iodine.
Figure 4.Case 6. Pathological findings: The depth of tumors invasion were T1a-EP (Tis) with ly0 and v0. There was epithelial thickening, as well as cellular infiltration and scarring of the mucosal and submucosal layers.