Tetsuya Kawakita1, Uma M Reddy2, Katherine L Grantz2, Helain J Landy3, Sameer Desale4, Sara N Iqbal2. 1. Obstetrics and Gynecology at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC. Electronic address: tetsuya.x.kawakita@gmail.com. 2. Obstetrics and Gynecology at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC. 3. Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on complications associated with classic cesarean delivery are conflicting. In extremely preterm cesarean delivery (22 0/7-27 6/7 weeks' gestation), the lower uterine segment is thicker. It is plausible that the rates of maternal complications may not differ between classic and low transverse cesarean. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare maternal outcomes associated with classic versus low transverse cesarean after stratifying by gestation (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multihospital retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cesarean delivery at 23 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks' gestation from 2005 through 2014. Composite maternal outcome (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, sepsis, wound infection, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hysterectomy, respiratory complications, and intensive care unit admission) was compared between classic and low transverse cesarean. Outcomes were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models yielding adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and adjusted P values controlling for maternal characteristics, emergency cesarean delivery, and comorbidities. Analyses were stratified by gestational age categories (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). RESULTS: Of 902 women, 221 (64%) and 91 (16%) underwent classic cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 and between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, respectively. There was no increase in maternal complications for classic cesarean versus low transverse cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation. However, between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, classic cesarean was associated with increased risks of the composite maternal outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.45), transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.52), endometritis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-10.21), and intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.52) compared to low transverse cesarean. CONCLUSION: Classic cesarean delivery compared with low transverse was associated with higher maternal complication rates between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks, but not between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation.
BACKGROUND: Data on complications associated with classic cesarean delivery are conflicting. In extremely preterm cesarean delivery (22 0/7-27 6/7 weeks' gestation), the lower uterine segment is thicker. It is plausible that the rates of maternal complications may not differ between classic and low transverse cesarean. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare maternal outcomes associated with classic versus low transverse cesarean after stratifying by gestation (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multihospital retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cesarean delivery at 23 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks' gestation from 2005 through 2014. Composite maternal outcome (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, sepsis, wound infection, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hysterectomy, respiratory complications, and intensive care unit admission) was compared between classic and low transverse cesarean. Outcomes were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models yielding adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and adjusted P values controlling for maternal characteristics, emergency cesarean delivery, and comorbidities. Analyses were stratified by gestational age categories (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). RESULTS: Of 902 women, 221 (64%) and 91 (16%) underwent classic cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 and between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, respectively. There was no increase in maternal complications for classic cesarean versus low transverse cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation. However, between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, classic cesarean was associated with increased risks of the composite maternal outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.45), transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.52), endometritis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-10.21), and intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.52) compared to low transverse cesarean. CONCLUSION: Classic cesarean delivery compared with low transverse was associated with higher maternal complication rates between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks, but not between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation.
Authors: Uma M Reddy; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George R Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Tetsuya Kawakita; Tavor Sondheimer; Angie Jelin; Uma M Reddy; Helain J Landy; Chun-Chih Huang; Patrick S Ramsey; Michelle A Kominiarek; Katherine L Grantz Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2019-06-26
Authors: Mallory Whalen; Elizabeth Chang-Davidson; Terra Moran; Rachel Hoffman; Galit H Frydman; Alexander Slocum; Alissa Dangel Journal: J Med Device Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 0.743