Kristina Malmgren1, Anna Edelvik2. 1. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University and Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: kristina.malmgren@neuro.gu.se. 2. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University and Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is Class I evidence for short-term efficacy of epilepsy surgery from two randomized controlled studies of temporal lobe resection. Long-term outcome studies are observational. The aim of this narrative review was to summarise long-term outcomes taking the study methodology into account. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted identifying articles on long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults with regard to seizures, antiepileptic drug treatment and employment. Definitions of seizure freedom were examined in order to identify the proportions of patients with sustained seizure freedom. The quality of the long-term studies was assessed. RESULTS: In a number of high-quality studies 40-50% of patients had been continuously free from seizures with impairment of consciousness 10 years after resective surgery, with a higher proportion seizure-free at each annual follow-up. The proportion of seizure-free adults in whom AEDs have been withdrawn varied widely across studies, from 19-63% after around 5 years of seizure freedom. Few long-term vocational outcome studies were identified and results were inconsistent. Some investigators found no postoperative changes, others found decreased employment for patients with continuing seizures, but no change or increased employment for seizure-free patients. Having employment at baseline and postoperative seizure freedom were the strongest predictors of employment after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery are by necessity observational. There is a need for more prospective longitudinal studies of both seizure and non-seizure outcomes, considering individual patient trajectories in order to obtain valid outcome data needed for counselling patients about epilepsy surgery.
PURPOSE: There is Class I evidence for short-term efficacy of epilepsy surgery from two randomized controlled studies of temporal lobe resection. Long-term outcome studies are observational. The aim of this narrative review was to summarise long-term outcomes taking the study methodology into account. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted identifying articles on long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults with regard to seizures, antiepileptic drug treatment and employment. Definitions of seizure freedom were examined in order to identify the proportions of patients with sustained seizure freedom. The quality of the long-term studies was assessed. RESULTS: In a number of high-quality studies 40-50% of patients had been continuously free from seizures with impairment of consciousness 10 years after resective surgery, with a higher proportion seizure-free at each annual follow-up. The proportion of seizure-free adults in whom AEDs have been withdrawn varied widely across studies, from 19-63% after around 5 years of seizure freedom. Few long-term vocational outcome studies were identified and results were inconsistent. Some investigators found no postoperative changes, others found decreased employment for patients with continuing seizures, but no change or increased employment for seizure-free patients. Having employment at baseline and postoperative seizure freedom were the strongest predictors of employment after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery are by necessity observational. There is a need for more prospective longitudinal studies of both seizure and non-seizure outcomes, considering individual patient trajectories in order to obtain valid outcome data needed for counselling patients about epilepsy surgery.
Authors: James Sun; Katrina Barth; Shaoyu Qiao; Chia-Han Chiang; Charles Wang; Shervin Rahimpour; Michael Trumpis; Suseendrakumar Duraivel; Agrita Dubey; Katie E Wingel; Iakov Rachinskiy; Alex E Voinas; Breonna Ferrentino; Derek G Southwell; Michael M Haglund; Allan H Friedman; Shivanand P Lad; Werner K Doyle; Florian Solzbacher; Gregory Cogan; Saurabh R Sinha; Sasha Devore; Orrin Devinsky; Daniel Friedman; Bijan Pesaran; Jonathan Viventi Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; John S Duncan; Juri-Alexander Witt; Christian E Elger; Richard Staba; Jerome Engel Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Zhengxiang Cai; Abbas Sohrabpour; Haiteng Jiang; Shuai Ye; Boney Joseph; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Gregory A Worrell; Bin He Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Midhun Mohan; Simon Keller; Andrew Nicolson; Shubhabrata Biswas; David Smith; Jibril Osman Farah; Paul Eldridge; Udo Wieshmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240