PURPOSE: Acute primary resection as treatment for left-sided colonic obstruction (LSCO) is notorious for its high morbidity and mortality rates. Both stenting and loop colostomy construction can serve as a bridge to surgery, hereby avoiding the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with emergency resections. This study aims to investigate the safety of a loop colostomy in patients presenting with acute LSCO. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients that received a loop colostomy for LSCO between 2003 and 2015 was performed. Primary outcomes were mortality, major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades III-IV) and minor morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients presenting with acute LSCO received a diverting colostomy. After colostomy construction, mortality occurred in four patients (2.7%) and major complications were reported in 20 patients (13.7%). In 61 patients, the diverting colostomy served as a palliative measure, because of metastatic disease or unfitness for major surgery. The remaining 85 patients all underwent delayed resection, resulting in an overall mortality, major morbidity and minor morbidity of 6.9% (n = 6), 14.0% (n = 12) and 26.7% (n = 23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diverting colostomy construction is a minimally invasive and safe treatment option for LSCO. It can serve as a definite palliative measure, as well as a bridge to elective surgery. A diverting colostomy as a bridge to surgery might even be a valid alternative for emergency resections, since mortality and morbidity rates following colostomy construction and delayed resection appear lower than reported outcomes following primary resection.
PURPOSE: Acute primary resection as treatment for left-sided colonic obstruction (LSCO) is notorious for its high morbidity and mortality rates. Both stenting and loop colostomy construction can serve as a bridge to surgery, hereby avoiding the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with emergency resections. This study aims to investigate the safety of a loop colostomy in patients presenting with acute LSCO. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients that received a loop colostomy for LSCO between 2003 and 2015 was performed. Primary outcomes were mortality, major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades III-IV) and minor morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients presenting with acute LSCO received a diverting colostomy. After colostomy construction, mortality occurred in four patients (2.7%) and major complications were reported in 20 patients (13.7%). In 61 patients, the diverting colostomy served as a palliative measure, because of metastatic disease or unfitness for major surgery. The remaining 85 patients all underwent delayed resection, resulting in an overall mortality, major morbidity and minor morbidity of 6.9% (n = 6), 14.0% (n = 12) and 26.7% (n = 23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diverting colostomy construction is a minimally invasive and safe treatment option for LSCO. It can serve as a definite palliative measure, as well as a bridge to elective surgery. A diverting colostomy as a bridge to surgery might even be a valid alternative for emergency resections, since mortality and morbidity rates following colostomy construction and delayed resection appear lower than reported outcomes following primary resection.
Authors: Pieter J Tanis; Nuno R Paulino Pereira; Jeanin E van Hooft; Esther C J Consten; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: N E Kolfschoten; M W J M Wouters; G A Gooiker; E H Eddes; J Kievit; R A E M Tollenaar; P J Marang-van de Mheen Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Lane Smothers; Linda Hynan; Jason Fleming; Richard Turnage; Clifford Simmang; Thomas Anthony Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Cristina Martinez-Santos; Rosa F Lobato; José Manuel Fradejas; Isabel Pinto; Pablo Ortega-Deballón; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Sean Maroney; Carlos Chavez de Paz; Mark E Reeves; Carlos Garberoglio; Elizabeth Raskin; Maheswari Senthil; Jukes P Namm; Naveenraj Solomon Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Yongjun Park; Dong Uk Choi; Hyung Ook Kim; Yong Bog Kim; Chungki Min; Jung Tack Son; Sung Ryol Lee; Kyung Uk Jung; Hungdai Kim Journal: Ann Coloproctol Date: 2022-03-07