| Literature DB >> 27838672 |
Breanna Barger-Kamate1,2, Maria Deloria Knoll3, E Wangeci Kagucia3, Christine Prosperi3, Henry C Baggett4,5, W Abdullah Brooks6,7, Daniel R Feikin3,8, Laura L Hammitt3,9, Stephen R C Howie10,11,12, Orin S Levine3,13, Shabir A Madhi14,15, J Anthony G Scott9,16, Donald M Thea17, Tussanee Amornintapichet18, Trevor P Anderson19, Juliet O Awori9, Vicky L Baillie14,15, James Chipeta20,21, Andrea N DeLuca3,22, Amanda J Driscoll3, Doli Goswami7, Melissa M Higdon3, Lokman Hossain7, Ruth A Karron23, Susan Maloney4,24, David P Moore14,15, Susan C Morpeth9,16,25, Lawrence Mwananyanda17,21, Ogochukwu Ofordile10, Emmanuel Olutunde10, Daniel E Park3,26, Samba O Sow27, Milagritos D Tapia28, David R Murdoch19,29, Katherine L O'Brien3, Karen L Kotloff28.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few data exist describing pertussis epidemiology among infants and children in low- and middle-income countries to guide preventive strategies.Entities:
Keywords: infant; pertussis; pneumonia; vaccination; whooping cough
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27838672 PMCID: PMC5106621 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Study Participants Enrolled and Tested for Bordetella pertussis, Percentage Positive by Age and Site, and Case Fatality Ratio Among Pertussis-Positive Cases
| Age Group | GAM | KEN | MAL | SAF | ZAM | BAN | THA | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–5 mo | ||||||||
| No. enrolled | ||||||||
| Case | 259 | 209 | 307 | 458 | 327 | 136 | 38 | 1734 |
| Control | 199 | 234 | 247 | 365 | 310 | 221 | 91 | 1667 |
| No. with analyzable specimen | ||||||||
| Case | 256 | 208 | 307 | 455 | 321 | 136 | 38 | 1721 |
| Control | 189 | 231 | 247 | 363 | 275 | 221 | 91 | 1617 |
| Reason excludeda | ||||||||
| Case | A:1, D:1, E:1 | B:1 | None | C:2, E:1 | B:4, E:2 | None | None | A:1, B:5, C:2, D:1, E:4 |
| Control | D:2, E:7; F:1 | E:2, F:1 | None | E:2 | E:35 | None | None | D:2, E:46, F:2 |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 3 (1.2) | 2 (1.0) | 8 (2.6) | 18 (4.0) | 9 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 40 (2.3) |
| Control | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.8) | 4 (1.1) | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.2) | 8 (0.5) |
| No. | ||||||||
| Caseb | 0/1/2 | 0/1/1 | 2/0/6 | 1/4/13 | 4/4/1 | … | … | 7/10/23 |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 0 | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 3 (16.7) | 1 (11.1) | … | … | 5 (12.5) |
| 6–59 mo | ||||||||
| No. enrolled | ||||||||
| Case | 379 | 425 | 367 | 462 | 290 | 389 | 186 | 2498 |
| Control | 455 | 631 | 478 | 599 | 376 | 551 | 568 | 3658 |
| No. with analyzable specimen | ||||||||
| Case | 370 | 424 | 366 | 462 | 282 | 389 | 186 | 2479 |
| Control | 432 | 626 | 477 | 596 | 335 | 547 | 566 | 3579 |
| Reason excludeda | ||||||||
| Case | A:1; B:4; E:4 | B:1 | E:1 | None | B:4; E:4 | None | None | A:1; B:9; E:9 |
| Control | D:3; E:18, F:2 | E:3, F:2 | E:1 | E:3 | E:41 | E:4 | E:2 | D:3, E:72, F:4 |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) | 5 (1.1) | 2 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 13 (0.5) |
| Control | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.2) | 3 (0.1) |
| No. | ||||||||
| Caseb | 0/1/0 | 0/2/0 | 1/0/1 | 1/2/2 | 1/1/0 | 0/0/1 | … | 3/6/4 |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 0 | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 | … | 3 (23.1) |
| 1–59 mo | ||||||||
| No. enrolled | ||||||||
| Case | 638 | 634 | 674 | 920 | 617 | 525 | 224 | 4232 |
| Control | 654 | 865 | 725 | 964 | 686 | 772 | 659 | 5325 |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 4 (0.6) | 4 (0.6) | 10 (1.5) | 23 (2.5) | 11 (1.8) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) | 53 (1.3) |
| Control | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (0.6) | 4 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.5) | 11 (0.2) |
| No. | ||||||||
| Case | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (20.0) | 4 (17.4) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | … | 8 (15.1) |
Case-control comparisons of Bp positivity: all P < .05.
Abbreviations: BAN, Bangladesh; Bp, Bordetella pertussis; GAM, The Gambia; IS, induced sputum; KEN, Kenya; MAL, Mali; NP, nasopharyngeal; NP-OP, nasopharyngeal-oropharyngeal swab; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SAF, South Africa; THA, Thailand; ZAM, Zambia.
a Reasons for exclusion: A: met exclusion criteria for IS collection and NP PCR result not available; B: died before specimen collected; C: child could not produce specimen; D: other; E: unknown reason for missing IS and/or NP PCR results; F: parent/guardian refused.
b Applicable to cases only as IS not collected for controls.
c Of the 35 Bp-positive cases aged 1–5 months discharged alive, 21 (60%) had the 30-day follow-up completed and all cases were alive.
d Of the 10 Bp-positive cases aged 6–59 months discharged alive, 9 (90%) had the 30-day follow-up completed and all cases were alive.
Characteristics of Cases and Controls Aged 1–5 Months by Pertussis Status
| Characteristic | Cases, No. (%) | Pertussis-Positive vs -Negative Casesa | Controls, No. (%) | Pertussis-Positive Cases vs Controlsb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertussis Positive (n = 40) | Pertussis Negative (n = 1507) | Pertussis Negative (n = 174) | aORc | All Africa (n = 1305) | All Asia (n = 312) | Pertussis Positive (n = 8) | aORc | |||
| Africa | Africa | Asia | Africa | Africa | Asia | Mali, South Africa, Thailand | Africa | |||
| Age, wk, mean (SD) | 10.3 (6.6) | 12.9 (6.0) | 14.2 (5.8) | … | .012 | 15.8 (5.9) | 18.2 (5.0) | 12.6 (7.2) | … | <.0001** |
| ≤3 mo old | 33 (82.5) | 1078 (71.5) | 114 (65.5) | 1.78 | .17 | 684 (52.4) | 107 (34.3)* | 5 (62.5) | 3.87 | .001** |
| Female | 15 (37.5) | 652 (43.3) | 56 (32.2) | 0.71 | .31 | 657 (50.3) | 154 (49.4) | 4 (50.0) | 0.58 | .10 |
| Never breastfed | 10 (25.0) | 175 (11.7) | 8 (4.6) | 1.84 | .15 | 117 (9.0) | 4 (1.3)* | 0 (0.0) | 2.47d | .05** |
| Underweighte | 14 (35.0) | 388 (25.8) | 36 (20.7) | 1.72 | .12 | 98 (7.6) | 22 (7.1) | 2 (25.0) | 6.30 | <.0001** |
| Premature or low birth weightf | 13 (33.3) | 388 (26.0) | 59 (34.1) | 1.58 | .19 | 258 (19.9) | 51 (16.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2.02 | .052 |
| HIV-infectedg | 3 (7.5) | 109 (7.2) | 1 (0.6) | 0.81 | .74 | 65 (5.0) | 0 (0.0)* | 0 (0.0) | 1.05 | .93 |
| HIV uninfected-exposedh | 12 (31.6) | 244 (18.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1.43 | .38 | 166 (15.2) | 0 (0.0)* | 1 (12.5) | 2.17 | .053 |
| Pertussis vaccinationi | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| Missing Vaccination data | 1 (2.5) | 43 (2.9) | 3 (1.7) | 0.82 | .85 | 18 (1.4) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (12.5) | 1.30 | .80 |
| Immunization record available | 31 (79.5) | 1255 (85.7) | 155 (90.6) | 0.35 | .09 | 1184 (92.1) | 306 (98.4)* | 5 (71.4) | 0.19 | .0002** |
| Undervaccinated for age (any dose) | 3 (7.7) | 221 (15.1) | 14 (8.2) | 0.45 | .18 | 302 (23.5) | 39 (12.5)* | 0 (0.0) | … | … |
| 0 doses | ||||||||||
| Total not vaccinated | 26 (66.7) | 583 (39.8) | 56 (32.8) | 2.82 | .02 | 276 (21.5) | 30 (9.7) | 2 (28.6) | 3.69 | .005** |
| Too young | 26 (66.7) | 502 (34.3) | 51 (29.8) | 8.09 | .001 | 190 (14.8) | 25 (8.0) | 2 (28.6) | 16.06 | <.0001** |
| Undervaccinated for age | 0 (0.0) | 81 (5.5) | 5 (2.9) | … | … | 86 (6.7) | 5 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | … | … |
| 1 dose | ||||||||||
| Total 1 dose | 6 (15.4) | 414 (28.3) | 54 (31.6) | … | … | 337 (26.2) | 74 (23.8) | 3 (42.9) | … | … |
| Undervaccinated for age | 1 (2.6) | 65 (4.4) | 8 (4.7) | … | … | 89 (6.9) | 9 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | … | … |
| 2 doses | ||||||||||
| Total 2 doses | 3 (7.7) | 290 (19.8) | 31 (18.1) | … | … | 359 (27.9) | 100 (32.2) | 1 (14.3) | … | … |
| Undervaccinated for age | 2 (5.1) | 75 (5.1) | 1 (0.6) | … | … | 127 (9.9) | 25 (8.0) | 0 (0.0) | … | … |
| 3 doses | ||||||||||
| Total 3 doses | 4 (10.3) | 177 (12.1) | 30 (17.5) | … | … | 315 (24.5) | 107 (34.4) | 1 (14.3) | … | … |
Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BAN, Bangladesh; GAM, The Gambia; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; KEN, Kenya; MAL, Mali; OR, odds ratio; SAF, South Africa; SD, standard deviation; THA, Thailand; ZAM, Zambia.
a Pertussis-positive cases compared to negative cases, restricted to Africa.
b Pertussis-positive cases compared to all controls (regardless of pertussis status), restricted to Africa.
c Odds ratios and P values from logistic regression models adjusted for site. Odds ratio for “underweight,” “premature or low birth weight,” “total not vaccinated,” and “too young” adjusted for site and age in weeks.
d All 10 pertussis-positive cases who were never breastfed were from South Africa; 8 of 10 were HIV exposed. When HIV exposure is included in the model, lack of breastfeeding is no longer significantly associated with pertussis case status, compared to African controls (OR, 1.82; P = .24). Due to limited numbers, we cannot evaluate the association between breastfeeding and pertussis case status in the absence of HIV exposure.
e Underweight defined as weight for age <−2 SD of the median age-/sex-specific World Health Organization reference. Remained independently associated with pertussis case status, compared to African controls, after adjusting for age, site, and prematurity or low birth weight (OR, 6.13; P < .0001).
f Prematurity was defined as gestational age <37 weeks by parental report. Low birth weight was defined as <2.5 kg or small size at birth by parental report. No longer associated with pertussis case status, compared to African controls, after adjusting for age, site, and underweight (OR, 1.18; P = .68).
g HIV-infected defined as detectable viral load or HIV seropositive if >12 months old.
h HIV uninfected-exposed defined as an infant or child with a negative virologic test for HIV who had evidence of HIV exposure, defined as HIV seropositive (if <12 months of age), or seronegative with a maternal history of HIV infection (for all ages), with the caveat that maternal exposure must be confirmed by maternal serology for seronegative infants aged <7 months.
i ‘Total not vaccinated’ based on number of doses received at 2 weeks prior to enrollment (for children without cough) or at 2 weeks prior to start of cough (for children with cough). ‘Too young’ defined as zero doses and age two weeks prior to enrollment or age two weeks prior to cough onset ≤8 weeks (KEN, MAL, ZAM, SAF, BAN) or ≤10 weeks (GAM, THA). ‘Under-vaccinated for age’ defined as the following: Age >8, >12 or >16 weeks with zero, one or two doses, respectively (KEN, MAL, ZAM, SAF, BAN); Age >10, >16 or >18 weeks with zero, one or two doses, respectively (GAM); Age >10, >18 or >26 weeks with zero, one or two doses, respectively (THA). Age based on age two weeks prior to enrollment or two weeks prior to cough onset.
* Significant (P < .05) difference comparing controls from Africa vs Asia (regardless of pertussis status) using logistics regression models or Fisher exact test; “underweight,” “total not vaccinated,” and “too young” adjusted for age in weeks.
**P ≤ .05.
Association of Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiographic Findings With Pertussis Status Among Cases and Controls Aged 1–5 Months
| Characteristic | Casesa | Controlsb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertussis Positive (n = 40) | Pertussis Negative (n = 1507) | Pertussis Positive vs Negative | Pertussis Positive (n = 8) | Pertussis Negative (n = 693) | Pertussis Positive vs Negative | |||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | aORc | No. (%) | No. (%) | aORc | |||
| Africa | Mali, South Africa, Thailand | |||||||
| Runny nose, by report | 12 (30.0) | 552 (36.6) | 0.69 | .33 | 2 (28.6) | 82 (11.9) | 2.87 | .28 |
| Coughd | 40 (100.0) | 1437 (95.4) | … | .26 | 2 (25.0) | 68 (9.8) | 3.58 | .14 |
| Cough ≥ 7 d | 18 (48.7) | 228 (16.3) | 5.0 | <.0001* | 0 (0.0) | 10 (15.2) | … | … |
| Cough ≥ 14 d | 10 (27.0) | 77 (5.5) | 6.3 | <.0001* | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.5) | … | … |
| Duration of cough, d, median (IQR)e | 5 (3–14) | 3 (2–5) | … | .004* | 4 (3–5) | 3 (2–5) | … | .56 |
| Feverd | 29 (72.5) | 1168 (77.5) | 1.02 | .97 | 2 (25.0) | 13 (1.9) | 19.45 | .004* |
| Vomitingd | 14 (35.0) | 266 (17.7) | 2.55 | .006* | 1 (14.3) | 1 (0.1) | 151.50 | .0009* |
| Unable to feedd | 9 (22.5) | 234 (15.5) | 1.54 | .27 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | … | … |
| Tachypneaf | 28 (70.0) | 1172 (78.7) | 0.63 | .20 | 4 (50.0) | 108 (16.9) | … | … |
| Hypoxiag | 26 (65.0) | 721 (48.0) | 1.49 | .29 | … | … | … | … |
| Stridor | 1 (2.5) | 34 (2.3) | 0.95 | .96 | … | … | … | … |
| Grunting | 7 (18.4) | 351 (23.4) | 0.62 | .33 | … | … | … | … |
| Nasal flaring | 32 (80.0) | 1060 (70.5) | 1.38 | .44 | … | … | … | … |
| Deep breathing | 2 (5.0) | 194 (12.9) | 0.38 | .19 | … | … | … | … |
| Audible wheeze | 0 (0.0) | 104 (6.9) | … | .11 | … | … | … | … |
| CXR positive | 23 (59.0) | 664 (47.0) | 1.50 | .23 | … | … | … | … |
| WBC, × 1000 cells/µL, median (IQR) | 19.6 (14.2–34.1) | 12.6 (9.1–16.7) | … | <.0001* | … | … | … | … |
| WBC ≥ 20 ×103 cells/µL | 18 (46.2) | 216 (15.2) | 4.6 | <.0001* | … | … | … | … |
| Lymphocyte count ×103 cells/µL, median (IQR) | 10.5 (6.1–21.5) | 5.9 (4.1–8.2) | … | <.0001* | … | … | … | … |
| Lymphocyte count ≥ 10 ×103 cells/µL | 20 (52.6) | 179 (12.9) | 7.2 | <.0001* | … | … | … | … |
| Pertussis NP/OP PCR log copies/mL, median (IQR)h | 7.4 (6.2–8.4) | … | … | … | 5.2 (3.8–7.7) | … | … | … |
“…” Represents variables that were not assessed among controls (hypoxia, stridor, grunting, nasal flaring, deep breathing, audible wheeze) or were measured among too few controls to allow meaningful comparison (WBC, lymphocytes).
Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CXR, chest radiograph; IQR, interquartile range; NP/OP, nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; WBC, white blood cell.
a Analysis restricted to sites with at least 1 pertussis-positive case (Kenya, The Gambia, Zambia, Mali, and South Africa).
b Restricted to sites with at least 1 pertussis-positive control (Mali, South Africa, and Thailand).
c Odds ratios and P values from logistic regression models adjusted for site. After adjusting the WBC and lymphocyte counts for age, there was a minor change in the odds ratios (WBC, 4.8; lymphocyte, 7.7), but no change in P value.
d By history and/or physical examination. For fever, 12.5% of pertussis positive cases aged 1–5 months had documented fever; the remaining were based on reported fever.
e Restricted to children with cough by history and/or physical examination. Duration in days.
f Respiratory rate >60 breaths/minute if aged <2 months, >50 breaths/minute if aged 2–5 months.
g A child was considered to be hypoxic if (1) a room air pulse oximetry reading indicated oxygen saturation <90% at the 2 sites at elevation (Zambia and South Africa) or <92% at all other sites, or (2) a room air oxygen saturation reading was not available and the child was on oxygen.
h Median pertussis PCR log copies/mL not significantly different comparing pertussis-positive cases to pertussis-positive controls (P = .07, Kruskal–Wallis test).
*P ≤ .05.
Figure 1.Cumulative age distribution of children with severe or very severe pneumonia by pertussis infection status as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results. A, Children with a positive PCR result for pertussis (n = 53). B, Children whose PCR results were negative (n = 4120). Pertussis-positive children were significantly younger than pertussis-negative children (median, 2 vs 7 months; P = .01, logistic regression adjusted for site, restricted to sites in Africa and Bangladesh where positive cases were found).