Literature DB >> 27838430

Targeting of the Subthalamic Nucleus for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Survey Among Parkinson Disease Specialists.

Wolfgang Hamel1, Johannes A Köppen2, François Alesch3, Angelo Antonini4, Juan A Barcia5, Hagai Bergman6, Stephan Chabardes7, Maria Fiorella Contarino8, Philippe Cornu9, Walter Demmel10, Günther Deuschl11, Alfonso Fasano12, Andrea A Kühn13, Patricia Limousin14, Cameron C McIntyre15, H Maximilian Mehdorn16, Manuela Pilleri17, Pierre Pollak18, Maria C Rodríguez-Oroz19, Jordi Rumià20, Michael Samuel21, Lars Timmermann22, Francesc Valldeoriola23, Jan Vesper24, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle25, Jens Volkmann26, Andres M Lozano27.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation within or adjacent to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) represents the most common stereotactic procedure performed for Parkinson disease. Better STN imaging is often regarded as a requirement for improving stereotactic targeting. However, it is unclear whether there is consensus about the optimal target.
METHODS: To obtain an expert opinion on the site regarded optimal for "STN stimulation," movement disorder specialists were asked to indicate their preferred position for an active contact on hard copies of the Schaltenbrand and Wahren atlas depicting the STN in all 3 planes. This represented an idealized setting, and it mimicked optimal imaging for direct target definition in a perfectly delineated STN.
RESULTS: The suggested targets were heterogeneous, although some clustering was observed in the dorsolateral STN and subthalamic area. In particular, in the anteroposterior direction, the intended targets differed to a great extent. Most of the indicated targets are thought to also result in concomitant stimulation of structures adjacent to the STN, including the zona incerta, fields of Forel, and internal capsule.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey illustrates that most sites regarded as optimal for STN stimulation are close to each other, but there appears to be no uniform perception of the optimal anatomic target, possibly influencing surgical results. The anatomic sweet zone for STN stimulation needs further specification, as this information is likely to make magnetic resonance imaging-based target definition less variable when applied to individual patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Parkinson disease; Subthalamic nucleus; Targeting

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838430     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  12 in total

1.  Quantifying axonal responses in patient-specific models of subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Kabilar Gunalan; Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Faical Isbaine; Jon T Willie; Enrico Opri; Robert E Gross; Coralie De Hemptinne; Philip A Starr; Cameron C McIntyre; Svjetlana Miocinovic
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Semi-automated approaches to optimize deep brain stimulation parameters in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kenneth H Louie; Matthew N Petrucci; Logan L Grado; Chiahao Lu; Paul J Tuite; Andrew G Lamperski; Colum D MacKinnon; Scott E Cooper; Theoden I Netoff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Motor outcome and electrode location in deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Maija Koivu; Antti Huotarinen; Filip Scheperjans; Aki Laakso; Riku Kivisaari; Eero Pekkonen
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Patient-specific anatomical model for deep brain stimulation based on 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Yuval Duchin; Reuben R Shamir; Remi Patriat; Jinyoung Kim; Jerrold L Vitek; Guillermo Sapiro; Noam Harel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rat subthalamic stimulation: Evaluating stimulation-induced dyskinesias, choosing stimulation currents and evaluating the anti-akinetic effect in the cylinder test.

Authors:  Antti Huotarinen; Sakari Leino; Raimo K Tuominen; Aki Laakso
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2019-10-14

7.  3 versus 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures in clinical settings.

Authors:  Bethany R Isaacs; Martijn J Mulder; Josephine M Groot; Nikita van Berendonk; Nicky Lute; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Birte U Forstmann; Anneke Alkemade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  StimVision v2: Examples and Applications in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Angela M Noecker; Anneke M Frankemolle-Gilbert; Bryan Howell; Mikkel V Petersen; Sinem Balta Beylergil; Aasef G Shaikh; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-01-03

9.  Multiple Microelectrode Recordings in STN-DBS Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Silje Bjerknes; Mathias Toft; Ane E Konglund; Uyen Pham; Trine Rygvold Waage; Lena Pedersen; Mona Skjelland; Ira Haraldsen; Stein Andersson; Espen Dietrichs; Inger Marie Skogseid
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 10.  Current Directions in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease-Directing Current to Maximize Clinical Benefit.

Authors:  Aristide Merola; Alberto Romagnolo; Vibhor Krishna; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Stephen Carcieri; Steven Goetz; George Mandybur; Andrew P Duker; Brian Dalm; John D Rolston; Alfonso Fasano; Leo Verhagen
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2020-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.