Literature DB >> 27838119

Low-carbon agriculture in South America to mitigate global climate change and advance food security.

João Carlos de Moraes Sá1, Rattan Lal2, Carlos Clemente Cerri3, Klaus Lorenz2, Mariangela Hungria4, Paulo Cesar de Faccio Carvalho5.   

Abstract

The worldwide historical carbon (C) losses due to Land Use and Land-Use Change between 1870 and 2014 are estimated at 148 Pg C (1 Pg=1billionton). South America is chosen for this study because its soils contain 10.3% (160 Pg C to 1-m depth) of the soil organic carbon stock of the world soils, it is home to 5.7% (0.419 billion people) of the world population, and accounts for 8.6% of the world food (491milliontons) and 21.0% of meat production (355milliontons of cattle and buffalo). The annual C emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in South America represent only 2.5% (0.25 Pg C) of the total global emissions (9.8 Pg C). However, South America contributes 31.3% (0.34 Pg C) of global annual greenhouse gas emissions (1.1 Pg C) through Land Use and Land Use Change. The potential of South America as a terrestrial C sink for mitigating climate change with adoption of Low-Carbon Agriculture (LCA) strategies based on scenario analysis method is 8.24 Pg C between 2016 and 2050. The annual C offset for 2016 to 2020, 2021 to 2035, and 2036 to 2050 is estimated at 0.08, 0.25, and 0.28 Pg C, respectively, equivalent to offsetting 7.5, 22.2 and 25.2% of the global annual greenhouse gas emissions by Land Use and Land Use Change for each period. Emission offset for LCA activities is estimated at 31.0% by restoration of degraded pasturelands, 25.6% by integrated crop-livestock-forestry-systems, 24.3% by no-till cropping systems, 12.8% by planted commercial forest and forestation, 4.2% by biological N fixation and 2.0% by recycling the industrial organic wastes. The ecosystem carbon payback time for historical C losses from South America through LCA strategies may be 56 to 188years, and the adoption of LCA can also increase food and meat production by 615Mton or 17.6Mtonyear-1 and 56Mton or 1.6Mtonyear-1, respectively, between 2016 and 2050. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best agricultural management practices; C-offset; Greenhouse gas; Land use and land use change

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838119     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  8 in total

Review 1.  Animal production and soil characteristics from integrated crop-livestock systems: toward sustainable intensification.

Authors:  Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho; Caitlin Adair Peterson; Pedro Arthur de Albuquerque Nunes; Amanda Posselt Martins; William de Souza Filho; Vanessa Thoma Bertolazi; Taíse Robinson Kunrath; Aníbal de Moraes; Ibanor Anghinoni
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Practice: Moving from Theory to Planning in Colombia's Livestock Sector.

Authors:  Amy M Lerner; Andrés Felipe Zuluaga; Julián Chará; Andrés Etter; Timothy Searchinger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Role of Nodulation-Enhancing Rhizobacteria in the Promotion of Medicago sativa Development in Nutrient-Poor Soils.

Authors:  Noris J Flores-Duarte; Enrique Mateos-Naranjo; Susana Redondo-Gómez; Eloísa Pajuelo; Ignacio D Rodriguez-Llorente; Salvadora Navarro-Torre
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 4.  The role of legumes in the sustainable intensification of African smallholder agriculture: Lessons learnt and challenges for the future.

Authors:  B Vanlauwe; M Hungria; F Kanampiu; K E Giller
Journal:  Agric Ecosyst Environ       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.567

5.  Combining microorganisms in inoculants is agronomically important but industrially challenging: case study of a composite inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum for the soybean crop.

Authors:  Marcos Vinicios Conceição Garcia; Marco Antonio Nogueira; Mariangela Hungria
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Taxonomic and Functional Responses of Soil Microbial Communities to Annual Removal of Aboveground Plant Biomass.

Authors:  Xue Guo; Xishu Zhou; Lauren Hale; Mengting Yuan; Jiajie Feng; Daliang Ning; Zhou Shi; Yujia Qin; Feifei Liu; Liyou Wu; Zhili He; Joy D Van Nostrand; Xueduan Liu; Yiqi Luo; James M Tiedje; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Soil Carbon Dynamics in Soybean Cropland and Forests in Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Authors:  R Chelsea Nagy; Stephen Porder; Paulo Brando; Eric A Davidson; Adelaine Michela E Silva Figueira; Christopher Neill; Shelby Riskin; Susan Trumbore
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.822

Review 8.  Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation.

Authors:  Josiane Fukami; Paula Cerezini; Mariangela Hungria
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.