Literature DB >> 27838034

Investing in CenteringPregnancy™ Group Prenatal Care Reduces Newborn Hospitalization Costs.

Amy Crockett1, Emily C Heberlein2, Leah Glasscock3, Sarah Covington-Kolb4, Karen Shea3, Imtiaz A Khan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: CenteringPregnancy™ group prenatal care is an innovative model with promising evidence of reducing preterm birth. The outpatient costs of offering CenteringPregnancy pose barriers to model adoption. Enhanced provider reimbursement for group prenatal care may improve birth outcomes and generate newborn hospitalization cost savings for insurers. To investigate potential cost savings for investment in CenteringPregnancy, we evaluated the impact on newborn hospital admission costs of a pilot incentive project, where BlueChoice Health Plan South Carolina Medicaid managed care organization paid an obstetric practice offering CenteringPregnancy $175 for each patient who participated in at least five group prenatal care sessions.
METHODS: Using a one to many case-control matching without replacement, each CenteringPregnancy participant was matched retrospectively on propensity score, age, race, and clinical risk factors with five individual care participants. We estimated the odds of newborn hospital admission type (neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] or well-baby admission) for matched CenteringPregnancy and individual care cohorts with four or more visits using multivariate logistic regression. Cost savings were calculated using mean costs per admission type at the delivery hospital.
RESULTS: Of the CenteringPregnancy newborns, 3.5% had a NICU admission compared with 12.0% of individual care newborns (p < .001). Investing in CenteringPregnancy for 85 patients ($14,875) led to an estimated net savings for the managed care organization of $67,293 in NICU costs.
CONCLUSIONS: CenteringPregnancy may reduce costs through fewer NICU admissions. Enhanced reimbursement from payers to obstetric practices supporting CenteringPregnancy sustainability may improve birth outcomes and reduce associated NICU costs.
Copyright © 2016 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838034     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  5 in total

1.  Effects of a Multi-site Expansion of Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Amy H Crockett; Emily C Heberlein; Jessica C Smith; Pelin Ozluk; Sarah Covington-Kolb; Carla Willis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10

2.  Implementing Group Prenatal Care in Southwest Georgia Through Public-Private Partnerships.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Grant; Katherine Handwerk; Karen Baker; VaLenia Milling; Sharonda Barlow; Catherine J Vladutiu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

3.  Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women's Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study).

Authors:  Ellen Francis; Mary Beth Johnstone; Sarah Convington-Kolb; Brian Witrick; Sarah F Griffin; Xiaoqian Sun; Amy Crockett; Liwei Chen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10

4.  An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial assessing the impact of group versus individual antenatal care on maternal and infant outcomes in Malawi.

Authors:  Ellen Chirwa; Esnath Kapito; Diana L Jere; Ursula Kafulafula; Elizabeth Chodzaza; Genesis Chorwe-Sungani; Ashley Gresh; Li Liu; Elizabeth T Abrams; Carrie S Klima; Linda L McCreary; Kathleen F Norr; Crystal L Patil
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Integrative Group Medical Visits: A National Scoping Survey of Safety-Net Clinics.

Authors:  Ariana Thompson-Lastad; Paula Gardiner; Maria T Chao
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2019-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.