Literature DB >> 2783801

Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms: comparison of MR and CT.

E Steiner1, D D Stark, P F Hahn, S Saini, J F Simeone, P R Mueller, J Wittenberg, J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

Thirty-two patients with pathologically proved pancreatic carcinomas or cystadenomas were evaluated with MR images obtained with T1-weighted spin echo (short TR/short TE), inversion recovery, and T2-weighted spin-echo (long TR/long TE) pulse sequences. CT was used as the reference standard to determine the ability of MR to delineate normal and abnormal pancreatic anatomy and thereby to exclude or detect pancreatic malignancy. Short TR/short TE spin-echo sequences were significantly better (p less than .05) than inversion recovery or T2-weighted spin-echo sequences in resolution of both normal and abnormal anatomy. Resolution of pancreatic anatomy correlated (r = .9) with the image signal-to-noise ratio. In seven (22%) of 32 cases, MR visualized pancreatic tumors better than CT did because it showed a signal intensity difference between the tumor and normal pancreatic tissue. Overall, the slight superiority of MR over CT for tumor visualization tended to occur in larger tumors and was not statistically significant. On T1-weighted images, 63% (20 of 32) of pancreatic tumors studied had lower signal intensities than normal pancreatic tissue, whereas on T2-weighted sequences (TE = 60, 120, and 180 msec) only 41% (13 of 32) of tumors had increased signal intensities. Currently available MR imaging techniques offer no significant advantages over CT for evaluating the pancreas for neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783801     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Recent developments in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Arjun S Takhar; Ponni Palaniappan; Rajpal Dhingsa; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-18

2.  Diagnosing cancer of the pancreas.

Authors:  J N Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-06

3.  Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Current management of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  "Mass-forming" pancreatitis masquerades as pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; K Chijiiwa; S Saiki; A Nakatsuka; M Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1996-08

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas with gadolinium-DTPA.

Authors:  J L Chezmar; R C Nelson; W C Small; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 7.  Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnostic dilemma with significant consequences.

Authors:  Bryce Taylor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic and Dispositional Tool after Mild-Moderate Blast Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Olga Rodriguez; Michele L Schaefer; Brock Wester; Yi-Chien Lee; Nathan Boggs; Howard A Conner; Andrew C Merkle; Stanley T Fricke; Chris Albanese; Vassilis E Koliatsos
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Clinical evaluation, imaging studies, indications for cytologic study and preprocedural requirements for duct brushing studies and pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Authors:  Douglas Adler; C Max Schmidt; Mohammad Al-Haddad; James S Barthel; Britt-Marie Ljung; Nipun B Merchant; Joseph Romagnuolo; Akram M Shaaban; Diane Simeone; Martha Bishop Pitman; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.091

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.