Catrin Grunewald1, Michael Sauberer2, Thomas Filip2, Thomas Wanek2, Johann Stanek2, Severin Mairinger2, Sofia Rollet2, Petra Kudejova3, Oliver Langer4, Christian Schütz1, Matthias Blaickner2, Claudia Kuntner5. 1. Institut für Kernchemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, DE -55128, Germany. 2. Health and Environment Department, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria. 3. Forschungs-Neutronenquelle Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRM II), Technische Universität München, D-85748, Garching, Germany. 4. Health and Environment Department, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. Health and Environment Department, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria. Electronic address: claudia.kuntner@ait.ac.at.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In recent years extra-corporal application of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was evaluated for liver primary tumors or liver metastases. A prerequisite for such a high-risk procedure is proof of preferential delivery and high uptake of a 10B-pharmaceutical in liver malignancies. In this work we evaluated in a preclinical tumor model if [18F]FBPA tissue distribution measured with PET is able to predict the tissue distribution of [10B]L-BPA. METHODS: Tumor bearing mice (hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HuH-7) were either subject of a [18F]FBPA-PET scan with subsequent measurement of radioactivity content in extracted organs using a gamma counter or injected with [10B]L-BPA with tissue samples analyzed by prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA) or quantitative neutron capture radiography (QNCR). The impact of L-tyrosine, L-DOPA and L-BPA preloading on the tissue distribution of [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA was evaluated and the pharmacokinetics of [18F]FBPA investigated by compartment modeling. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA uptake in tumors and various organs as well as high accumulation levels in pancreas and kidneys as reported in previous studies. Tumor-to-liver ratios of [18F]FBPA ranged from 1.2 to 1.5. Preloading did not increase the uptake of [18F]FBPA or [10B]L-BPA in any organ and compartment modeling showed no statistically significant differences in [18F]FBPA tumor kinetics. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]FBPA-PET predicts [10B]L-BPA concentration after amino acid preloading in HuH-7 hepatocellular carcinoma models. Preloading had no effect on tumor uptake of [18F]FBPA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Despite differences in chemical structure and administered dose [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA demonstrate an equivalent biodistribution in a preclinical tumor model. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: [18F]FBPA-PET is suitable for treatment planning and dose calculations in BNCT applications for liver malignancies. However, alternative tracers with more favorable tumor-to-liver ratios should be investigated.
INTRODUCTION: In recent years extra-corporal application of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was evaluated for liver primary tumors or liver metastases. A prerequisite for such a high-risk procedure is proof of preferential delivery and high uptake of a 10B-pharmaceutical in liver malignancies. In this work we evaluated in a preclinical tumor model if [18F]FBPA tissue distribution measured with PET is able to predict the tissue distribution of [10B]L-BPA. METHODS:Tumor bearing mice (hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HuH-7) were either subject of a [18F]FBPA-PET scan with subsequent measurement of radioactivity content in extracted organs using a gamma counter or injected with [10B]L-BPA with tissue samples analyzed by prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA) or quantitative neutron capture radiography (QNCR). The impact of L-tyrosine, L-DOPA and L-BPA preloading on the tissue distribution of [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA was evaluated and the pharmacokinetics of [18F]FBPA investigated by compartment modeling. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA uptake in tumors and various organs as well as high accumulation levels in pancreas and kidneys as reported in previous studies. Tumor-to-liver ratios of [18F]FBPA ranged from 1.2 to 1.5. Preloading did not increase the uptake of [18F]FBPA or [10B]L-BPA in any organ and compartment modeling showed no statistically significant differences in [18F]FBPA tumor kinetics. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]FBPA-PET predicts [10B]L-BPA concentration after amino acid preloading in HuH-7hepatocellular carcinoma models. Preloading had no effect on tumor uptake of [18F]FBPA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Despite differences in chemical structure and administered dose [18F]FBPA and [10B]L-BPA demonstrate an equivalent biodistribution in a preclinical tumor model. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: [18F]FBPA-PET is suitable for treatment planning and dose calculations in BNCT applications for liver malignancies. However, alternative tracers with more favorable tumor-to-liver ratios should be investigated.