Literature DB >> 27837600

Air exchange rates and alternative vapor entry pathways to inform vapor intrusion exposure risk assessments.

Rivka Reichman, Mohammadyousef Roghani, Evan J Willett, Elham Shirazi, Kelly G Pennell.   

Abstract

Vapor intrusion (VI) is a term used to describe indoor air (IA) contamination that occurs due to the migration of chemical vapors in the soil and groundwater. The overall vapor transport process depends on several factors such as contaminant source characteristics, subsurface conditions, building characteristics, and general site conditions. However, the classic VI conceptual model does not adequately account for the physics of airflow around and inside a building and does not account for chemical emissions from alternative "preferential" pathways (e.g. sewers and other utility connections) into IA spaces. This mini-review provides information about recent research related to building air exchange rates (AERs) and alternative pathways to improve the accuracy of VI exposure risk assessment practices. First, results from a recently published AER study for residential homes across the United States (US) are presented and compared to AERs recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The comparison shows considerable differences in AERs when season, location, building age, and other factors are considered. These differences could directly impact VI assessments by influencing IA concentration measurements. Second, a conceptual model for sewer gas entry into buildings is presented and a summary of published field studies is reported. The results of the field studies suggest that alternative pathways for vapors to enter indoor spaces warrant consideration. Ultimately, the information presented in this mini-review can be incorporated into a multiple-lines-of-evidence approach for assessing site-specific VI exposure risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27837600      PMCID: PMC5789807          DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Health        ISSN: 0048-7554            Impact factor:   3.458


  9 in total

1.  Identification of Alternative Vapor Intrusion Pathways Using Controlled Pressure Testing, Soil Gas Monitoring, and Screening Model Calculations.

Authors:  Yuanming Guo; Chase Holton; Hong Luo; Paul Dahlen; Kyle Gorder; Erik Dettenmaier; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Effect of vapor source-building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model.

Authors:  Lilian D V Abreu; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Temporal variability of indoor air concentrations under natural conditions in a house overlying a dilute chlorinated solvent groundwater plume.

Authors:  Chase Holton; Hong Luo; Paul Dahlen; Kyle Gorder; Erik Dettenmaier; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Application of CSIA to distinguish between vapor intrusion and indoor sources of VOCs.

Authors:  Thomas McHugh; Tomasz Kuder; Stephanie Fiorenza; Kyle Gorder; Erik Dettenmaier; Paul Philp
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Identifying housing and meteorological conditions influencing residential air exchange rates in the DEARS and RIOPA studies: development of distributions for human exposure modeling.

Authors:  Kristin Isaacs; Janet Burke; Luther Smith; Ronald Williams
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Simulating the effect of aerobic biodegradation on soil vapor intrusion into buildings: influence of degradation rate, source concentration, and depth.

Authors:  Lilian D V Abreu; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Sewer Gas: An Indoor Air Source of PCE to Consider During Vapor Intrusion Investigations.

Authors:  Kelly G Pennell; Madeleine Kangsen Scammell; Michael D McClean; Jennifer Ames; Brittany Weldon; Leigh Friguglietti; Eric M Suuberg; Rui Shen; Paul A Indeglia; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.019

8.  Simulation of the Vapor Intrusion Process for Non-Homogeneous Soils Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model.

Authors:  Ozgur Bozkurt; Kelly G Pennell; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.019

9.  Development and application of a three-dimensional finite element vapor intrusion model.

Authors:  Kelly G Pennell; Ozgur Bozkurt; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.235

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  US residential building air exchange rates: new perspectives to improve decision making at vapor intrusion sites.

Authors:  Rivka Reichman; Elham Shirazi; Donald G Colliver; Kelly G Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.238

2.  Observation of Conditions Preceding Peak Indoor Air Volatile Org Compound Concentrations in Vapor Intrusion Studies.

Authors:  Chris Lutes; Chase Holton; Brian Schumacher; John Zimmerman; Andrew Kondash; Robert Truesdale
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.019

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.