F Coperchini1, O Awwad2, M Rotondi1, F Santini3, M Imbriani4, L Chiovato5. 1. Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors Fondazione, Salvatore Maugeri I.R.C.C.S., Chair of Endocrinology, University of Pavia, Via Maugeri 10, 27100, Pavia, Italy. 2. Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 3. Endocrinology Unit 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 4. Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 5. Unit of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Laboratory for Endocrine Disruptors Fondazione, Salvatore Maugeri I.R.C.C.S., Chair of Endocrinology, University of Pavia, Via Maugeri 10, 27100, Pavia, Italy. luca.chiovato@fsm.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are two fluorinated compounds widely used in industry because of their useful chemical characteristics. They were identified as endocrine disruptors due to their ability to interfere with thyroid function. The resistance of PFOA and PFOS to environmental degradation, their bio-accumulation in food chains, and their long half-life raised concern in the scientific community, and several studies were performed with the aim to establish the real dangerousness of these compounds for the human health. PURPOSE: The present review will focus on the effects of PFOA and PFOS on the thyroid gland taking into account in vitro experiments, animal studies, and human data. PFOS and PFOA reduce the circulating levels of thyroid hormones in diet-exposed animals, mainly by increasing their metabolic clearance rate. CONCLUSIONS: An accumulation of PFOS and PFOA was documented in thyroid cells, and a cytotoxic effect was observed after exposure to extremely high concentrations of these compounds. In environmentally exposed communities and in the general population, the most consistent effect of exposure to PFOA, and to a less extent to PFOS, is the occurrence of hypothyroidism. Women and children appear to be more at risk of developing mild thyroid failure. Pregnant women with circulating thyroid antibodies might be at risk of developing subclinical hypothyroidism, mainly when exposed at high doses of PFOS. The relative risks for thyroid cancer in people exposed to PFOA and PFOS were low and based on a few cases. Moreover, there was no consistent finding across all or even most studies.
BACKGROUND:Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are two fluorinated compounds widely used in industry because of their useful chemical characteristics. They were identified as endocrine disruptors due to their ability to interfere with thyroid function. The resistance of PFOA and PFOS to environmental degradation, their bio-accumulation in food chains, and their long half-life raised concern in the scientific community, and several studies were performed with the aim to establish the real dangerousness of these compounds for the human health. PURPOSE: The present review will focus on the effects of PFOA and PFOS on the thyroid gland taking into account in vitro experiments, animal studies, and human data. PFOS and PFOA reduce the circulating levels of thyroid hormones in diet-exposed animals, mainly by increasing their metabolic clearance rate. CONCLUSIONS: An accumulation of PFOS and PFOA was documented in thyroid cells, and a cytotoxic effect was observed after exposure to extremely high concentrations of these compounds. In environmentally exposed communities and in the general population, the most consistent effect of exposure to PFOA, and to a less extent to PFOS, is the occurrence of hypothyroidism. Women and children appear to be more at risk of developing mild thyroid failure. Pregnant women with circulating thyroid antibodies might be at risk of developing subclinical hypothyroidism, mainly when exposed at high doses of PFOS. The relative risks for thyroid cancer in people exposed to PFOA and PFOS were low and based on a few cases. Moreover, there was no consistent finding across all or even most studies.
Authors: N Wieneke; F Neuschäfer-Rube; L M Bode; M Kuna; J Andres; L C Carnevali; K I Hirsch-Ernst; G P Püschel Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Clifford R Elcombe; Barbara M Elcombe; John R Foster; Shu-Ching Chang; David J Ehresman; John L Butenhoff Journal: Toxicology Date: 2012-01-08 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Srishti Shrestha; Michael S Bloom; Recai Yucel; Richard F Seegal; Qian Wu; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Robert Rej; Edward F Fitzgerald Journal: Environ Int Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Stephanie J Frisbee; A Paul Brooks; Arthur Maher; Patsy Flensborg; Susan Arnold; Tony Fletcher; Kyle Steenland; Anoop Shankar; Sarah S Knox; Cecil Pollard; Joel A Halverson; Verónica M Vieira; Chuanfang Jin; Kevin M Leyden; Alan M Ducatman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-07-13 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Nicholas J Herkert; Christopher D Kassotis; Sharon Zhang; Yuling Han; Vivek Francis Pulikkal; Mei Sun; P Lee Ferguson; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: F Coperchini; L Croce; P Pignatti; G Ricci; D Gangemi; F Magri; M Imbriani; M Rotondi; L Chiovato Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 4.256