K Meehan1, B Clynick2, B Mirzai2,3, P Maslen2, J M Harvey2,3, W N Erber2,3. 1. School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M504), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. katie.meehan@uwa.edu.au. 2. School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M504), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. 3. PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is important for prognostic prediction and the determination of optimal treatment. Current methods rely on protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as gene amplification as determined by in situ hybridisation (ISH). We explored whether quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used for the detection and absolute quantitation of HER2 mRNA. METHODS: Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was performed for HER2 mRNA on 178 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer specimens. HER2 positive, equivocal and negative cases as defined by standard criteria were included and both core biopsies and tissue sections were assessed. RESULTS: HER2 positive cases contained significantly higher levels of HER2 mRNA (169-1,000,000 copies/µl) by ddPCR compared with equivocal (112-139 copies/µl, p = 0.025) and negative cases (6.2-644 copies/µl. p < 0.001). A continuum of transcript quantity was observed but a cutoff of 490 copies/µl distinguished between HER2 positive and negative cases. Results were consistent between core biopsy and tissue sections. CONCLUSIONS: ddPCR can be used to quantify HER2 mRNA transcripts in FFPE breast cancer specimens. Our results highlight the potential of ddPCR on FFPE tissue to be used to accurately quantify HER2 transcripts. Validation in large cohorts will be required to determine a clinically applicable cutoff.
PURPOSE: The humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is important for prognostic prediction and the determination of optimal treatment. Current methods rely on protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as gene amplification as determined by in situ hybridisation (ISH). We explored whether quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used for the detection and absolute quantitation of HER2 mRNA. METHODS: Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was performed for HER2 mRNA on 178 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer specimens. HER2 positive, equivocal and negative cases as defined by standard criteria were included and both core biopsies and tissue sections were assessed. RESULTS:HER2 positive cases contained significantly higher levels of HER2 mRNA (169-1,000,000 copies/µl) by ddPCR compared with equivocal (112-139 copies/µl, p = 0.025) and negative cases (6.2-644 copies/µl. p < 0.001). A continuum of transcript quantity was observed but a cutoff of 490 copies/µl distinguished between HER2 positive and negative cases. Results were consistent between core biopsy and tissue sections. CONCLUSIONS: ddPCR can be used to quantify HER2 mRNA transcripts in FFPE breast cancer specimens. Our results highlight the potential of ddPCR on FFPE tissue to be used to accurately quantify HER2 transcripts. Validation in large cohorts will be required to determine a clinically applicable cutoff.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Digital droplet PCR; Human epidermal growth factor receptor
Authors: Michael F Press; Guido Sauter; Leslie Bernstein; Ivonne E Villalobos; Martina Mirlacher; Jian-Yuan Zhou; Rooba Wardeh; Yong-Tian Li; Roberta Guzman; Yanling Ma; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Angela Santiago; Jinha M Park; Alessandro Riva; Dennis J Slamon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nicholas J Heredia; Phillip Belgrader; Shenglong Wang; Ryan Koehler; Jack Regan; Angela M Cosman; Serge Saxonov; Benjamin Hindson; Stephanie C Tanner; Alexandra S Brown; George Karlin-Neumann Journal: Methods Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 3.608
Authors: Benjamin J Hindson; Kevin D Ness; Donald A Masquelier; Phillip Belgrader; Nicholas J Heredia; Anthony J Makarewicz; Isaac J Bright; Michael Y Lucero; Amy L Hiddessen; Tina C Legler; Tyler K Kitano; Michael R Hodel; Jonathan F Petersen; Paul W Wyatt; Erin R Steenblock; Pallavi H Shah; Luc J Bousse; Camille B Troup; Jeffrey C Mellen; Dean K Wittmann; Nicholas G Erndt; Thomas H Cauley; Ryan T Koehler; Austin P So; Simant Dube; Klint A Rose; Luz Montesclaros; Shenglong Wang; David P Stumbo; Shawn P Hodges; Steven Romine; Fred P Milanovich; Helen E White; John F Regan; George A Karlin-Neumann; Christopher M Hindson; Serge Saxonov; Bill W Colston Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Noélia Custódio; Rosina Savisaar; Célia Carvalho; Pedro Bak-Gordon; Maria I Ribeiro; Joana Tavares; Paula B Nunes; Ana Peixoto; Carla Pinto; Carla Escudeiro; Manuel R Teixeira; Maria Carmo-Fonseca Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-01-18