Literature DB >> 27837338

Analysis of debrided and non-debrided invasive squamous cell carcinoma skin lesions by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy before and after therapy.

Wenzhong Xiang1, Jianzhong Peng2, Xiuzu Song2, Aie Xu2, Zhigang Bi3.   

Abstract

Hyperkeratosis hinders the application of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to image squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Not all lesions with SCC show hyperkeratosis, and these lesions can be directly imaged. However, lesions with hyperkeratosis can be treated by debriding the hyperkeratotic surface for further imaging. RCM was used to investigate patients with suspected SCC. Lesions without obvious keratosis underwent direct RCM examinations. Lesions with obvious keratosis were treated by debriding the hyperkeratotic surface. The following main RCM criteria were used to diagnose invasive SCC: atypical keratinocytes arranged in nests, islands, and disarrangement patterns; an atypical honeycomb pattern; the absence of a cobblestone pattern; and non-edged dermal papillae. Other characteristics of invasive SCC observed by confocal microscopy included keratin pearl structures, hyperkeratosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration. During the follow-up period after treatment, both the cobblestone pattern and edged dermal papillae were as important as the typical honeycomb pattern in suggesting a normal skin structure. Our findings indicate RCM is a valuable tool to noninvasively examine the histology of invasive SCC before and after therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cobblestone pattern; Dermal papillae; Honeycomb pattern; Reflectance confocal microscopy; Squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837338     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-2104-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  14 in total

1.  Clinical applicability of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of actinic keratoses.

Authors:  Martina Ulrich; Adrienne Maltusch; Francisca Rius-Diaz; Joachim Röwert-Huber; Salvador González; Wolfram Sterry; Eggert Stockfleth; Susanne Astner
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 2.  Reflectance confocal microscopy for in vivo skin imaging.

Authors:  Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton; Caterina Longo; Marina Venturini; Raffaella Sala; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Concordance between in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy and histology in the evaluation of plaque psoriasis.

Authors:  M Ardigo; C Cota; E Berardesca; S González
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  In vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy of hypopigmented macules: a preliminary comparison of confocal images in vitiligo, nevus depigmentosus and postinflammatory hypopigmentation.

Authors:  Wenzhong Xiang; Aie Xu; Jin Xu; Zhigang Bi; Yingbin Shang; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Confocal laser microscopic imaging of actinic keratoses in vivo: a preliminary report.

Authors:  D Aghassi; R R Anderson; S González
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  The kinetics of skin cancer: progression of actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron Fuchs; Ellen Marmur
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.398

7.  Reflectance confocal microscopy criteria for squamous cell carcinomas and actinic keratoses.

Authors:  Ayelet Rishpon; Nancy Kim; Alon Scope; Leeor Porges; Margaret C Oliviero; Ralph P Braun; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Christi Alessi Fox; Harold S Rabinovitz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-07

8.  Differentiation between actinic keratoses and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratoses with reflectance confocal microscopy.

Authors:  M Ulrich; T Forschner; J Röwert-Huber; S González; E Stockfleth; W Sterry; S Astner
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Is confocal microscopy a valuable tool in diagnosing nodular lesions? A study of 140 cases.

Authors:  C Longo; F Farnetani; S Ciardo; A M Cesinaro; E Moscarella; G Ponti; I Zalaudek; G Argenziano; G Pellacani
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 10.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in dermatology.

Authors:  Anca L Branzan; Michael Landthaler; Rolf-Markus Szeimies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.555

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of Skin Electrical Injury Using Infrared Imaging: A Possible Complementary Tool for Histological Examination.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Wei Lin; Hancheng Lin; Zhenyuan Wang; Hongmei Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Ultrasound and Infrared-Based Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Diseases.

Authors:  Sheliza Halani; F Stuart Foster; Maksym Breslavets; Neil H Shear
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography for actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma: a descriptive study.

Authors:  E Cinotti; L Tognetti; A Cartocci; A Lamberti; S Gherbassi; C Orte Cano; C Lenoir; G Dejonckheere; G Diet; M Fontaine; M Miyamoto; J Perez-Anker; V Solmi; J Malvehy; V Del Marmol; J L Perrot; P Rubegni; M Suppa
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.