Roberto Ghiselli1, Monica Ortenzi2, Luca Cardinali1, Edlira Skrami3, Rosaria Gesuita3, Mario Guerrieri1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy. 2. Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy. monica.ortenzi@gmail.com. 3. Interdepartmental "Epidemilogia, Biostatistica e Informatica Medica (EBI)" Centre, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients who exhibit a complete clinical response after radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer, the standard surgical approach might constitute overtreatment. The aim of this study is to analyse the outcomes of anorectal function and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in irradiated patients with complete clinical response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014, 84 patients who were diagnosed with stage T2-T3-T4 N0 rectal cancer before chemoradiotherapy showed a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy and underwent TEM. All patients were evaluated before and 1 year after TEM using the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FIS) questionnaire to determine the impact of this surgical technique on the degree of faecal continence. To assess the quality of life of patients after surgery, we administered the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients exhibited a worse incontinence status after surgical intervention (27.4; 95% CI 18.2-38.2). These patients experienced a median positive absolute variation in the CCF-FIS of four points (95% CI 3.5-4.5; p < 0.001). Female sex and age showed a significant correlation with the worsening of continence status. Scores on the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Index Scale did not show a significant difference before and after TEM. CONCLUSIONS: TEM may be an alternative treatment for patients with rectal cancer who exhibit a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy because it offers the possibility to achieve a full thickness excision of the rectal wall. TEM also allows the identification of any residual disease and provides optimal quality of life and functional results.
BACKGROUND: In patients who exhibit a complete clinical response after radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer, the standard surgical approach might constitute overtreatment. The aim of this study is to analyse the outcomes of anorectal function and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in irradiated patients with complete clinical response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014, 84 patients who were diagnosed with stage T2-T3-T4 N0 rectal cancer before chemoradiotherapy showed a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy and underwent TEM. All patients were evaluated before and 1 year after TEM using the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FIS) questionnaire to determine the impact of this surgical technique on the degree of faecal continence. To assess the quality of life of patients after surgery, we administered the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients exhibited a worse incontinence status after surgical intervention (27.4; 95% CI 18.2-38.2). These patients experienced a median positive absolute variation in the CCF-FIS of four points (95% CI 3.5-4.5; p < 0.001). Female sex and age showed a significant correlation with the worsening of continence status. Scores on the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Index Scale did not show a significant difference before and after TEM. CONCLUSIONS: TEM may be an alternative treatment for patients with rectal cancer who exhibit a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy because it offers the possibility to achieve a full thickness excision of the rectal wall. TEM also allows the identification of any residual disease and provides optimal quality of life and functional results.
Authors: T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: E Kapiteijn; C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; H Putter; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; L Pahlman; B Glimelius; J H van Krieken; J W Leer; C J van de Velde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: W G Lewis; I G Martin; M E Williamson; B M Stephenson; P J Holdsworth; P J Finan; D Johnston Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: P G Doornebosch; M P Gosselink; P A Neijenhuis; W R Schouten; R A E M Tollenaar; E J R de Graaf Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.469