Literature DB >> 27837298

Comparing measurement methods using linear least squares regression.

Lars Øivind Høiseth1,2, Jostein S Hagemo3,4.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27837298     DOI： 10.1007/s10877-016-9955-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN： 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Authors:  Huang Li; Lester A H Critchley; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method.

Authors:  Alexander Hapfelmeier; Maurizio Cecconi; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The Precision of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Bolus Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements Varies With the Clinical Situation.

Authors:  Idar Kirkeby-Garstad; Håkon Trønnes; Roar Stenseth; Olav F M Sellevold; Petter Aadahl; Eirik Skogvoll
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Regression towards the mean.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04

Review 5.  Some examples of regression towards the mean.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.