Literature DB >> 27837213

[Prosthetic treatment of nasal septal perforations : Results with custom-made silicone buttons].

K Zaoui1, M H Schneider2, O Neuner3, P A Federspil4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perforations of the nasal septum can be very disturbing for patients due to increased crust formation, nose bleeds, obstruction of nasal breathing and whistling sounds during nasal breathing. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the symptom burden can be alleviated by custom-made silicone buttons derived from an impression mold.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out to evaluate 45 patients with symptomatic septal perforations, who have been treated over a period of 8 years. The magnitude and localization of the perforations were measured on the impression molds as well as in situ in 28 patients. The symptoms were rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment (response 64%).
RESULTS: No correlation was found between the size of the perforation and the distance from the nasal opening. Of the patients 31 (69%) still had the septal button in situ at the time of the last follow-up. The magnitude and localization of the perforation were not found to be predictors of treatment success. The following symptoms showed a highly significant improvement: crust formation (VAS median 75 vs. 31), nose bleeds (VAS median 50 vs. 0), obstruction of nasal breathing (VAS median 84 vs. 14) and whistling breathing sounds (VAS median 69 vs. 0). Unpleasant odor and symptoms of sinusitis did not show significant changes. The long-term septal button carriers rated the improvement with a median of 91% on the VAS.
CONCLUSION: The success of prosthetic closing of septal perforations by a custom-made button still cannot be accurately predicted. The majority of patients were extraordinarily satisfied because the symptom burden could be significantly reduced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epistaxis; Nasal obstruction; Nasal septal perforation; Quality of life; Septal defect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837213     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0278-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Comments on septoplasty].

Authors:  H-J Schultz-Coulon
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Closure of septum perforation using an individual obturator].

Authors:  H G Kempf; H Weber
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  [Progress in plastic surgery of the nose].

Authors:  R MEYER
Journal:  Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel)       Date:  1951

4.  [The custom made septal button].

Authors:  P A Federspil; M Schneider
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.057

5.  [Management of septal perforations by rotationplasty of the septal mucosa].

Authors:  G Rettinger; H Masing; W Heinl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Prosthetics for nasal perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert J Taylor; David A Sherris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Preliminary results of the new individual made magnet-based nasal septal button.

Authors:  M Teschner; K Willenborg; T Lenarz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Three-layer repair of nasoseptal defects.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Schultz-Coulon
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  [Experience with individual obturators to treat nasal septum perforation].

Authors:  B Al Kadah; S Tengg; J Deimann; M Schneider; B Schick
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 1.057

10.  Computed tomography for constructing custom nasal septal buttons.

Authors:  Daniel L Price; David A Sherris; Eugene B Kern
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.