Literature DB >> 27836885

Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: updated progression-free survival and final overall survival from a phase III randomized study.

S Faivre1, P Niccoli2, D Castellano3, J W Valle4, P Hammel1, J-L Raoul5, A Vinik6, E Van Cutsem7, Y-J Bang8, S-H Lee8, I Borbath9, C Lombard-Bohas10, P Metrakos11, D Smith12, J-S Chen13, P Ruszniewski1, J-F Seitz14, S Patyna15, D R Lu15, K J Ishak16, E Raymond1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a phase III trial in patients with advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib 37.5 mg/day improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (11.4 versus 5.5 months; HR, 0.42; P < 0.001). Here, we present PFS using retrospective blinded independent central review (BICR) and final median overall survival (OS), including an assessment highlighting the impact of patient crossover from placebo to sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, cross-sectional imaging from patients was evaluated retrospectively by blinded third-party radiologists using a two-reader, two-time-point lock, followed by a sequential locked-read, batch-mode paradigm. OS was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Crossover-adjusted OS effect was derived using rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) analyses.
RESULTS: Of 171 randomized patients (sunitinib, n = 86; placebo, n = 85), 160 (94%) had complete scan sets/time points. By BICR, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 12.6 (11.1-20.6) months for sunitinib and 5.8 (3.8-7.2) months for placebo (HR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.55; P = 0.000015). Five years after study closure, median (95% CI) OS was 38.6 (25.6-56.4) months for sunitinib and 29.1 (16.4-36.8) months for placebo (HR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.50-1.06; P = 0.094), with 69% of placebo patients having crossed over to sunitinib. RPSFT analysis confirmed an OS benefit for sunitinib.
CONCLUSIONS: BICR confirmed the doubling of PFS with sunitinib compared with placebo. Although the observed median OS improved by nearly 10 months, the effect estimate did not reach statistical significance, potentially due to crossover from placebo to sunitinib. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00428597.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VEGFR inhibitor; antiangiogenics; blinded independent central review; crossover; rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27836885     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  54 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

Authors:  Zu-Yi Ma; Yuan-Feng Gong; Hong-Kai Zhuang; Zi-Xuan Zhou; Shan-Zhou Huang; Yi-Ping Zou; Bo-Wen Huang; Zhong-Hai Sun; Chuan-Zhao Zhang; Yun-Qiang Tang; Bao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Mohamad Bassam Sonbol; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 3.  Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Mauro Cives; Jonathan Strosberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-03

4.  EPB41L5 is Associated With the Metastatic Potential of Low-grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James Saller; Shabnam Seydafkan; Mohammad Shahid; Manoj Gadara; Mauro Cives; Steven A Eschrich; David Boulware; Jonathan R Strosberg; Nasir Aejaz; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

5.  Diclofenac sex-divergent drug-drug interaction with Sunitinib: pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in male and female mice.

Authors:  Chii Chii Chew; Salby Ng; Yun Lee Chee; Teng Wai Koo; Ming Hui Liew; Evelyn Li-Ching Chee; Pilar Modamio; Cecilia Fernández; Eduardo L Mariño; Ignacio Segarra
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-02

7.  Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Active Treatment with Placebo in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Jaume Capdevila; Jorge Hernando; Santiago Perez-Hoyos; Alejandro Roman-Gonzalez; Enrique Grande
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-22

8.  Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.889

9.  Clinical and functional implication of the components of somatostatin system in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Aura D Herrera-Martínez; Manuel D Gahete; Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo; Rafael Sánchez-Sánchez; Rosa Ortega-Salas; Raquel Serrano-Blanch; Raúl M Luque; María A Gálvez-Moreno; Justo P Castaño
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Therapeutic Options for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reto M Kaderli; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Martin A Walter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.