Chen Zhang1, Yuanying Deng1, Hongmei Dai1, Wenjuan Zhou1, Jing Tian1, Guoying Bing2, Lingling Zhao3. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 2. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, School of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40502, USA. 3. Department of Paediatrics, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. Electronic address: llzhao2011@qq.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a widely used solvent and vehicle for in vivo and in vitro administration of test compounds. Effects of DMSO independent of the test compound, such as in studies examining morphological plasticity or neurotoxic responses, may lead to spurious results. AIM: To investigate effects of DMSO concentration ([DMSO]) on morphology and survival of primary cultured neurons and astrocytes. METHODS: Primary cultured neurons and astrocytes were treated with 0.25%-10.00% [DMSO] for 12-48h. Viable cell number and morphology were compared to untreated cultures using the CCK-8 assay and phase-contrast microscopy. Expression levels of the neuronal marker NeuN and astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were determined by immunofluorescence and western blotting. RESULTS: A [DMSO]≤0.50% had no effect on neuronal number or NeuN expression up to 24h, while ≥1.00% induced a progressive and dramatic loss of both viability and NeuN expression even after 12h. Brief (12h) exposure to ≤1.00% DMSO had no effect on astrocytes survival or GFAP expression, while ≥5.00% significantly reduced both at all exposure durations. In contrast to neurons, exposure to 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO for 24 or 48h enhanced astrocytes proliferation and GFAP expression. Astrocytic processes were maintained at 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO, while neurons exhibited marked neurite retraction at ≥0.50%. CONCLUSION: A [DMSO]≥0.5% markedly disrupts neuronal morphology and reduces viability, even after brief exposure. In astrocytes, 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO appear to induce reactive gliosis. For treatment of neural cells, [DMSO] should be ≤0.25% to obviate spurious vehicle effects.
BACKGROUND:Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a widely used solvent and vehicle for in vivo and in vitro administration of test compounds. Effects of DMSO independent of the test compound, such as in studies examining morphological plasticity or neurotoxic responses, may lead to spurious results. AIM: To investigate effects of DMSO concentration ([DMSO]) on morphology and survival of primary cultured neurons and astrocytes. METHODS: Primary cultured neurons and astrocytes were treated with 0.25%-10.00% [DMSO] for 12-48h. Viable cell number and morphology were compared to untreated cultures using the CCK-8 assay and phase-contrast microscopy. Expression levels of the neuronal marker NeuN and astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were determined by immunofluorescence and western blotting. RESULTS: A [DMSO]≤0.50% had no effect on neuronal number or NeuN expression up to 24h, while ≥1.00% induced a progressive and dramatic loss of both viability and NeuN expression even after 12h. Brief (12h) exposure to ≤1.00% DMSO had no effect on astrocytes survival or GFAP expression, while ≥5.00% significantly reduced both at all exposure durations. In contrast to neurons, exposure to 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO for 24 or 48h enhanced astrocytes proliferation and GFAP expression. Astrocytic processes were maintained at 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO, while neurons exhibited marked neurite retraction at ≥0.50%. CONCLUSION: A [DMSO]≥0.5% markedly disrupts neuronal morphology and reduces viability, even after brief exposure. In astrocytes, 0.50% and 1.00% DMSO appear to induce reactive gliosis. For treatment of neural cells, [DMSO] should be ≤0.25% to obviate spurious vehicle effects.
Authors: Ryan B Griggs; Leonid M Yermakov; Domenica E Drouet; Duc V M Nguyen; Keiichiro Susuki Journal: ASN Neuro Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 4.146
Authors: Anna O'Sullivan; Simona Lange; Peter Rotheneichner; Lara Bieler; Ludwig Aigner; Francisco J Rivera; Sebastien Couillard-Despres Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Ana Y Simão; Joana Gonçalves; Ana Gradillas; Antonia García; José Restolho; Nicolás Fernández; Jesus M Rodilla; Mário Barroso; Ana Paula Duarte; Ana C Cristóvão; Eugenia Gallardo Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Jonas Ort; Benedikt Kremer; Linda Grüßer; Romy Blaumeiser-Debarry; Hans Clusmann; Mark Coburn; Anke Höllig; Ute Lindauer Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Qing-Rong Liu; Nicholas S Huang; Hong Qu; Jennifer F O'Connell; Isabel Gonzalez-Mariscal; Sara Santa-Cruz-Calvo; Maire E Doyle; Zheng-Xiong Xi; Yun Wang; Emmanuel S Onaivi; Josephine M Egan Journal: Acta Pharmacol Sin Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 6.150