Literature DB >> 2783677

Endoscopic measurement of variceal pressure in cirrhosis: correlation with portal pressure and variceal hemorrhage.

J Rigau1, J Bosch, J M Bordas, M Navasa, R Mastai, D Kravetz, J Bruix, F Feu, J Rodés.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical application of a pressure-sensitive gauge that allows the noninvasive measurement of the pressure of esophageal varices at endoscopy. The study was performed in 70 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Among them, 47 had bled from the varices and 23 had varices but had not bled. In addition to measurements of variceal pressure, the size of the varices was estimated semiquantitatively at endoscopy. This allowed an estimate of the tension on the wall of the varices as the product of the transmural pressure and the estimated radius of the varices. Most patients had a standard hemodynamic evaluation of portal hypertension, with measurements of wedged and free hepatic venous pressures, and of azygos blood flow. These were performed within 24 h of the variceal pressure measurements. Variceal pressure was significantly higher in bleeders than in nonbleeders (15.7 +/- 2.8 vs. 12.1 +/- 2.6 mmHg, p less than 0.001) in spite of a similar portal pressure in both groups (20.1 +/- 5.1 vs. 20.4 +/- 7.6 mmHg, NS). More than 60% of the bleeders, but only 22% of the nonbleeders had a variceal pressure greater than or equal to 15 mmHg (p less than 0.005). Among nonbleeders, variceal pressure was higher in patients with large varices (13.9 +/- 2 mmHg, n = 9) than in those with small varices (10.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg, n = 14) (p less than 0.01). Estimates of variceal wall tension further exaggerated the differences between bleeders and nonbleeders (66.1 +/- 22.6 vs. 32.0 +/- 19.8 mmHg.mm, p less than 0.001). More than 50% of bleeders, but just 9% of nonbleeders had an estimated variceal tension greater than 50 mmHg.mm (p less than 0.001). Our findings support the role of an increased variceal pressure in the pathogenesis of variceal hemorrhage, and suggest that this noninvasive technique can be valuable in assessing the risk of variceal hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  19 in total

Review 1.  Duplex Doppler ultrasound examination of the portal venous system: an emerging novel technique for the estimation of portal vein pressure.

Authors:  Ashwani K Singal; Masood Ahmad; Roger D Soloway
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The significance of esophageal variceal pressure in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  T Yoshida; T Bandoh; S Kitano; K Shuto; K Ninomiya; Y Mitarai; M Kobayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Endoscopic management of esophageal varices.

Authors:  Joaquin Poza Cordon; Consuelo Froilan Torres; Aurora Burgos García; Francisco Gea Rodriguez; Jose Manuel Suárez de Parga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-16

Review 4.  Evolution in the understanding of the pathophysiological basis of portal hypertension: How changes in paradigm are leading to successful new treatments.

Authors:  Jaume Bosch; Roberto J Groszmann; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Noninvasive variceal pressure measurement may be useful for predicting effect of sclerotherapy for esophageal varices.

Authors:  K Ueno; M Hashizume; M Ohta; M Tomikawa; S Kitano; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Invasive and non-invasive techniques for detecting portal hypertension and predicting variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Zardi; Francesco Maria Di Matteo; Claudio Maurizio Pacella; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  Prevalence of endoscopic findings in 510 consecutive individuals with cirrhosis evaluated prospectively.

Authors:  M Rabinovitz; Y K Yoo; R R Schade; V J Dindzans; D H Van Thiel; J S Gavaler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Intraperitoneal haemorrhage from anterior abdominal wall varices.

Authors:  J B Hunt; M Appleyard; M Thursz; P D Carey; P J Guillou; H C Thomas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Mechanisms and consequences of portal hypertension.

Authors:  P M MacMathuna
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Assessment of variceal pressure by continuous non-invasive endoscopic registration: a placebo controlled evaluation of the effect of terlipressin and octreotide.

Authors:  F Nevens; W Van Steenbergen; S H Yap; J Fevery
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.