Literature DB >> 27836647

Corrective effect of diaphragm pacing on the decrease in cardiac output induced by positive pressure mechanical ventilation in anesthetized sheep.

Hicham Masmoudi1, Romain Persichini2, Jérôme Cecchini3, Julie Delemazure2, Martin Dres3, Julien Mayaux2, Alexandre Demoule3, Jalal Assouad1, Thomas Similowski4.   

Abstract

Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a fundamental life support measure, but it decreases cardiac output (CO). Diaphragmatic contractions produce negative intrathoracic and positive abdominal pressures, promoting splanchnic venous return. We hypothesized that: 1) diaphragm pacing alone could produce adequate ventilation without decreasing CO; 2) diaphragm pacing on top of PPV could improve CO. Of 11 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated ewes (39.6±5.9kg), 3 were discarded from analysis because of hemodynamic instability during the experiment, and 8 retained for analysis. Phrenic stimulation electrodes were inserted in the diaphragm (implanted phrenic nerve stimulation, iPS). CO was measured by the thermodilution technique (pulmonary artery catheter). CO during end-expiratory apnea served as reference. Median CO was 9.77 [6.25-11.25] lmin-1 during end-expiratory apnea, 8.25 [5.06-9.25] lmin-1 during "PPV" (-15%) (p<0.05), 9.19 [5.60-10.19] lmin-1 during "PPV-iPS" (NS vs apnea) and 9.37 [6.12-10.48] lmin-1 during "iPS" (NS vs. apnea). iPS-driven ventilation was comparable to its PPV counterpart (median 92% [74-97], NS). Diaphragm pacing alone can produce adequate ventilation without reducing CO. Superimposed onto PPV, diaphragm pacing can reduce the PPV-induced decrease in CO.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Diaphragm; Hemodynamics; Phrenic stimulation; Positive pressure ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836647     DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol        ISSN: 1569-9048            Impact factor:   1.931


  5 in total

1.  Restoring Ventilatory Control Using an Adaptive Bioelectronic System.

Authors:  Ricardo Siu; James J Abbas; Brian K Hillen; Jefferson Gomes; Stefany Coxe; Jonathan Castelli; Sylvie Renaud; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Phrenic nerve stimulation to protect the diaphragm, lung, and brain during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Idunn S Morris; Martin Dres; Ewan C Goligher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 41.787

3.  Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Douglas Evans; Deborah Shure; Linda Clark; Gerard J Criner; Martin Dres; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Franco Laghi; David McDonagh; Basil Petrof; Teresa Nelson; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Transvenous Diaphragm Neurostimulation Mitigates Ventilation-associated Brain Injury.

Authors:  Thiago G Bassi; Elizabeth C Rohrs; Karl C Fernandez; Marlena Ornowska; Michelle Nicholas; Matt Gani; Doug Evans; Steven C Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in an ovine model with temporary removable pacing leads.

Authors:  Harry Etienne; Martin Dres; Julie Piquet; Laure Wingertsmann; Olivier Thibaudeau; Thomas Similowski; Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo; Jalal Assouad
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.005

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.