Literature DB >> 27836496

Differences in outcome for cervical cancer patients treated with or without brachytherapy.

Johannes Karlsson1, Ann-Charlotte Dreifaldt1, Louise Bohr Mordhorst1, Bengt Sorbe2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcome of cervical cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy with and without the addition of brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In all, 220 patients with cervical cancer stage I-IV treated between 1993 and 2009 were included. Three or five 6.0 Gy fractions of brachytherapy were given in addition to the external beam radiotherapy to 134 patients, whereas 86 patients received external beam radiotherapy alone (EBRTA). In the EBRTA group, the patients received external boost instead of brachytherapy with a total dose to the tumor of 64-72 Gy.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates of the complete series were 42.5% and 55.5%, respectively. The rates of primary complete remission, 5-year cancer-specific survival, and recurrence were 92.5%, 68.5%, and 31.3% for the brachytherapy group vs. 73.3%, 35.4%, and 37.2% for the EBRTA group. The survival (all types) of the patients receiving brachytherapy was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than for the patients treated with external boost, but the difference was most pronounced in FIGO stage II tumors. Higher FIGO stage, nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology, treatment with EBRTA, and lower total equal 2-Gy (EQD2) external dose were significantly associated with poorer survival, lower rate of remission, and higher recurrence rate in multivariate models.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumor remission rate, recurrence rate, and all types of survival rates were improved in the brachytherapy group. Brachytherapy is important to achieve sufficient doses to the periphery and central part of the tumor and should always be considered in treatment of cervical carcinomas.
Copyright © 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; Cervical cancer; External beam radiotherapy; Prognosis; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836496     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  23 in total

Review 1.  Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Authors:  Zhongshan Liu; Yangzhi Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Jing Sun; Xia Lin; Tiejun Wang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost in Patients With Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Facondo; Gianluca Vullo; Vitaliana DE Sanctis; Maurizio Valeriani; Anna Maria Ascolese; Maria Massaro; Dimitri Anzellini; Mattia Falchetto Osti
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-05-03

3.  Socioeconomic and Racial Determinants of Brachytherapy Utilization for Cervical Cancer: Concerns for Widening Disparities.

Authors:  David Boyce-Fappiano; Kevin A Nguyen; Olsi Gjyshi; Gohar Manzar; Chike O Abana; Ann H Klopp; Mitchell Kamrava; Peter F Orio; Nikhil G Thaker; Firas Mourtada; Puja Venkat; Albert J Chang
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Radiosensitization using hydrogen peroxide in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Anneyuko I Saito; Taira Mitsuhashi; Tatsuya Inoue; Tsuyoshi Ota; Takafumi Ujihira; Koyo Yoshida; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-23

5.  Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.

Authors:  Bridget A Quinn; Xiaoyan Deng; Adrianne Colton; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Jori S Carter; Emma C Fields
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

7.  The Impact of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Measuring Clinical Outcomes in the Primary Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jiheon Song; Najlaa Alyamani; Gaurav Bhattacharya; Tien Le; Choan E; Rajiv Samant
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  Topical estrogen, testosterone, and vaginal dilator in the prevention of vaginal stenosis after radiotherapy in women with cervical cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jumara Martins; Ana Francisca Vaz; Regina Celia Grion; Lúcia Costa-Paiva; Luiz Francisco Baccaro
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  From IB2 to IIIB locally advanced cervical cancers: report of a ten-year experience.

Authors:  Sophie Espenel; Max-Adrien Garcia; Jane-Chloé Trone; Elodie Guillaume; Annabelle Harris; Amel Rehailia-Blanchard; Ming Yuan He; Sarra Ouni; Alexis Vallard; Chloé Rancoule; Majed Ben Mrad; Céline Chauleur; Guy De Laroche; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Pablo Moreno-Acosta; Nicolas Magné
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Brachytherapy during the coronavirus disease 2019 - Lessons from Iran.

Authors:  Mahdi Aghili; Fatemeh Jafari; Mojtaba Vand Rajabpoor
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.