| Literature DB >> 27836436 |
Daniëlle Nijsten1, Hans Houweling2, Antoine Durupt3, Alex Adjagba3.
Abstract
National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are facing increasingly complex vaccination issues together with a lack of human resources for evidence assessment and data analysis. One way to reduce these burdens could be to share some of the preparatory work across NITAGs. We conducted an inventory of all the advisory reports issued by five well-established European NITAGs from 2011 to 2014 to assess overlaps in issues and activities. A total of 104 advisory reports were retrieved. Advisory reports on the same issues were compared to identify overlapping activities and processes. Advisory reports issued by the five NITAGs showed little overlap in issues and processes. A first step towards efficient collaboration would be to establish an independent platform to provide insight into each NITAG's work and to facilitate the exchange of agendas, assessment frameworks and evidence. Copyright ÂEntities:
Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Immunization recommendation; Methodology; NITAG; Public health; Vaccination
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27836436 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641