Literature DB >> 27836349

LCA of emerging technologies: addressing high uncertainty on inputs' variability when performing global sensitivity analysis.

Martino Lacirignola1, Philippe Blanc2, Robin Girard3, Paula Pérez-López2, Isabelle Blanc2.   

Abstract

In the life cycle assessment (LCA) context, global sensitivity analysis (GSA) has been identified by several authors as a relevant practice to enhance the understanding of the model's structure and ensure reliability and credibility of the LCA results. GSA allows establishing a ranking among the input parameters, according to their influence on the variability of the output. Such feature is of high interest in particular when aiming at defining parameterized LCA models. When performing a GSA, the description of the variability of each input parameter may affect the results. This aspect is critical when studying new products or emerging technologies, where data regarding the model inputs are very uncertain and may cause misleading GSA outcomes, such as inappropriate input rankings. A systematic assessment of this sensitivity issue is now proposed. We develop a methodology to analyze the sensitivity of the GSA results (i.e. the stability of the ranking of the inputs) with respect to the description of such inputs of the model (i.e. the definition of their inherent variability). With this research, we aim at enriching the debate on the application of GSA to LCAs affected by high uncertainties. We illustrate its application with a case study, aiming at the elaboration of a simple model expressing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) as a function of few key parameters. Our methodology allows identifying the key inputs of the LCA model, taking into account the uncertainty related to their description.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced geothermal systems; Environmental model; Global sensitivity analysis; Life cycle assessment; Sobol indices

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836349     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Incorporating upstream emissions into electric sector nitrogen oxide reduction targets.

Authors:  Samaneh Babaee; Daniel H Loughlin; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Clean Eng Technol       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of Background Life Cycle Inventories.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kim; Christopher L Mutel; Andreas Froemelt; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Recyclability Definition of Recycled Nanofiltration Membranes through a Life Cycle Perspective and Carbon Footprint Indicator.

Authors:  Jorge Senán-Salinas; Junkal Landaburu-Aguirre; Raquel García-Pacheco; Eloy García-Calvo
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 4.  A Content Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Nanomaterials: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Nurul Umairah M Nizam; Marlia M Hanafiah; Kok Sin Woon
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.