Literature DB >> 27836116

Effect of layer thickness on the elution of bulk-fill composite components.

Lena Rothmund1, Franz-Xaver Reichl1, Reinhard Hickel2, Panorea Styllou1, Marianthi Styllou1, Kai Kehe3, Yang Yang1, Christof Högg4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An increment layering technique in a thickness of 2mm or less has been the standard to sufficiently convert (co)monomers. Bulk fill resin composites were developed to accelerate the restoration process by enabling up to 4mm thick increments to be cured in a single step. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the elution of components from bulk fill composites.
METHODS: The composites ELS Bulk fill, SDR Bulk fill and Venus Bulkfill were polymerized according to the instruction of the manufacturers. For each composite three groups with four samples each (n=4) were prepared: (1) samples with a layer thickness of 2mm; (2) samples with a layer thickness of 4mm and (3) samples with a layer thickness of 6mm. The samples were eluted in methanol and water for 24h and 7 d. The eluates were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
RESULTS: A total of 11 different elutable substances have been identified from the investigated composites. Following methacrylates showed an increase of elution at a higher layer thickness: TEGDMA (SDR Bulk fill, Venus Bulk fill), EGDMA (Venus Bulk fill). There was no significant difference in the elution of HEMA regarding the layer thickness. The highest concentration of TEGDMA was 146μg/mL for SDR Bulk fill at a layer thickness of 6mm after 7 d in water. The highest HEMA concentration measured at 108μg/mL was detected in the methanol eluate of Venus Bulk fill after 7 d with a layer thickness of 6mm. SIGNIFICANCE: A layer thickness of 4mm or more can lead to an increased elution of some bulk fill components, compared to the elution at a layer thickness of 2mm.
Copyright © 2016 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk-fill composite; Comonomer; Elution; Layer thickness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836116     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Factors influencing clinical application of bulk-fill composite resin].

Authors:  Jing Xue
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  The polymerization efficiency of a bulk-fill composite based on matrix-modification technology.

Authors:  Tarek M Elshazly; Christoph Bourauel; Moustafa N Aboushelib; Dalia I Sherief; Dalia I El-Korashy
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  Effect of Adhesive Resin as a Modeling Liquid on Elution of Resin Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Maalekipour; Mehri Safari; Mehrdad Barekatain; Amirhossein Fathi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-28

4.  Thermal Stability and Monomer Elution of Bulk Fill Composite Resins Cured from Different Irradiation Distances.

Authors:  Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Fatemeh Pournaghi Azar; Sajjad Keshipour; Saba Nadervand
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-04-07

5.  Renewal MI Dental Composite Etch and Seal Properties.

Authors:  Nabih Alkhouri; Wendy Xia; Paul F Ashley; Anne M Young
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 6.  Meta-analytical analysis on components released from resin-based dental materials.

Authors:  Francesco De Angelis; Nela Sarteur; Michal Šteffl; Camillo D'Arcangelo; Matteo Buonvivere; Mirco Vadini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.