Literature DB >> 27836087

Using routine health data and intermittent community surveys to assess the impact of maternal and neonatal health interventions in low-income countries: A systematic review.

Nissou I Dossa1, Aline Philibert2, Alexandre Dumont3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need to provide increased evidence on effective interventions to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the breadth of knowledge on using routine data (Routine Health Information Systems [RHIS] and Intermittent Community Surveys [ICS]) for well-designed maternal and neonatal health evaluations in LMICs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched reports and articles published in Embase, Medline, and Google scholar. Selection criteria Studies were considered for inclusion if they were carried out in LMICs, using RHIS or ICS data with experimental or quasi-experimental design. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A form was used to collect information on indicators used for interventions' impact assessment. Descriptive statistics and multiple correspondence analyses were then performed. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 1201 publications identified, 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of these were using RHIS data (n=40), mainly extracted from health facility registers (n=34), and non-controlled before and after design (n=30). The indicators, which were mostly reported, were related to the use of healthcare services (n=36) and maternal/neonatal health outcomes (n=31). Few studies used ICS data (n=6) or indicators of severity (n=2).
CONCLUSION: RHIS and ICS data should be increasingly used for impact studies on maternal and neonatal health in LMICs.
Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Community survey; Impact evaluation; LMICs; Maternal health; Neonatal health; Routine data

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836087     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

Review 1.  Routine Health Information Systems in the European Context: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Francesc Saigí-Rubió; José Juan Pereyra-Rodríguez; Joan Torrent-Sellens; Hans Eguia; Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; David Novillo-Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Integration of maternal postpartum services in maternal and child health services in Kaya health district (Burkina Faso): an intervention time trend analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Yugbaré Belemsaga; Anne Goujon; Halima Tougri; Abou Coulibaly; Olivier Degomme; Els Duysburgh; Marleen Temmerman; Seni Kouanda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  National Assessment of Data Quality and Associated Systems-Level Factors in Malawi.

Authors:  Richael O'Hagan; Melissa A Marx; Karen E Finnegan; Patrick Naphini; Kumbukani Ng'ambi; Kingsley Laija; Emily Wilson; Lois Park; Sautso Wachepa; Joseph Smith; Lewis Gombwa; Amos Misomali; Tiope Mleme; Simeon Yosefe
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2017-09-28

4.  Comparing individual-level clinical data from antenatal records with routine health information systems indicators for antenatal care in the West Bank: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mahima Venkateswaran; Kjersti Mørkrid; Khadija Abu Khader; Tamara Awwad; Ingrid K Friberg; Buthaina Ghanem; Taghreed Hijaz; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.