Literature DB >> 27835789

A Comparative Performance Analysis of Multispectral and RGB Imaging on HER2 Status Evaluation for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis.

Wenlou Liu1, Linwei Wang1, Jiuyang Liu1, Jingping Yuan2, Jiamei Chen1, Han Wu1, Qingming Xiang1, Guifang Yang3, Yan Li4.   

Abstract

Despite the extensive application of multispectral imaging (MSI) in biomedical multidisciplinary researches, there is a paucity of data available regarding the implication of MSI in tumor prognosis prediction. We compared the behaviors of multispectral (MS) and conventional red-green-blue (RGB) images on assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry to explore their impact on outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer (BC). Tissue microarrays containing 240 BC patients were introduced to compare the performance of MS and RGB imaging methods on the quantitative assessment of HER2 status and the prognostic value of 5-year disease-free survival (5-DFS). Both the total and average signal optical density values of HER2 MS and RGB images were analyzed, and all patients were divided into two groups based on the different 5-DFS. The quantification of HER2 MS images was negatively correlated with 5-DFS in lymph node-negative and -positive patients (P<.05), but RGB images were not in lymph node-positive patients (P=.101). Multivariate analysis indicated that the hazard ratio (HR) of HER2 MS was higher than that of HER2 RGB (HR=2.454; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.636-3.681 vs HR=2.060; 95% CI, 1.361-3.119). Additionally, area under curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis for HER2 MS was greater than that for HER2 RGB (AUC=0.649; 95% CI, 0.577-0.722 vs AUC=0.596; 95% CI, 0.522-0.670) in predicting the risk for recurrence. More importantly, the quantification of HER2 MS images has higher prediction accuracy than that of HER2 RGB images (69.6% vs 65.0%) on 5-DFS. Our study suggested that better information on BC prognosis could be obtained from the quantification of HER2 MS images and MS images might perform better in predicting BC prognosis than conventional RGB images. Copyright Â
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27835789      PMCID: PMC5109258          DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among females worldwide [1]. In China, the incidence of BC has been on a steady rise despite improvements in screening and comprehensive treatment [2]. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), also known as c-erbB-2 or HER2/neu, is a commonly used theranostic biomarker for BCs, which is overexpressed in approximately 20% to 25% of invasive BCs [3], [4], [5], [6]. Currently, the HER2-based molecular-targeted therapy plays a tremendous impact on BC prognosis [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, accurate quantitative determination of HER2 status is crucial for the establishment of BC treatment strategy in clinical practice. Two methods are commonly reported for the assessment of HER2 status. One is immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the determination of HER2 protein expression, and the other is fluorescence in situ hybridization for the sensing of HER2 gene [9]. The former is recommended as a primary testing modality, and the latter is considered in ambiguous cause. However, interpreting IHC images by manual assessment is highly experience based and subjective. Additionally, no unified judgment and a lack of reproducibility as well as the potentially drastic variations among inter- and intraobservers further limited this technique [10], [11]. Therefore, an accurate and repeatable quantitative method for IHC images becomes increasingly desirable in clinical histopathology. Computer image analysis of IHC images possessed the promising potential for more consistent interpretation and minimized the influence of subjective human factor compared with manual assessment [10], [12]. However, the image quality would affect the analysis result no matter by pathologist or computer-aided image analysis [13]. Thus, it is a prerequisite to obtain high-quality IHC images and the related accurate quantitative analysis for the assessment of BC prognosis. The conventional red-green-blue (RGB) imaging has been widely used, but their inherent technical limitations such as suboptimal image contrast and sharpness, overlapping chromogenic signals, and strong light effect affected the accuracy and repeatability of IHC image quantification and analysis obviously [14], [15]. To address this issue, multispectral imaging (MSI) systems have been introduced and used for the separation of different cellular components and unmixing of overlapping chromogens [16], [17]. Different from traditional RGB imaging, MSI can capture high-resolution images with a high degree of spectral information and facilitate the extraction of specific chromogen signal from the bright-field image even in the case of spatial and spectral overlap [17], [18], [19]. Moreover, the precise separation and independent quantitation of multiple markers in the subcellular compartments can be realized by MSI combined with advanced cell segmentation software [20]. In our previous study, the utility of MS images in quantitative IHC analysis showed higher sensitivity and accuracy, and better image quality and reliability than standard RGB images [15]. Furthermore, quantum dots–based MSI has been used for the obtainment of prognostic indicators of multiple proteins or genes in the tumor and tumor microenvironment [9], [21], [22]. But little is known concerning the prognostic value of quantitative assessment of bright-field MS images in BC patients. Herein, we employed MS and conventional RGB images for the quantitative analysis of HER2 IHC and compared the results to evaluate their performance in the prediction of BC prognosis.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Specimens

Complete tumor specimens from 240 invasive BC patients from our prospectively established BC database at our cancer center, which has been the source of our recent clinical studies on BC, were selected [9], [23]. Major demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were available, including age, tumor size, lymph node (LN) status, histological grade, hormone receptor status, and HER2 gene status. TNM staging and histological grade were classified according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system [24] and the fourth edition of the WHO histological grade [25]. Major treatment information including types of surgery and adjuvant treatments (chemo/radiotherapy and endocrine therapy) was obtained from the medical records of each patient. The HER2-positive patients did not receive the molecular targeting therapy. All the patients were on regular follow-up schedule, and the complete information on 5-year disease-free survival (5-DFS) was available. Informed consents were obtained from all patients in the database, and the study was approved by the institutional review board and the ethics committee.

Tissue Microarray (TMA) Construction

All hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides were examined by independent reviewers who were blinded from the clinical features or outcomes. BC TMAs were constructed using standard procedures, as previously described [26]. Briefly, two cores were taken from each representative invasive tumor tissue (1.5 mm in diameter for each core). Then, 7 different TMAs sections with 240 tumor tissues were constructed (in collaboration with Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) (Figure 1A1).
Figure 1

Flowchart of study design and major technical procedures. (A1) TMAs with 480 cores of 240 BC specimens were constructed. (A2) Three key molecule biomarkers of BC were stained by routine IHC method, staining HER2 in cell membrane. (B1–B3) The HER2 MS and RGB images were captured by MSI system, and their unmixing and quantification were obtained by CRi Nuance software. (C1–C3) HER2 MS and RGB image analysis outputs were analyzed by X-tile software (C1). All patients were divided into two groups (C2) and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method (C3).

Immunohistochemistry and Evaluation

Immunolocalization of HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) was performed using streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex method. The IHC protocols were described previously [22]. In short (Figure 1A2), seven TMA sections were deparaffinized and dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol solutions. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes. Antigen retrieval was treated by microwave treatment in 0.01 M Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) for 20 minutes. Slides were incubated with primary antibodies of mouse antihuman polyclonal antibody against HER2 (A-0485, Dako, Denmark, dilution 1/50), rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody against ER (sc-7207, Santa Cruz, USA, dilution 1/100), and PR (sc-7208, Santa Cruz, USA, dilution 1/100) for 2 hours at 37°C and then incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (MaiXin Bio Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, China, 1:250 dilution) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Negative control was performed by omitting the primary antibody. Antigen-antibody reaction was visualized with 3,30′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (DAKO, Denmark). After counterstaining with hematoxylin, sections were dehydrated through ascending alcohols. The immunostaining results were determined independently by two expert pathologists (G.F.Y., J.P.Y.) without knowledge of patients' outcomes. The results of HER2 were scored from 0 to 3+ as the criteria described [6], and any discernable signals of ER and/or PR positive in the nucleus were defined as hormone receptor positive [27].

Image Acquisition, Quantification, and Analysis

The digital images of HER2 staining were captured based on 6 photographs for each core of TMAs under Olympus BX51 bright-field microscope equipped with Olympus DP72 RGB camera (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and CRi Nuance multispectral imaging systems (Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Woburn, MA), respectively, at 100× magnification. The images of six photographs were integrated to form a panorama image for each TMAs core. The MS (Figure 1B1, upper panel) and RGB images (Figure 1B3, upper panel) of each core containing both tumor nests and stroma were acquired at the unified image acquisition parameters [15] by two imaging systems. A total of 6 spectral cubes from 420 to 720 nm in 20-nm increments were acquired by MSI system. Finally, 2880 bright-field IHC images of HER2 were obtained including identical 1440 RGB images and 1440 MS images, and all images were saved in Tagged Image File Format with consistent resolution for further analysis. After imaging acquisition, CRi Nuance software V 3.0.0 within MSI system was used for the unmixing and quantification in HER2 MS and RGB images with standard processing. The spectral characteristics (curve) for two chromogens (DAB and hematoxylin) in MS and RGB images were obtained by spectral separation. Detailed steps were previously described [15], [28]. The target images with different spectra were automatically unmixed into DAB (Figure 1, B1 and B3, lower panel) and hematoxylin (data not shown) component images by Nuance software based on spectral library. Nonspecific background signals were subtracted from each image individually. DAB spectral signals of HER2 were automatically quantified. The original results produced by CRi Nuance software were total signal optical density (OD) values for HER2 in one view field. As each TMA core has six view fields, the final quantitative results output was HER2 sum, i.e., signal pixels in six fields altogether. To minimize errors in data interpretation and scoring as well as to improve data quality, average OD values of all the positive staining of HER2 in each image were measured. Once the HER2 total signal OD and average signal OD values in MS and RGB images were calculated, the X-tile software, which was explored and used to identify optimal cut point of biomarkers based on the prognosis by scholars at Yale University in 2004 [29], was applied to automatically identify the cutoff points of total OD and average OD values in HER2 MS and RGB images, and all patients were categorized into two groups according their values (Figure 1, C1–C3).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Institute, Chicago, IL). All numeric values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Correlation test was calculated by Pearson chi-square. The primary end point, 5-DFS, was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of the independent prognosis factors. Two-sided P < .05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

IHC Staining Results in TMAs

The main clinicopathologic characteristics of 240 patients in BC TMAs were presented in Table 1. The median age of patients was 49.5 years (range, 21-89 years), and the average follow-up time was 45.6 months. IHC staining was performed in seven BC TMAs, and the result of each specimen was obtained for images-based digital analysis (Figure 2, A–C). HER2 protein was expressed in cell membrane of tumor cells. Among the 240 patients in this study, 162 (67.4%) cases were scored as 0/1+ HER2, 27 (11.3%) cases were scored as 2+, and 51 (21.3%) cases were scored as 3+ using the visual method. The corresponding MS and RGB images of HER2 were acquired, and some representative IHC images were shown in Figure 2, D–I. Consistent with our previous report [15], HER2 MS images presented better image qualities compared with RGB images for further computer analysis.
Table 1

Major Clinicopathologic Characteristics of 240 Patients in BC TMAs

VariablesPatients (N = 240)%
Age (years)
 ≤5014962.1
 >509137.9
Tumor size (cm)
 T1 (T ≤ 2)3615.0
 T2 (2 < T ≤ 5)16267.5
 T3 (T > 5)4217.5
LNs status
 Positive13154.6
 Negative10945.4
Histological grade
 I4016.7
 II14158.8
 III5924.6
Clinical stage
 I, II16468.3
 III, IV7631.7
Hormone receptor status
 Positive18677.5
 Negative5422.5
HER2 expression
 IHC 3+5121.3
 IHC 2+2711.3
 IHC 0-1+16267.4
HER2 gene status
 Amplification5121.3
 Nonamplification18978.7
Chemotherapy
 Yes19982.9
 No4117.1
Radiotherapy
 Yes4719.6
 No19380.4
Recurrence
 Yes10041.7
 No14058.3

ER and/or PR positive was defined as hormone receptor positive, which was determined by immunohistochemical staining according to guideline [27].

HER2 gene was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization according to guideline [6].

Figure 2

Immunohistological findings in BC TMAs. (A–C) Representative examples of HER2 scored as 1+, 2+, and 3+. (D–F) The RGB images were acquired by traditional RGB imaging system. (G–I) The corresponding MS images were acquired by MSI system. (D and G) Positive HER2 membrane staining was scored as 1+. (E and H) Positive HER2 membrane staining was scored as 2+. (F and I) Positive HER2 membrane staining was scored as 3+. Magnification 40× (A, B, and C) or 100× (D, E, F, G, H, and I); scale bar: 100 μm for all images.

Quantification of MS Images and RGB Images of HER2 Expression for 5-DFS Prediction

Among the 240 specimens, the HER2 total signal OD values and the average signal OD values quantified by MS images (i.e., HER2 MS) varied from 0.00 to 2.63 × 105 (median, 1.60 × 104) and from 0.000 to 0.156 (median, 0.013), respectively. Determined by RGB images (i.e., HER2 RGB), the values were from 0.00 to 2.23 × 105 (median, 1.14 × 104) and from 0.000 to 0.138 (median, 0.009) accordingly (Table 2, Table 3). The cutoff value of the total signal OD values in HER2 MS identified by the X-tile software was 4.33 × 104, and based on this, patients were categorized into high–HER2 expression group (n = 71) and low–HER2 expression group (n = 169). The 5-DFS of the former was significant shorter than that of the latter (log-rank test, P < .001; Figure 3A). The cutoff point in HER2 RGB was 3.89 × 104, and patients with high HER2 expression (n = 62) had significantly worse 5-DFS than those with low HER2 expression (n = 178) by determining RGB images (P < .001) (Figure 3B).
Table 2

The Total Signal OD Index of HER2 MS and RGB Images, Cutoff Value, and Classification

ImagesTotal Signal OD Values
Cutoff ValuePatients (n)
MedianRangeHigh-HER2 GroupLow-HER2 Group
HER2 MS1.60 × 1040.00-2.63 × 1054.33 × 10471169
HER2 RGB1.14 × 1040.00-2.23 × 1053.89 × 10462178
Table 3

The Average Signal OD Index of HER2 MS and RGB Images, Cutoff Value, and Classification

ImagesAverage Signal OD Values
Cutoff PointPatients (n)
MedianRangeHigh-HER2 GroupLow-HER2 Group
HER2 MS0.0130.000-0.1560.03173167
HER2 RGB0.0090.000-0.1380.02665175
Figure 3

The relationship between total signal OD index and 5-DFS in BC patients, which was obtained from the analysis of HER2 MS or HER2 RGB images. HER2 MS (A) and HER2 RGB (B) are negatively related with 5-DFS in all patients. HER2 MS (C) and HER2 RGB (D) are inversely related with 5-DFS in LN-positive patients. HER2 MS (E) is negatively related with 5-DFS in LN-negative patients, but HER2 RGB (F) has no statistical significance in LN-negative patients. P value tested by the log-rank test.

Similarly, based on the judgment of X-tile software, the cutoff point of the average signal OD values in HER2 MS was 0.031, and patients were categorized into high-HER2 group (n = 73) and low-HER2 group (n = 167); the cutoff point of HER2 RGB was 0.026, and patients were divided into high-HER2 group (n = 65) and low-HER2 group (n = 175). Patients with high HER2 expression had significantly lower 5-DFS than those with low HER2 expression (P < .001), whether determined by HER2 MS (Figure 4A) or RGB images (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

The relationship between average signal OD index and 5-DFS in BC patients, which was obtained from the analysis of HER2 MS or HER2 RGB images. (A–F) Similar results were further observed. P value tested by the log-rank test.

The Quantification of HER2 MS Images and RGB Images to Predict 5-DFS by LN Status

We next evaluated the prediction of HER2 MS and RGB images in patients coupling with different LN status. As shown in Figure 3, by the determination of total signal OD index, HER2 expression evaluated by HER2 MS images was inversely correlated with 5-DFS in LN-positive patients (P < .001, Figure 3C) and LN-negative patients (P = .007, Figure 3E). For the quantification of HER2 RGB images, HER2 expression was negatively correlated with 5-DFS in LN-positive patients (P < .001, Figure 3D) but not in LN-negative patients (P = .101, Figure 3F). Similar results were also observed in the average signal OD index (Figure 4, C–F). These findings indicated that the quantitation of HER2 MS images might be a more preferable approach in predicting the 5-DFS in BC patients.

Multivariate and Weighted Analysis

To further explore the potential value of HER2 MS images for the predication of BC prognosis, a multivariate analysis was performed. The results demonstrated that, by the analysis of the total signal OD index from HER2 MS images, multivariate analysis could identify four variables—HER2 status (P < .001), LN status (P = .006), histological grade (P < .001), and clinical stage (P = .048)—as independent prognostic factors for 5-DFS. However, only three variables including HER2 status (P = .001), LN status (P = .018), and histological grade (P < .001) could be identified from HER2 RGB images (Table 4). Similar results were also achieved by the determination of the average signal OD index (Table 5).
Table 4

Multivariate analyses of factors associated with 5-DFS by total signal OD index.

FactorsAnalysis from HER2 MS images
Analysis from HER2 RGB images
HR (95% CI)P ValueHR (95% CI)P Value
Tumor size1.131 (0.753-1.698).5521.178 (0.789-1.758).422
LN status2.260 (1.257-3.061).0062.029 (1.129-3.645).018
Hormone receptor status0.760 (0.491-1.174).2160.706 (0.458-1.089).115
HER2 status2.454 (1.636-3.681)< .0012.060 (1.361-3.119).001
Histological grade2.924 (2.000-4.275)< .0012.143 (2.156-4.580)< .001
Clinical stage1.572 (1.005-2.460).0481.451 (0.926-2.275).105

5-DFS, 5-year disease-free survival; HR, HR; CI, confidence interval; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; LN, LN; OD, OD.

Table 5

Multivariate analyses of factors associated with 5-DFS by average signal OD index.

FactorsAnalysis from HER2 MS images
Analysis from HER2 RGB images
HR (95% CI)P ValueHR (95% CI)P Value
Tumor size1.150 (0.769-1.722).4961.202 (0.809-1.786).362
LN status2.086 (1.162-3.743).0142.243 (1.251-4.023).007
Hormone receptor status0.814 (0.520-1.275).3690.811 (0.515-1.277).365
HER2 status2.467 (1.650-3.688)< .0012.401(1.599-3.605)< .001
Histological grade3.017 (2.065-4.408)< .0013.293 (2.259-4.801)< .001
Clinical stage1.585 (1.013-2.480).0441.472 (0.940-2.306).091

5-DFS, 5-year disease-free survival; HR, HR; CI, confidence interval; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; LN, LN; OD, OD.

Additionally, the weighted analysis of the impacts of HER2 expressions quantified from HER2 MS images and RGB images on 5-DFS was carried out. As shown in Table 4, Table 5, the hazard ratios (HRs) of HER2 MS were higher than those of HER2 RGB (HR = 2.454; 95% CI, 1.636-3.681 vs HR = 2.060; 95% CI, 1.361-3.119; HR = 2.467; 95% CI, 1.650-3.688 vs HR = 2.401; 95% CI, 1.599-3.605) by either total signal OD index or average signal OD index.

Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of HER2 MS and HER2 RGB Images

ROC curve analysis was implemented to further evaluate the prognostic performance of these independent factors identified by multivariate analysis. All factors could predict the recurrence risk well (P < .05). In predicting recurrence or not, by the comparison of the total signal OD index, the prognostic value of HER2 MS images (AUC = 0.649; 95% CI, 0.577-0.722; P < .001) was higher than HER2 RGB images (AUC = 0.596; 95% CI, 0.522-0.670; P = .012) and clinical stage (AUC = 0.642; 95% CI, 0.571-0.713; P < .001) but lower than LN status (AUC = 0.696, 95% CI: 0.628-0.763, P < .001) and histological grade (AUC = 0.748, 95% CI: 0.686-0.811, P < .001) (Figure 5A). Analogous results were also revealed in the average signal OD index (Figure 5B).
Figure 5

ROC curve analysis on the prognostic value of HER2 MS and HER2 RGB. (A) By the analysis of total signal OD index, AUC of HER2 MS was greater than HER2 RGB and clinical stage but smaller than LN status and histological grade on recurrence. (B) Similar results were further realized by the determination of average signal OD index.

Evaluation of Prediction Efficiency of HER2 MS and HER2 RGB Images

In addition, the prediction efficiency of HER2 MS and RGB images in prognostication of BC recurrence was also assessed. As shown in Table 6, by the comparison of the total signal OD index, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the prediction of BC prognosis by HER2 MS images were higher than those of HER2 RGB images (48.0% vs 39.0%, 84.2% vs 83.6%, 69.0% vs 62.9%, and 69.8% vs 65.7%, respectively). The higher predictive accuracy on recurrence was thus obtained for HER2 MS images than HER2 RGB images (69.6% vs 65.0%). The same trend was also observed by the determination of the average signal OD index (69.6% vs 64.6%).
Table 6

The prediction efficiency of HER2 MS and HER2 RGB images for BC prognosis.

ItemsAnalysis from total signal OD index
Analysis from average signal OD index
HER2 MS imagesHER2 RGB imagesHER2 MS imagesHER2 RGB images
Sensitivity (%)48.0 (49/100)39.0 (39/100)51.0 (51/100)40.0 (40/100)
Specificity (%)84.2 (118/140)83.6 (117/140)82.9 (116/140)82.1 (115/140)
PPV (%)69.0 (49/71)62.9 (39/62)68.0 (51/75)61.5 (40/65)
NPV (%)69.8 (118/169)65.7 (117/178)70.3 (116/165)65.7 (115/175)
Accuracy (%)69.6 (167/240)65.0 (156/240)69.6 (167/240)64.6 (155/240)

BC, BC; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; OD, OD; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Discussion

In the present study, we have developed a novel approach to quantitatively determine the HER2 expression in IHC images automatically for the better evaluation of the prognosis of BC patients. The quantitation of MS images or conventional RGB images of HER2 IHC was realized by the use of TMAs of large cohorts of BC tissue samples. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time to quantify the HER2 status by MS images and display their closer relationship with the recurrence-free survival in BC patients. Additionally, such quantification by MS images performed better in predicting BC prognosis than that by RGB images. Coupled with our previous research about the behavior of MSI in IHC analysis [15], it showed that MSI has the potential as a standard digital imaging system for both diagnosis and prediction of BC prognosis in clinical pathology. With the development of precision medicine, quantitative pathology with improved imaging technique and image information acquisition and analysis has attracted more and more attention. In the aspect of imaging technique, MSI can obtain color spectrum information at every pixel of a color image rather than specific color information of the three available channels (red, green, and blue) by standard RGB imaging [14], [30]. MSI collects different spectral images (from 420 to 720 nm, covering most chromogens) with accurate spectral content, and a complete image “stack” is assembled in memory where a spectrum is correlated with every pixel. This ability significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of imaging process, providing a promising way for multiple target imaging under both bright-field and fluorescence view [17], [18], [19], [30]. In this study, we employed RGB imaging and MSI system to get HER2 IHC staining images in BC TMAs and compared their behaviors. Similar with the result reported by Boucheron et al. [31], MS images provided better overall image qualities and more useful information than the standard RGB images which were vital for further computer analysis. In the aspect of image information acquisition and analysis, the CRi Nuance MSI system can allow pathologists to precisely separate and quantify multiple spatially colocalized chromogens in multicolor IHC staining by multispectral linear unmixing. It can also realize an accurate segmentation of different tissue morphologies (e.g., tumor versus stroma) and cellular and subcellular compartments [17], [32], [33], [34], [35]. In our previous study, better segmentation accuracy and richer color information have been obtained from unmixing MS images of IHC staining combined MSI with CRi Nuance software [15]. Xu et al. also reported the potential utility of CRi Nuance MSI system in quantifying biomarkers and interpreting the spatial and anatomical distribution of biomarkers of high-order processes [36]. HER2 status, which is closely related to the malignant biologic behaviors of BC, including aggressiveness and metastasis, has been used as a critical indicator for the identification of distinct biological subtypes of BC and prediction of prognosis [9], [37]. Quantum dots–based quantitative spectral analysis of HER2 has helped the establishment of a new molecular classification system of BC and the prediction of tumor prognosis [23]. MSI has been reported to detect some potential prognostic factors [36] and to determine the pericyte coverage of differentiated vessels inside tumor vasculature as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma [38], [39]. Based on this new approach, the present study systematically evaluated the clinical value of the quantitation of HER2 MS images and RGB images coupled with the conventional pathological prognostic factors using 5-DFS as the primary end point. All BC patients were divided into two subgroups with different 5-DFS according to X-title software. The result showed that more patients in the poor-prognosis group were identified by quantifying HER2 MS images than those by quantifying RGB images, which were both inversely correlated with 5-DFS significantly. We further assessed the prognostic value of HER2 MS and RGB images by LN status, the most important indicator for evaluating tumor metastasis. Significant correlation between HER2 RGB and 5-DFS only existed in LN-positive patients, not in LN-negative patients. Nevertheless, HER2 MS exhibited statistical significance in both LN-positive and LN-negative patients (Figures 3 and 4), suggesting the better predictive ability of HER2 MS on recurrence than HER2 RGB. Multivariate analysis indicated that HER2 MS provided higher HR than HER2 RGB in predicting 5-DFS (2.454 vs 2.060; 2.467 vs 2.401). Furthermore, HER2 MS had correlation with three major conventional prognostic factors, including LN status, histological grade, and clinical stage, but HER2 RGB was only correlated with the first two factors (Tables 4 and 5). Additionally, ROC curve analysis showed that HER2 MS had higher prognostic value on recurrence than HER2 RGB (Figure 5, A and B). Compared with HER2 RGB, HER2 MS displayed better performance in sensitivity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for predicting recurrences (Table 6). Thus, the quantification of HER2 MS images could be used as a better approach for prognostic prediction, benefitting from the better predictive ability among BC subgroups, better performance for recurrence prediction, and good correlation with the currently established pathological prognosticators. We acknowledge some limitations to our study. Firstly, the results should be evaluated further in a larger multicenter BC patient population with long-term follow-up. Secondly, only the relationship between HER2 expression and patient outcome by 5-DFS was evaluated in this study. It is better to further study the corresponding relations between HER2 expression and the overall survival because of the nonlinear relation between DFS and overall survival sometimes. Thirdly, although image analysis techniques can reduce interobserver variability, it is impossible to eliminate all subjectivities because the system was trained manually by a pathologist initially. Finally, the limitation that every core of TMAs was not able to completely represent the whole tumor might lead to the possible sample selection bias.

Conclusions

In this study, we developed an approach for the assessment of HER2 status using quantifying MS images and validated the potential of MS images on predicting outcome in patients with invasive BC. Our findings demonstrated that better information on BC prognosis could be obtained from the quantification of HER2 MS images and the application of MS images may be better than conventional RGB images in predicting BC prognosis.

Conflicts of Interest

None.
  36 in total

1.  Cellular context in epigenetics: quantitative multicolor imaging and automated per-cell analysis of miRNAs and their putative targets.

Authors:  James R Mansfield
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 2.  Early breast cancer.

Authors:  John R Benson; Ismail Jatoi; Martin Keisch; Francisco J Esteva; Andreas Makris; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Utility of multispectral imaging in automated quantitative scoring of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Christopher Fiore; Dyane Bailey; Niamh Conlon; Xiaoqiu Wu; Neil Martin; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Stephen Finn; Katja Fall; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andren; Massimo Loda; Richard Flavin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Multispectral imaging and pathology: seeing and doing more.

Authors:  Richard M Levenson; Alessandro Fornari; Massimo Loda
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-09

5.  Cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Lucio Liberato; Monia Marchetti; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Co-evolution of cancer microenvironment reveals distinctive patterns of gastric cancer invasion: laboratory evidence and clinical significance.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Peng; Xiu-Li Liu; Xiong Liu; Yan Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Lymphatic invasion revealed by multispectral imaging is common in primary melanomas and associates with prognosis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Xu; Phyllis A Gimotty; Dupont Guerry; Giorgos Karakousis; Patricia Van Belle; Haohai Liang; Katharine Montone; Terry Pasha; Michael E Ming; Geza Acs; Michael Feldman; Stephen Barth; Rachel Hammond; Rosalie Elenitsas; Paul J Zhang; David E Elder
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  High expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in peritumoral liver tissue is associated with poor survival after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Zhu; Ju-Bo Zhang; Peng-Yuan Zhuang; Hong-Guang Zhu; Wei Zhang; Yu-Quan Xiong; Wei-Zhong Wu; Lu Wang; Zhao-You Tang; Hui-Chuan Sun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A colorful future of quantitative pathology: validation of Vectra technology using chromogenic multiplexed immunohistochemistry and prostate tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Kenneth Hennrick; Sally Drew
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cancer detection from stained biopsies using high-speed spectral imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Brozgol; Pramod Kumar; Daniela Necula; Irena Bronshtein-Berger; Moshe Lindner; Shlomi Medalion; Lee Twito; Yotam Shapira; Helena Gondra; Iris Barshack; Yuval Garini
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Multispectral analysis tools can increase utility of RGB color images in histology.

Authors:  Farzad Fereidouni; Croix Griffin; Austin Todd; Richard Levenson
Journal:  J Opt       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.516

3.  Using spectral imaging for the analysis of abnormalities for colorectal cancer: When is it helpful?

Authors:  Ruqayya Awan; Somaya Al-Maadeed; Rafif Al-Saady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Vaginitis Classification Method Based on Multi-Spectral Image Feature Fusion.

Authors:  Kongya Zhao; Peng Gao; Sunxiangyu Liu; Ying Wang; Guitao Li; Youzheng Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.