Literature DB >> 2783503

CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement.

D M Paushter1, R K Zeman, M L Scheibler, P L Choyke, M H Jaffe, L R Clark.   

Abstract

Although IV injection of contrast material is widely used for detection and follow-up of hepatic metastases on CT, the optimal method of contrast enhancement has not yet been defined. A prospective study was performed in 50 consecutive patients with suspected hepatic metastases. Lesion size and detectability were compared on unenhanced CT scans, scans obtained during a bolus injection of contrast material (early bolus phase), and scans obtained during a rapid infusion after the loading bolus. A total of 60 hepatic lesions were evaluated in 26 patients, 19 with histologic confirmation of metastases and seven with strong supportive evidence. The bolus phase allowed detection of 15% more lesions than did examination during the rapid-infusion phase. Lesion size varied, depending on the timing and method of contrast administration; the largest measurements were obtained during bolus injection of contrast material. In addition, bolus administration of contrast material subjectively resulted in the best lesion detection. Because the three techniques of IV contrast enhancement may produce different size measurements, sequential examinations must be tailored appropriately. Scanning during the bolus phase is technically possible with current CT equipment and is recommended as the primary CT screening examination for hepatic metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783503     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.2.267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  3 in total

1.  Graphics Processing Unit-Accelerated Nonrigid Registration of MR Images to CT Images During CT-Guided Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablations.

Authors:  Junichi Tokuda; William Plishker; Meysam Torabi; Olutayo I Olubiyi; George Zaki; Servet Tatli; Stuart G Silverman; Raj Shekher; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Comparison of iohexol-240 versus iohexol-300 in abdominal CT.

Authors:  A A Singer; J R Tagliabue; D M Paushter; G P Borkowski; D M Einstein
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

3.  Rapid Quality Assessment of Nonrigid Image Registration Based on Supervised Learning.

Authors:  Eung-Joo Lee; William Plishker; Nobuhiko Hata; Paul B Shyn; Stuart G Silverman; Shuvra S Bhattacharyya; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.