Literature DB >> 27834725

Do Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Affect 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in the Dentate Nucleus and the Globus Pallidus? A Pilot Study.

Kyle Bauer1, Alaina Lathrum1, Osama Raslan2, Patrick V Kelly3, Yihua Zhou4, Debra Hewing1, Crystal Botkin1, James A Turner1, Medhat Osman5.   

Abstract

Gadolinium is toxic and to avoid its deposition in tissues, it must be chemically bonded with nonmetal ions to facilitate its excretion by the kidneys. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus (DN) and globus pallidus (GP) on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images has been both morphologically and pathologically linked to gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) retention in the brain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether repeated administrations of GBCA would affect the uptake of 18F-FDG in the DN and GP on PET/CT.
Methods: Three hundred seventy-six patients who underwent both contrast-enhanced MR (CE MR) of the brain and PET/CT from January 2004 to October 2015 were identified. Patients with a history of brain irradiation or hepatic or renal disease were excluded. The SUVmax was measured in the DN and GP on the PET/CT scan in patients who had 3-6 successive CE MR brain studies. The SUVmax of the corresponding areas in the control group of patients who had not undergone previous CE MR and who had a normal, unenhanced MR finding of the brain was also measured. A Wilcoxon 2-sample test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Fifteen of 376 (4%) patients (mean age ± SD, 54 ± 18 y; 10 men and 5 women) were included in the subject group, and 15 patients (mean age ± SD, 36 ± 9 y; 11 men and 4 women) were included in the control group. The median DN SUVmax was significantly lower in the subject group than in the control group (5.4 vs. 6.4, respectively; P = 0.021). Similarly, the median GP SUVmax was significantly lower in the subject group than in the control group (8.8 vs. 12.1, respectively; P = 0.003).
Conclusion: The median SUVmax in the DN and GP was 16% and 27% lower, respectively, in patients who received GBCAs than in those who had not received GBCAs, possibly related to gadolinium deposition in these areas.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dentate nucleus; gadolinium; globus pallidus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27834725     DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.180844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  6 in total

1.  Absence of clinical cerebellar syndrome after serial injections of more than 20 doses of gadoterate, a macrocyclic GBCA: a monocenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Gaetano Perrotta; Thierry Metens; Julie Absil; Marc Lemort; Mario Manto
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Gadolinium Deposition and Liver MRI.

Authors:  Robert M Marks; Ryan M Ash; James T Lee
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

3.  The Effects of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents on the Cerebellum: from Basic Research to Neurological Practice and from Pregnancy to Adulthood.

Authors:  Winda Ariyani; Miski Aghnia Khairinisa; Gaetano Perrotta; Mario Manto; Noriyuki Koibuchi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Gadolinium-based Contrast Media, Cerebrospinal Fluid and the Glymphatic System: Possible Mechanisms for the Deposition of Gadolinium in the Brain.

Authors:  Toshiaki Taoka; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 5.  Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: Current Updates.

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Won-Jin Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Gadolinium Retention after Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narratative Review.

Authors:  Afnan Fahd Al-Muhanna
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.