Literature DB >> 27834225

Improving the assessment of occupational diseases by occupational physicians.

J S Boschman1, T Brand2, M H W Frings-Dresen3, H F van der Molen3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevention of occupational diseases is limited by a lack of insight into occupational exposure to risk. We developed a six-step approach to improve the diagnosis and reporting of occupational diseases and the selection of subsequent preventive actions by occupational physicians (OPs). AIMS: To evaluate the effect of the six-step approach on the transparency and quality of assessing occupational diseases and the usability of the six-step approach according to OPs and their satisfaction with it.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial. OPs in the control group used the standard information available. OPs in the intervention group used the six-step approach and accompanying educational materials. The actions and decisions of OPs in both groups were analysed using 17 performance indicators. To address the second issue, OPs used the six-step approach over 6 weeks and rated its usability and their satisfaction in relation to several aspects.
RESULTS: The average score of the OPs in the intervention group (n = 110) was statistically significantly higher (11/17 performance indicators, 62% of the maximum score) than that of the OPs in the control group (n = 120, 5/17 performance indicators, 30% of the maximum score, P < 0.001). The usability aspects of the six-step approach had mean scores of 7 and 8. Mean satisfaction with the six-step approach was 8.
CONCLUSIONS: The six-step approach resulted in better evidence-based and transparent decision-making about occupational diseases by OPs. Usability and satisfaction were rated as satisfactory by the OPs.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; occupational diseases; randomized controlled trial.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27834225     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqw149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  9 in total

1.  Work-relatedness of lumbosacral radiculopathy syndrome: Review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Paul F M Kuijer; Jos H Verbeek; Andreas Seidler; Rolf Ellegast; Carel T J Hulshof; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Henk F Van der Molen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Development of an e-learning prototype for assessing occupational stress-related disorders: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lieke Omvlee; Henk F van der Molen; Ellen Te Pas; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Work Disabling Nerve Injury at Both Elbows Due to Laptop Use at Flexible Workplaces inside an Office: Case-Report of a Bilateral Ulnar Neuropathy.

Authors:  P Paul F M Kuijer; Joris van der Pas; Henk F van der Molen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Work-relatedness of inguinal hernia: a systematic review including meta-analysis and GRADE.

Authors:  P P F M Kuijer; D Hondebrink; C T J Hulshof; H F Van der Molen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Analysis of Dental Professionals' and Dental Students' Care for their Skin.

Authors:  Iva Japundžić; Dario Novak; Matea Kuna; Gaby Novak-Bilić; Liborija Lugović-Mihić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2018-03

6.  A Comparative Study on the Prediction of Occupational Diseases in China with Hybrid Algorithm Combing Models.

Authors:  Yaoqin Lu; Huan Yan; Lijiang Zhang; Jiwen Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  How to improve the assessment of the impact of occupational diseases at a national level? The Netherlands as an example.

Authors:  Henk F van der Molen; Carel Tj Hulshof; P Paul Fm Kuijer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Criteria for diagnosis and attribution of an occupational musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Violante
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 1.275

9.  Occupational COVID-19: what can be learned from notifications of occupational diseases?

Authors:  Henk F van der Molen; Sanja Kezic; Steven Visser; Gerda de Groene; Jaap Maas; Astrid de Wind; Sietske Tamminga
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.402

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.