Literature DB >> 27834012

Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Comparison to the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator and the Tokyo Guidelines.

Roxanne L Massoumi1, Colleen M Trevino2, Travis P Webb2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared observed postoperative outcomes from laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis (AC) to outcomes predicted by the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator.We also noted and compared any differences in observed outcomes across the different Tokyo Guidelines (TG) levels of AC severity.We hypothesized that ACS-NSQIP would accurately predict complications and length of stay (LOS) and that increased TG severity levels would correlate with more complications, increased conversion to open surgery, and longer LOS.
METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis over eighteen months was performed.
RESULTS: ACS-NSQIP predicted a complication rate of 4.6% (11% found) and LOS of 0.73 days (2.5 found), p < 0.05. Increased TG severity had LOS of 1.89, 2.75, and 5.33, respectively, p < 0.05. The complication numbers and conversion to open cholecystectomy were insignificant between the TG classes.
CONCLUSION: ACS-NSQIP did not accurately predict complications or LOS. TG classifications did not show a significant difference in complications or conversion to open surgery, but positively correlated with LOS. ACS-NSQIP may not accurately predict patient outcomes and the TG, originally created with the purpose of differentiating levels of inflammation and severity, may only be useful for predicting LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27834012     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3816-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in geriatric patients.

Authors:  G Decker; M Goergen; P Philippart; P Mendes da Costa
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.090

2.  Predicting length of stay and conversion to open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis using the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines in a US population.

Authors:  G Paul Wright; Kellen Stilwell; Jared Johnson; Matthew T Hefty; Mathew H Chung
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 7.027

3.  Different setups of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion and complication rates: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hasan Kais; Yehuda Hershkovitz; Yassir Abu-Snina; Bar Chikman; Ariel Halevy
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Tadahiro Takada; Steven M Strasberg; Henry A Pitt; Dirk J Gouma; O James Garden; Markus W Büchler; Harumi Gomi; Christos Dervenis; John A Windsor; Sun-Whe Kim; Eduardo de Santibanes; Robert Padbury; Xiao-Ping Chen; Angus C W Chan; Sheung-Tat Fan; Palepu Jagannath; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takao Itoi; Avinash N Supe
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.027

5.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adam I Edelstein; Mary J Kwasny; Linda I Suleiman; Rishi H Khakhkhar; Michael A Moore; Matthew D Beal; David W Manning
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Acute acalculous cholecystitis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Laurila; H Syrjälä; P A Laurila; J Saarnio; T I Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Prognostic parameters for the prediction of acute gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  Cagatay Aydin; Gülüm Altaca; Ibrahim Berber; Koray Tekin; Melih Kara; Izzet Titiz
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefan Sauerland; Anna Maria Minicozzi; Giuseppe Verlato; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Cordiano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Emergent versus elective cholecystectomy: conversion rates and outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen B To; Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec; Michael J Englesbe; Michael N Terjimanian; Cai Shijie; Darrell A Campbell; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.150

View more
  8 in total

1.  Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases.

Authors:  Justin Gerard; Minh B Luu; Jennifer Poirier; Daniel J Deziel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Predicting Post-operative Complications in Crohn's Disease: an Appraisal of Clinical Scoring Systems and the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Kenneth D Allen; Anita Afzali; Syed Husain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Forecasting outcomes after cholecystectomy in octogenarian patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio D'Acapito; Alessandro Cucchetti; Daniela Di Pietrantonio; Francesca Tauceri; Maria Teresa Mirarchi; Massimo Framarini; Raffaele Bova; Francesca Fappiano; Giorgio Ercolani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Utilization of an Intraoperative Grading Scale in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Nepalese Perspective.

Authors:  Suman Baral; Raj Kumar Chhetri; Neeraj Thapa
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  A Simple Risk Score to Predict Clavien-Dindo Grade IV and V Complications After Non-elective Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Burke; Rishi Rattan; Shaina Sedighim; Minjae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator.

Authors:  Peter S Vosler; Mario Orsini; Danny J Enepekides; Kevin M Higgins
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

7.  Beyond 30 Days: A Risk Calculator for Longer Term Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan T Blough; Michael M Vu; Cecil S Qiu; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-12

8.  Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study.

Authors:  Kristin M Corey; Sehj Kashyap; Elizabeth Lorenzi; Sandhya A Lagoo-Deenadayalan; Katherine Heller; Krista Whalen; Suresh Balu; Mitchell T Heflin; Shelley R McDonald; Madhav Swaminathan; Mark Sendak
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.069

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.