| Literature DB >> 27833655 |
Aijuan Zhou1, Jiaguang Zhang2, Kaili Wen3, Zhihong Liu3, Guoying Wang3, Wenzong Liu4, Aijie Wang5, Xiuping Yue3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production from waste activated sludge (WAS) digestion is constrained by unbalanced nutrient composition (low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio). Characteristics conditioning by extra carbon sources, normally in the mixture of raw solid, has been reported to be an efficient approach to enhance WAS acidification. However, little attention has been paid to the contributions of other adjustment forms. Moreover, the corresponding ecological estimation has not been investigated yet.Entities:
Keywords: Adjustment form; Anaerobic digestion; Corn straw (CS); Ecological estimation; Volatile fatty acids (VFAs); Waste activated sludge (WAS)
Year: 2016 PMID: 27833655 PMCID: PMC5103463 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0659-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Effect of CS adjustment form on VFAs production (a 50:50%; b 65:35%) and composition (c) from WAS co-digestion (Note: error bars represent standard deviation)
Fig. 2Effect of CS adjustment form on methane production from WAS (a 50:50%; b 65:35%) and the variation of pH values during WAS and CS co-digestion (a 50:50%; b 65:35%) (Note: error bars represent standard deviation; Panels in c and d represent the optimum pH range for methanogens)
Fig. 3OTU networks of the bacterial communities (a). Overlaps of the bacterial communities based on OTU (3% distance). The shared OTUs were analyzed at phylum level (b). Relative abundance was defined as the number of sequences per sample. Taxonomic classification of pyrosequences from the four WAS bacterial communities at the phylum (c), class (d) and genus (e) levels
Fig. 4Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) between enriched genera and environmental variables [VFAs, acetic acid (HAc), propionic acid (HPr), methane, pH, soluble proteins (Spr) and carbohydrates (Sca)]
Comparison of VFAs yield from WAS fermentation by co-digesting carbon-rich substrates
| Sludge | Carbon-rich substrates (adjustment forms) | Feedstock proportions | VFAs yield | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusting pH (8)-treated WAS | Thermal-treated rice (TTR) | 50:50% (VSSWAS:VSSTTR) | 520 mg COD/g VSS | [ |
| WAS | Perennial ryegrass (Solid) | 20:1 (C/N) | 369 mg COD/g TS | [ |
| Mixed sludge (MS) | Lime-treated bagasse (LTB) (Solid) | 30:70%, 40:60% and 60:40% (gMS:gLTB) | 360 mg carboxylic acid/g VS | [ |
| Alkaline- thermal treated WAS |
| 45:55% (VSSWAS:VSSABS) | 514 mg COD/g VSSWAS+ABS | [ |
| WAS | Sugar beet pulp lixiviation (SBPL) (Solid) | 75:25% (vSS:vSBPL) | 350 mg COD/g VSS | [ |
| Dewatered WAS | Food waste (FW) (Solid) | 12:88% (VSSWAS:VSSFW) | 393 mg/g VSS | [ |
| Ultrasonic treated WAS | Alkaline treated CS hydrolysate | 65:35% (VSSWAS:VSSCS) | 583 mg COD/g VSS | This study |
Fig. 5Schematic diagram of traditional treatment methods (a) and an enhanced concept applied in a WWTP with the WAS digestion conditioning with different CS adjustment forms (b)