| Literature DB >> 27833631 |
Ana Lourenço1, Jorge Rencoret2, Catarina Chemetova1, Jorge Gominho1, Ana Gutiérrez2, José C Del Río2, Helena Pereira1.
Abstract
The composition and structure of lignin in different tissues-phellem (cork), phloem and xylem (wood)-of Quercus suber was studied. Whole cell walls and their respective isolated milled lignins were analyzed by pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2D-NMR) and derivatization followed by reductive cleavage (DFRC). Different tissues presented varied p-hydroxyphenyl:guaiacyl:syringyl (H:G:S) lignin compositions. Whereas lignin from cork has a G-rich lignin (H:G:S molar ratio 2:85:13), lignin from phloem presents more S-units (H:G:S molar ratio of 1:58:41) and lignin from xylem is slightly enriched in S-lignin (H:G:S molar ratio 1:45:55). These differences were reflected in the relative abundances of the different interunit linkages. Alkyl-aryl ethers (β-O-4') were predominant, increasing from 68% in cork, to 71% in phloem and 77% in xylem, as consequence of the enrichment in S-lignin units. Cork lignin was enriched in condensed structures such as phenylcoumarans (β-5', 20%), dibenzodioxocins (5-5', 5%), as corresponds to a lignin enriched in G-units. In comparison, lignin from phloem and xylem presented lower levels of condensed linkages. The lignin from cork was highly acetylated at the γ-OH of the side-chain (48% lignin acetylation), predominantly over G-units; while the lignins from phloem and xylem were barely acetylated and this occurred mainly over S-units. These results are a first time overview of the lignin structure in xylem, phloem (generated by cambium), and in cork (generated by phellogen), in agreement with literature that reports that lignin biosynthesis is flexible and cell specific.Entities:
Keywords: DFRC; NMR; Py-GC/MS; Quercus suber; cork; milled lignin; phloem; xylem
Year: 2016 PMID: 27833631 PMCID: PMC5081372 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Cross-sectional image of a . scl, clusters of sclereids; f, fibers; v, vessel; r, rays; p, parenchyma.
Chemical composition of the 40–60 mesh from cork, phloem and xylem of .
| Ash | 0.7 | 3.1 | 1.5 |
| Total extractives | 10.4 | 6.2 | 8.4 |
| Dichloromethane | 4.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Ethanol | 2.9 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| Water | 3.4 | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Total lignin | 27.1 | 38.4 | 23.6 |
| Klason lignin | 26.2 | 36.0 | 20.6 |
| Soluble lignin | 0.9 | 2.4 | 3.0 |
| Suberin | 30.1 | – | – |
| Arabinose | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| Xylose | 6.4 | 15.5 | 13.7 |
| Mannose | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Galactose | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Glucose | 9.0 | 16.5 | 28.7 |
Figure 2Py-GC/MS chromatograms of the milled lignin preparations isolated from the different parts of . The identities and relative abundances of the released lignin-derived compounds are listed in Table 2.
Identities and relative molar abundances (% of identified products) of the lignin-derived compounds from pyrolysis of milled lignins of cork, phloem and xylem of .
| 1 | guaiacol | G | 21.3 | 13.1 | 7.3 |
| 2 | 4-methylguaiacol | G | 26.7 | 15.8 | 10.0 |
| 3 | 4-ethylguaiacol | G | 9.7 | 5.6 | 2.8 |
| 4 | 4-vinylguaiacol | G | 14.1 | 11.6 | 4.5 |
| 5 | eugenol | G | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 6 | 4-propylguiacol | G | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 7 | syringol | S | 3.1 | 12.3 | 14.0 |
| 8 | G | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | |
| 9 | G | 7.2 | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| 10 | 4-methylsyringol | S | 2.9 | 8.9 | 15.9 |
| 11 | vanillin | G | 3.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| 12 | 4-ethylsyringol | S | 1.3 | 2.2 | 4.4 |
| 13 | acetovanillone | G | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| 14 | 4-vinylsyringol | S | 1.1 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
| 15 | 4-propylsyringol | S | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.9 |
| 16 | guaiacylacetone | G | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| 17 | 4-allylsyringol | S | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| 18 | S | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | |
| 19 | S | 0.6 | 3.7 | 5.8 | |
| 20 | syringaldehyde | S | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.9 |
| 21 | homosyringaldehyde | S | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 22 | acetosyringone | S | 0.0 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
| 23 | syringylacetone | S | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| 24 | propiosyringone | S | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 25 | S | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 | |
| S/G molar ratio | 0.10 | 0.62 | 1.66 | ||
G, Guaiacyl derived units; S, Syringyl derived units. Mean values of two samples.
Figure 3Side-chain (δ. The signal assignments are presented in Table 3 and the main lignin structures identified are depicted in Figure 5.
Figure 4Side-chain (δ. The signal assignments are presented in Table 3 and the main lignin structures identified are depicted in Figure 5.
Assignments of the lignin .
| Bβ | 53.1/3.43 | Cβ–Hβ in phenylcoumaran substructures ( |
| Cβ | 53.5/3.05 | Cβ–Hβ in β–β′ resinol substructures ( |
| −OCH3 | 55.6/3.73 | C−H in methoxyls |
| Aγ | 59.4/3.40 and 3.72 | Cγ–Hγ in β– |
| Dβ | 59.5/2.75 | Cβ–Hβ in in 5-5′ (dibenzodioxocin) substructures ( |
| Iγ | 61.3/4.08 | Cγ–Hγ in cinnamyl alcohol end-groups ( |
| Bγ | 62.6/3.67 | Cγ–Hγ in phenylcoumaran substructures ( |
| A′γ | 63.5/3.83 and 4.30 | Cγ–Hγ in γ-acylated β– |
| I′γ | 64.3/4.63 | Cγ–Hγ in γ-acetylated cinnamyl alcohol end-groups ( |
| Cγ | 71.0/3.83 and 4.19 | Cγ–Hγ in β–β′ resinol substructures ( |
| Aα(G) | 71.0/4.73 | Cα–Hα in β– |
| Aα(S) | 71.7/4.83 | Cα–Hα in β– |
| Fβ′ | 79.4/4.10 | Cβ′–Hβ′ in spirodienone substructures ( |
| A′β(G) | 80.7/4.51 | Cβ–Hβ in γ-acetylated β– |
| Fα | 81.2/5.01 | Cα–Hα in spirodienone substructures ( |
| Dα | 83.0/4.82 | Cα-Hα in 5-5′ (dibenzodioxocin) substructures ( |
| Fα′ | 83.6/4.68 | Cα′–Hα′ in spirodienone substructures ( |
| Aβ(G) | 83.7/4.26 | Cβ–Hβ in β– |
| Cα | 84.7/4.64 | Cα–Hα in β–β′ resinol substructures ( |
| Dβ | 85.2/3.85 | Cβ-Hβ in 5-5′ (dibenzodioxocin) substructures ( |
| Aβ(S) | 85.8/4.09 | Cβ–Hβ in β– |
| Bα | 86.8/5.43 | Cα–Hα in phenylcoumaran substructures ( |
| S2,6 | 103.7/6.68 | C2–H2 and C6–H6 in etherified syringyl units ( |
| J2,6(S) | 106.2/7.02 | C2-H2 and C6-H6 in sinapaldehyde end-groups ( |
| S′2,6 | 106.3/7.32 and 7.20 | C2-H2 and C6-H6 in Cα-oxidized syringyl units ( |
| G2 | 110.8/6.96 | C2–H2 in guaiacyl units ( |
| FA2 | 111.1/7.25 | C2-H2 in ferulates ( |
| J2(G) | 112.5/7.30 | C2–H2 in conyferaldehyde end-groups ( |
| F2′(S) | 113.5/6.25 | C2′–H2′ in spirodienone substructures ( |
| FAβ | 113.5/6.27 | Cβ–Hβ in ferulates ( |
| G5/G6 | 115.0/6.74 | C5–H5 and C6–H6 in guaiacyl units ( |
| G6 | 118.7/6.77 | C5–H5 inguaiacyl units ( |
| J6(G) | 118.8/7.30 | C6–H6 in conyferaldehyde end-groups ( |
| F6′(S) | 118.9/6.06 | C6′–H6′ in spirodienone substructures ( |
| FA6 | 123.3/7.10 | C6–H6 in ferulate ( |
| Jβ | 126.3/6.76 | Cβ–Hβ in cinnamyl aldehyde end-groups ( |
| H2,6 | 128.0/7.23 | C2,6–H2,6 in |
| FAα | 144.4/7.41 | Cα–Hα in ferulates ( |
| Jα | 153.4/7.61 | Cα–Hα in cinnamyl aldehyde end-groups ( |
Figure 5Main structures present in the lignins from .
Structural characteristics (lignin inter-unit linkages, end-groups, γ-acylation, aromatic units and S/G ratio, and ferulate content) from Integration of .
| β– | − | 68 | − | 71 | − | 77 |
| α-oxidized β– | − | 0 | − | 2 | − | 2 |
| Phenylcoumarans ( | − | 20 | − | 13 | − | 9 |
| Resinols ( | − | 4 | − | 7 | − | 8 |
| Dibenzodioxocins ( | − | 5 | − | 2 | − | 1 |
| Open β-1 ( | − | 0 | − | 2 | − | 1 |
| Spirodienones ( | − | 3 | − | 3 | − | 2 |
| Cinnamyl alcohol end-groups ( | − | 8 | − | 2 | − | 1 |
| γ-acylated cinnamyl alcohol end-groups ( | − | 5 | − | 0 | − | 0 |
| Cinnamaldehyde end-groups ( | − | 11 | − | 7 | − | 4 |
| Lignin side-chain γ-acylation (%) | − | 48 | − | 0 | − | 0 |
| H (%) | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| G (%) | 84 | 85 | 59 | 58 | 39 | 45 |
| S (%) | 8 | 13 | 40 | 41 | 61 | 55 |
| S/G ratio | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Ferulates (%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Expressed as a fraction of the total lignin inter-unit linkage types A–F.
Molar percentages (H + G + S = 100).
Ferulate molar content as percentages of total lignin content (H + G + S).
Content of H-units are overestimated due to the occurrence of signals from proteins.
Figure 6Chromatograms of the DFRC′ degradation products from the milled lignin preparations isolated from the different parts of . cG, tG, cS, and tS are the normal cis- and trans-coniferyl (guaiacyl) and sinapyl (syringyl) alcohol monomers (as their dipropionylated derivatives). cGac, tGac, cSac and tSac are the natively γ-acetylated cis- and trans-coniferyl (guaiacyl) and sinapyl (syringyl) alcohol monomers (as their phenol propionylated derivatives).