Literature DB >> 27833624

Assessment of Stress Tolerance, Productivity, and Forage Quality in T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 from Zygophyllum xanthoxylum.

Peng Kang1, Ai-Ke Bao1, Tanweer Kumar1, Ya-Qing Pan1, Zhulatai Bao1, Fei Wang1, Suo-Min Wang1.   

Abstract

Salinization, desertification, and soil nutrient deprivation are threatening the production of alfalfa (pan> class="Species">Medicago sativa L.) in northern China. We have previously generated T0 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressing Zygophyllum xanthoxylum ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 genes with enhanced salt and drought tolerance. To further develop this excellent breeding material into the new forage cultivar, stress tolerance, productivity, and forage quality of T1 transgenic alfalfa (GM) were assessed in this study. The GM inherited the traits of salt and drought tolerance from T0 generation. Most importantly, co-overexpression of ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 enhanced the tolerance to Pi deficiency in GM, which was associated with more Pi accumulation in plants. Meanwhile, T1 transgenic alfalfa developed a larger root system with increased root size, root dry weight and root/shoot ratio, which may be one important reason for the improvement of phosphorus nutrition and high biomass accumulation in GM under various conditions. GM also accumulated more crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, and crude ash than wild-type (WT) plants, especially under stress conditions and in the field. More interestingly, the crude fat contents sharply dropped in WT (by 66-74%), whereas showed no change or decreased less in GM, when subjected to salinity, drought or low-Pi. Our results indicate that T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 shows stronger stress tolerance, higher productivity and better forage quality. This study provides a solid foundation for creating the alfalfa cultivars with high yield, good quality and wide adaptability on saline, dry, and nutrient-deprived marginal lands of northern China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  field trial; nutritive value; phosphorus deficiency; stress resistance; transgenic alfalfa

Year:  2016        PMID: 27833624      PMCID: PMC5081344          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Salinity, drought, and soil nutrient deprivation, which cause land degradation (Mbarki et al., 2016), are primary limiting factors in plant growth and agricultural productivities. In recent years, due to global climate change and excessive human activities, the soil salinpan>ization, desertification, anpan>d soil erosion have showed anpan> inpan>tensifyinpan>g trend inpan> northernpan> Chinpan>a. This situation is resultinpan>g inpan> a dramatic inpan>crease of pan> class="Chemical">saline, arid and nutrient-deprived marginal lands in this region. For maintaining the security of ecological system and agriculture in northern China, reclamation and restoration of marginal lands have been one of most urgent issues at present. Alfalfa (pan> class="Species">Medicago sativa L.) is a perennial legume forage throughout the world. High biomass production, high nutritional quality and widespread adaptability have made alfalfa as a leading forage crop with a good fame of ‘Queen of the Forages’ (Bao et al., 2009; Kumar, 2011). As an economically important legume forage crop, alfalfa has brought considerable profits for local people and companies in northern China. However, the limited arable land resources are the major barrier for further development of alfalfa production in these areas (Bao et al., 2016). This challenge would be readily overcome if a large number of marginal lands were used for alfalfa planting. Paradoxically, most of the existing alfalfa cultivars are difficult to be planted and grow on saline and arid marginal lands, because of weak tolerance to salinity and drought (Maas and Hoffman, 1977; Peel et al., 2004; Kumar, 2011; Bao et al., 2016). In addition to salt and drought stress, inorganic phosphate (Pi) deficiency in soil is another limiting factor that affects the yield and persistence of alfalfa (Berg et al., 2009). Previous studies showed that soil Pi deficiency are common in areas (including northern China) growing alfalfa and other legume crops (Wang et al., 1998; MacDonald et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2012; Bargaz et al., 2016). In the past decades, farmers have to counter this problem through the application of phosphate fertilizer (Kochian et al., 2004; Gaxiola et al., 2011, 2012); however, this process resulted in the increase of cost and damage of environment (Giaveno et al., 2010; Gaxiola et al., 2011, 2012; Pei et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014; Lv et al., 2015). Therefore, developing alfalfa cultivars suitable for growing on saline, arid and nutrient-deprived marginal lands is necessary to promote alfalfa production and provide substantial environmental benefits in northern China. Previous studies have demonstrated that tonoplast Cation/H+ antiporters (NHXs) and H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) play importanpan>t roles inpan> a series of physiological anpan>d biochemical processes inpan>cludinpan>g vacuolar compartmentation of Na+, inpan>tracellular ions anpan>d pH homeostasis, pan> class="Disease">stomatal movements, water uptake, plant development, nutrient use efficiency, and transport of photosynthates (e.g., Bassil et al., 2011; Ferjani et al., 2011, 2012; Gaxiola et al., 2012; Andrés et al., 2014; Bassil and Blumwald, 2014; Reguera et al., 2014; Pizzio et al., 2015; Khadilkar et al., 2016). Overexpression of NHXs or H+-PPase genes significantly improved growth performance and the tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in various transgenic plants (e.g., Apse et al., 1999; Gaxiola et al., 2001; Zhang and Blumwald, 2001; Park et al., 2005; Schilling et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2014). Of significance, co-overexpression of both NHXs and H+-PPase conferred transgenic plants greater tolerance and higher biomass accumulation than expression of the single gene (Zhao et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2010; Bhaskaran and Savithramma, 2011; Gouiaa et al., 2012; Bao et al., 2014). These findings indicated that tonoplast NHXs and H+-PPase genes have the potential in the development of crop cultivars with stronger stress tolerance, higher yield and better quality. In previous study, we co-overexpressed two xerophyte genes, ZxNHX anpan>d ZxVP1-1 from pan> class="Species">Zygophyllum xanthoxylum, encoding vacuolar membrane NHX and H+-PPase, respectively, in alfalfa. The T0 transgenic plants co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 show improved growth performance and enhanced tolerance to salinity and drought (Bao et al., 2016). However, previous work only tested the salt and drought tolerance in T0 generation. To develop this excellent breeding material into a new forage cultivar, it is necessary to investigate if transgenic progeny could stably inherit excellent traits from T0 generation. Therefore, in the present study, we performed a comprehensive evaluation on T1 generation transgenic alfalfa through investigating its stress tolerance, productivity and forage quality in the greenhouse and under field conditions. The T1 transgenic alfalfa inherited the excellent traits from T0 generation and exhibited stronger stress tolerance (to salinity, drought and phosphate deficiency), higher biomass accumulation and forage quality, compared to wild-type (WT) plants.

Materials and Methods

Characterization of T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Plants

The seeds harvested from T0 transgenic alfalfa L9 linpan>e (Bao et al., 2016) were germinpan>ated inpan> 1/2 MS medium containpan>inpan>g 50 mg/l pan> class="Chemical">hygromycin for 2 weeks, then six of surviving plants were randomly chosen for molecular characterization. The PCR analysis was conducted using genomic DNA isolated from leaf of putative T1 transgenic plants and WT plants according to the method as described by Bao et al. (2014). To perform further molecular and physiological assays, the first PCR positive plant and WT were propagated from stem cuttings as described by Bao et al. (2014, 2016). Then total RNA was extracted from root, stem and leaf of propagated transgenic plants (GM) anpan>d WT with a pan> class="Chemical">Trizol Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) following manufacturer’s instructions. The primers, procedures, and conditions of PCR and RT-PCR analyses for ZxVP1-1 and ZxNHX genes were the same as previous report (Bao et al., 2016).

Salt, Drought, and Phosphate (Pi) Deficiency Experiments in the Greenhouse

For salt treatment experiment, the uniform planpan>ts of pan> class="Chemical">GM and WT were transplanted into separate plastic cylindrical pots (8 cm diameter × 10 cm high with a five-mm-diameter small hole at the bottom, one plant per pot) containing vermiculite and perlite (1:1) under a photoperiod of 16/8 h (light/dark, the light density during the light period was 800 mmol/m2/s) at 26 ± 2°C and 60 ± 5% of relative humidity (RH). The pots were placed in the plastic rectangular trays (40 cm × 50 cm, 20 pots per tray). Two liters of 1/2 strength Hoagland nutrient solution was poured into each tray and changed (with fresh nutrient solution) every 2 days to culture the plants for 4 weeks, then NaCl was added into the nutrient solution and increased with 50 mM/day to 200 mM. After salt treatment for 20 days, the plants were harvested for further assessment. The plants from same scheme but without irrigation of NaCl solution were used as control. For drought treatment experiment, T1 transgenic plants and WT were transplanted into plastic cylindrical pots (the same as which in salt treatment, one planpan>t per pot) filled with 300 g oven-dried artificial soil with a mixture of vermiculite, perlite, anpan>d peat moss (v/v, 1:1:1), anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">watered with 1/8 strength Hoagland nutrient solution. The soil water content was controlled at 70% of field water capacity (FWC, the absolute soil water content at FWC is 2.5 g/g) by weighing every day for 4 weeks. After that, the plants from GM and WT were divided into two groups, respectively: control and drought treatment. The soil water content was maintained at 70% of FWC in the control group, while it was reduced to 30% of FWC in the drought group. After 20 days of drought treatment, plants were harvested for further analysis. The growth conditions during the experimental period were the same as that in salt treatment experiment. For Pi deficiency treatment (low-Pi) experiment, the pan> class="Chemical">GM and WT plants were transplanted into separate plastic cylindrical pots (the same as which in salt treatment, one plant per pot) containing perlite (the main constituent is the quartz and doesn’t contain Pi). The pots were placed in plastic rectangular trays (40 cm × 50 cm, 20 pots per tray). Two liters of 1/2 strength Hoagland nutrient solution containing 0.5 mM NH4H2PO4 (control) or reduced NH4H2PO4 concentration to 5 μM (low-Pi, the reduction of N was supplied with NH4NO3) was poured into each tray and changed (with corresponding fresh nutrient solution) every 2 days to culture the plants for 20 days. The growth conditions during the experimental period were the same as that in salt treatment experiment.

Determination of Plant Growth

At the end of treatments, the shoot height and root length were measured by a flexible rule. The root volume was determined according to the method described by Musick et al. (1965). After that, the plants were dried in an oven at 80°C for 72 h and the total dry weight (DW) were determined.

Measurement of Total P Concentration

Total P concentrations were determined according to the method described by Pei et al. (2012) with minor modification. Briefly, plants were divided into leaves and roots and then were dried in an oven at 80°C for 72 h. After measuring the DWs, the samples were ashed in a Muffle furnace (TNX1700-30; Shinbae Industrial Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) at 600°C for 6 h. The ash samples were dissolved in 10 ml 1 M HCl anpan>d a few drops of pan> class="Chemical">HNO3. The Pi concentration was determined using a spectrophotometer (UV-6100PCS; Mapada Instruments Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China).

Measurement of Crude Protein (CP), Crude fiber(CFI), Crude Fat(CF), and Crude Ash (CA)in Shoot

The shoot samples from T1 transgenic n class="Species">alfalfa anpan>d WT planpan>ts were oven-dried for 72 h at 80°C anpan>d ground to pass a 1.0 mm screen. The contents of crude proteinpan> (CP), crude fibre (CFI), crude fat (CF), anpan>d crude ash (CA) were anpan>alyzed accordinpan>g to official methods from the National Stanpan>dards of P.R. Chinpan>a (GB/T 6432-94 for CP, SN/T 0800.8-1999 for CFI, GB/T 6433-2006 for CF, anpan>d GBT 6438-2007 for CA, respectively).

Assessment of Productivity and Forage Quality of T1 Transgenic Alfalfa in the Field Conditions

The location of the field trial is Yuzhong Experimental Station of Lanzhou University, of which detailed information were reported previously (Bao et al., 2016). The soil available nitrogen, pan> class="Chemical">phosphate and potassium in our experiment field were 4.1, 0.8, and 4.9 μmol/g dry soil, respectively, where the relative low available P content is actually the main limiting factor to growth of alfalfa. T1 transgenic alfalfa and WT were firstly cultured for 60 days in greenhouse, then the shoots were trimmed away and the remaining plants with 5 cm stubble were transplanted into the field in mid-May, 2014. The experiment design and irrigation regime were the same as that described by Bao et al. (2016). The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was measured every month after transplantation using an automatic photosynthetic measuring apparatus (GFS-3000; Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). After transplantation for 5 months, the shoot height was measured. Then the shoot was harvested and the shoot DW, the indicators of forage quality, and total P concentration were determined. Finally, the root sample was collected according to the method reported by Guo et al. (2004) and Xiao et al. (2015) with minor modification. Briefly, soil in an 80 cm × 80 cm quadrate around each single plant was sampled within a range of 60 cm depth using a spade. The thick roots were picked out, and then the soil sample was sieved through a 0.5 mm mesh screen to catch and retain fine roots. After washing with distilled n class="Chemical">water, the whole root sample was dried inpan> anpan> oven at 80°C for 72 h, then its DW anpan>d total P concentration were determinpan>ed.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed according to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by SPSS statistical software (Ver. 19.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and the significant differences among means were identified by Duncan’s multiple range tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. Data were presented as means ± SE (n = 9).

Results

T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Exhibits Enhanced Resistance to Salt and Drought Stress

The T1 progeny originated from T0 transgenic alfalfa expressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 genes (Bao et al., 2016) were screened for hygromycin resistance (as described in Experimental Procedures). No significant difference of the morphological phenotypes was observed between surviving T1 plants and WT. After that, random six surviving T1 plants were identified by PCR and RT-PCR methods. The result showed that all of tested plants co-expressed both ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 genes (data not shown). In order to assess the salt anpan>d drought toleranpan>ce of T1 tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1, GM and WT plants were cultured under non-stress conditions for 4 weeks, then treated with 200 mM NaCl or drought (30% of FWC) for 20 days. Under normal conditions (no NaCl application), T1 transgenic alfalfa exhibited a faster growth than WT; the shoot height, root length, and DW of GM were 63.4, 20.1, and 22.6% higher than for WT plants (Figure ). When treated with 200 mM NaCl, the growth were significantly inhibited in WT while unaffected in GM (except for the shoot height); the shoot height, root length, and DW of GM were significantly higher by 55.1, 40.5, and 39.3%, respectively, than that of WT plants (Figure ). Similarly, the GM showed significantly faster development compared to WT whether treated with drought or not. Under drought stress, the shoot height, root length, and DW of GM were 28.7, 67.7, and 47.5% higher than that of WT plants, respectively (Figure ). Moreover, we also observed that GM accumulated more Na+, K+, and Ca2+ than WT plants under either salinity or drought conditions (Supplementary Table ). The growth indicators of wild-type and T (A) Shoot height; (B) root length; (C) total DW. Values are the means ± SE (n = 9). Different letters after data indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among columns. WT, wild-type plants; GM, T1 tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1. The growth indicators of wild-type and T (A) Shoot height; (B) root length; (C) total DW. Values are the means ± SE (n = 9). Different letters after data indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among columns. WT, wild-type plants; GM, T1 tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1.

T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Exhibits Improved Adaptation to Phosphate (Pi) Deficiency

To investigate the growth performance of T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 in Pi deficiency conditions, four-week-old plants from GM and WT were treated with low-Pi (5 μM) for 20 days. Compared to WT, the GM showed taller and had greater biomass, and especially, developed a more robust root system, whether treated with low-Pi or not. Under low-Pi treatment, the shoot height and DW of GM were 14.6 and 41.2% higher than that of WT plants, respectively (Figures ). Of note, the root length and root volume of GM were significantly higher than that of WT by 25.5 and 61.4% under control, and by 21.3 and 17.1% under low-Pi treatment, respectively (Figures ). The T1 transgenic alfalfa accumulated more phosphorus (P) in leaves and roots under normal condition; after being subjected to low-Pi treatment for 20 days, the total P concentrations in leaves and roots of GM were significantly higher by 18.6 and 34.5% than that in WT plants (Figure ). The growth indicators of wild-type and T (A) Shoot height; (B) total dry weight (DW); (C) root length; (D) root volume. Values are the means ± SE (n = 9). Different letters after data indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among columns. WT, wild-type plants; GM, T1 tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1. Total P concentration in leaf Values are the means ± SE (n = 9). Different letters after data indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among columns. WT, wild-type plants; GM, T1 tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1.

T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Outperforms WT on Forage Quality in Greenhouse Condition

To assay the forage quality of T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1, CP, CFI, CF, and CA were determined in shoots of GM and WT plants. As showed in Table , under control conditions, GM exhibited significantly higher CP and CFI contents than WT by 8.9-20.3% and 18.3-23.7%, respectively. Under 200 mM NaCl, 30% of FWC or 5 μM Pi for 20 days, the CP and CFI contents of GM were 14.6-41.3% and 15.8-20.7% higher than that of WT plants, respectively, though these indicators declined (except for no change of CP in GM under drought) in all plants (Table ). On the other hand, when plants grew under normal conditions, CF and CA showed no difference between GM and WT plants. However, after treated with 200 mM NaCl, 30% of FWC or 5 μM Pi for 20 days, the amounts of CF were reduced by 66.1-73.4% in WT plants, whereas showed no significant change under NaCl treatment or decreased only by 46.2 and 42.9% under drought and low-Pi conditions, respectively; the CA content also decreased less in GM, which was16.3-52.1% higher than for WT plants under various stress conditions (Table ). The forage quality indicators of wild-type and T1 transgenic alfalfa treated with pan> class="Chemical">salt (200 mM NaCl), drought (30% of FWC), and low-Pi (5 μM Pi) for 20 days, respectively.

T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Exhibits Improved Growth and Forage Quality in the Field Conditions

To evaluate the potential productivity of T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 in semi-arid field conditions, trimmed-plants of GM transgenic line and WT were transplanted into the Yuzhong Experimental Station of Lanzhou University in mid-May, 2014. Compared to WT plants, GM had better growth under field conditions (Supplementary Figure ). After being transplanted for 5 months, the shoot height and shoot DW of GM were 25.1 and 54.1% higher than that of WT, respectively (Table ). Furthermore, GM exhibited significantly higher net Pn than WT plant since the second month of post-transplant. Five months after transplant, Pn of GM was 19.8% higher than that of WT plants (Supplementary Figure ). T1 transgenic alfalfa also developed a larger root system. After being transplanted for 5 months, the root DW of GM was 1.8-fold higher than for WT plants, and correspondingly, the root/shoot ratio of GM were significantly higher by 14.1% in comparison with WT plants (Table ). Meanwhile, GM absorbed more Pi with an increased total P concentration in plants (Table ). The growth indicators and total P concentration of wild-type and T1 transgenic n class="Species">alfalfa after tranpan>splanpan>ted inpan>to field condition for 5 months. In order to assess the forage quality of T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 in the field conditions, the nutrition indicators were measured in shoots. After being transplanted for 5 months, transgenic alfalfa accumulated more CP, CFI, CF, and CA in shoots. The contents of above indicators in GM were significantly higher by 15.9, 12.3, 37.1, and 30.9%, respectively, than in WT plants (Figure ). The forage quality indicators of wild-type and T Values are the means ± SE (n = 9). Asterisks indicate there is a significant difference (P < 0.05) between WT and GM. WT, wild-type planpan>ts; pan> class="Chemical">GM, T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1; CP, CP; CFI, crude fiber; CF, crude fat; CA, crude ash.

Discussion

T1 Transgenic Alfalfa Inherited Salt and Drought Tolerance from T0 Generation

In face of the challenges from salinization and desertification, improving the salt anpan>d drought resistanpan>ce of crops is most efficient anpan>d economical way to ensure the food security worldwide (Flowers, 2004; Bartels anpan>d Sunkar, 2005; Rozema anpan>d Flowers, 2008; Yanpan>g et al., 2010). Inpan> recent years, the development of molecular biology anpan>d tranpan>sgenic enginpan>eerinpan>g provides tools for creation of new cultivars with enhanpan>ced stress toleranpan>ce (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Herrera-Estrella, 2000; Yanpan>g et al., 2010; Tanpan>g et al., 2015; Zhanpan>g et al., 2016). Numerous studies have demonstrated that (co-)overexpression tonoplast NHX or/anpan>d pan> class="Gene">H+-PPase genes is one of the most effective strategies to create transgenic species with enhanced salt and drought tolerance through genetic engineering technology (e.g., Apse et al., 1999; Gaxiola et al., 2001, 2007; Zhao et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2010; Bhaskaran and Savithramma, 2011; Pasapula et al., 2011; Gouiaa et al., 2012; Bao et al., 2014; Bassil and Blumwald, 2014). To develop salt- and drought-resistant forage cultivar, we have co-transferred the tonoplast NHX and H+-PPase genes (ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1, respectively) from a xerophyte Z. xanthoxylum into the important legume forage alfalfa and successfully improved the salt and drought tolerance in T0 generation transgenic plants (Bao et al., 2016). In the present work, T1 generation transgenic alfalfa plants co-overexpressing ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 also exhibited enhanced salt and drought tolerance. They outperformed WT plants at either plant size or dry matter accumulation under salinity or drought conditions (Figures and ). These results suggest that T1 transgenic alfalfa inherited all stress resistant traits from T0 generation, and further support that co-overexpression of tonoplast NHX and H+-PPase genes from the xerophyte is a feasible way for enhancing salt and drought tolerance of crops. The better salt anpan>d drought toleranpan>ce of NHX anpan>d pan> class="Gene">H+-PPase transgenic plants could be explained as a consequence of increased ion compartmentation into vacuole resulting from increased expression of NHX and H+-PPase (Gaxiola et al., 2001, 2007; Leidi et al., 2010; Bao et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2015). Because vacuolar compartmentation of cations (such as, Na+ and K+) is mediated by NHXs and H+-PPase provides the proton motive force for this process as a tonoplast H+ pump (Apse et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2001; Gaxiola et al., 2002; Kronzucker and Britto, 2011; Yamaguchi et al., 2013). This mechanism may contribute to alleviating the toxicity of excessive Na+ in the cytosol, maintaining intracellular K+/Na+ homeostasis, and enhancing vacuolar osmoregulatory capacity (Apse et al., 1999; Blumwald, 2000; Gaxiola et al., 2007; Flowers et al., 2015; Volkov, 2015; Yuan et al., 2015). In our previous study, the co-overexpression of ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 genes resulted in higher Na+, K+, and Ca2+ accumulation in leaves and roots of T0 generation transgenic alfalfa (Bao et al., 2016). This conclusion is further supported by current work, in which T1 generation transgenic alfalfa also accumulated more cations under salinity or drought conditions (Supplementary Table ).

Co-overexpression of ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Enhances Phosphorus Nutrition and Productivity of T1 Transgenic Alfalfa

Phosphorus (P) is anpan> essential element required for planpan>t growth anpan>d development (Ma et al., 2012; Pei et al., 2012; Lv et al., 2015). pan> class="Chemical">Phosphate (Pi) is the main form of phosphorus that plant can absorb from soil, and thus is the most limiting factor for plant production in many regions all over the world since the content of available Pi in soil is commonly insufficient (Hinsinger, 2001; Vance et al., 2003; Gaxiola et al., 2011; MacDonald et al., 2011; Bargaz et al., 2016). Therefore, the development of crops with improved phosphorus nutrition will contribute to improvement of crop productivity and reduction of phosphorus fertilizer application (Gaxiola et al., 2011, 2012; Yang et al., 2014). Previous studies showed that Arabidopsis tonoplast H+-PPase (AVP1) is involved in regulation of Pi uptake of plants. The overexpression of AVP1 gene in tomato, rice, and Arabidopsis have significantly enhanced the growth performance of these species by improving P nutrition in plants (Yang et al., 2007, 2014; Gaxiola et al., 2012). Recent studies demonstrated that up-regulation of the tonoplast H+-PPase from other species also increased Pi uptake and thus conferred the low-Pi tolerance in transgenic plants, for example, maize expressing TsVP1 gene from Thellungiella halophile (Pei et al., 2012). Similar results were observed in our study: T1 transgenic alfalfa developed larger shoots with higher biomass accumulation under either low-Pi or control conditions (Figures ), which are consistent with increased P accumulation in GM (Figure ); field trial data also showed that T1 transgenic alfalfa grew faster with a higher total P concentration than WT after being transplanted into Pi-limiting soil without any P supplement (Supplementary Figure , Table ). These results suggest that increased P uptake capacity is one of the important contributors for improving productivity of T1 transgenic alfalfa, especially under the Pi-limiting conditions. This viewpoint is supported by the data from field trials that both T0 (Bao et al., 2016) and T1 (Supplementary Figure ) transgenic alfalfa displayed a higher photosynthetic capacity compared to WT, since the P level in plants has a tremendous effect on photosynthetic activity (Jacob and Lawlor, 1991; Dietz and Harris, 1997; Pei et al., 2012), even can improve the salt tolerance of common bean (Bargaz et al., 2016). Enhancement of Pi uptake in transgenic alfalfa could be explainpan>ed as a consequence of larger roots, which may result from inpan>creased expression of pan> class="Gene">H+-PPase in transgenic plants (Gaxiola et al., 2007, 2011, 2012). Li et al. (2005) reported that H+-PPase is involved in root development of Arabidopsis by regulating the auxin transport and distribution. However, subsequent evidences indicated that AVP1 seems not to be required for auxin transport (Ferjani et al., 2011, 2012; Kriegel et al., 2015). Interestingly, two recent studies revealed a novel function of H+-PPase in regulating the long-distance transport of photosynthate from source to sink (particularly, to root) by localizing to the plasma membrane of phloem companion cells (Pizzio et al., 2015; Khadilkar et al., 2016). In the present study, T1 transgenic alfalfa developed a larger root system than WT with increased root size and root/shoot ratio under both greenhouse (Figures ) and field conditions (Table ), and thus showed an increased productivity under various conditions (Figures ; Table ). These phenotypes are consistent with the observations from other transgenic plants expressing H+-PPase (e.g., Park et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2007, 2014; Lv et al., 2008; Bao et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2010). A more robust root system would facilitate the uptake of nutrients and water, which are essential to plant growth in various environments.

Co-overexpression of ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 Improves Forage Quality in T1 Transgenic Alfalfa

Higher quality is one of most important objectives for forage breeding, since forage quality affects animal’s growth and development, as well as the yield and quality of animal products (Yu et al., 2013; Musco et al., 2016). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the nutritive value of a potential breeding material before developing it into the new forage cultivar. In this study, the contents of CP and CF, which are important nutritive indicators (Musco et al., 2016), showed higher in T1 transgenic alfalfa thanpan> inpan> WT under salinpan>ity, drought, low-Pi (Table ) anpan>d field conditions (Figure ). This may be due to enhanpan>ced stress toleranpan>ce inpan> tranpan>sgenic pan> class="Species">alfalfa, which protects intracellular biochemical synthesis from harsh environments (Zhu, 2001; Flowers et al., 2015). More importantly, transgenic alfalfa accumulated more CP under no-stress conditions (Table ), which could be explained as a consequence of increased nitrogen uptake capacity in transgenic plants by up-expressing H+-PPase gene (Paez-Valencia et al., 2013). Our study also showed that transgenic alfalfa deposited more CFI in shoots than WT (Table , Figure ). This may contribute to the reinforcement of cell wall in transgenic plants, since the CFI is mainly composed of cellulose and hemicellulose, which are two major components of the cell wall (Carpota, 1996; Wolf et al., 2012). The tight cell walls are important for improving the mechanical strength of plants, which allows transgenic alfalfa to grow to greater height and to reduce the loss of cellular water (Darley et al., 2001; Wolf et al., 2012). Moreover, transgenic alfalfa plants also contained more CA than WT plants under various stresses (Table ) and field conditions (Figure ), which may result from the augmented cations (such as, Na+, K+, and Ca2+) accumulation in transgenic alfalfa (Bao et al., 2016). These results indicated that the transgenic alfalfa possesses a higher forage quality.

Conclusion

The data in this study demonstrate that T1 transgenic alfalfa co-overexpressinpan>g pan> class="Chemical">ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 genes shows much better tolerance to Pi deficiency, besides the salt and drought. And especially, T1 transgenic alfalfa also exhibits improved productivity and higher forage quality. This study laid a solid foundation for developing new alfalfa cultivars with high yield, good quality and wide adaptability on the marginal lands of northern China.

Author Contributions

PK, A-KB, and S-MW, conceived the study and designed the experiments; PK performed most of the work; TK, Y-QP, ZB, and FW provided the assistance to experiments and data analysis. PK and A-KB wrote the article. S-MW gave valuable suggestions on the article.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

The forage quality indicators of wild-type and T1 transgenic alfalfa treated with salt (200 mM NaCl), drought (30% of FWC), and low-Pi (5 μM Pi) for 20 days, respectively.

ExperimentsTreatmentLinesCrude protein (CP) (mg/g DW)Crude fibre (mg/g DW)Crude fat (mg/g DW)Crude ash (mg/g DW)
SaltControlWT166.3 ± 1.8b209.4 ± 1.7b23.5 ± 2.8a97.0 ± 4.3a
GM183.0 ± 1.4a249.3 ± 3.7a26.3 ± 1.0a105.7 ± 5.5a
200 mM NaClWT135.2 ± 1.3d152.3 ± 1.7d8.0 ± 0.6b52.5 ± 1.9c
GM154.9 ± 4.2c176.4 ± 5.1c25.3 ± 1.0a79.8 ± 3.8b
DroughtControlWT140.8 ± 1.7b169.9 ± 1.9b24.8 ± 1.0a73.5 ± 3.1a
GM169.4 ± 4.2a201.0 ± 2.7a27.7 ± 1.6a82.5 ± 5.4a
30% of FWCWT124.4 ± 2.8c119.5 ± 3.2d6.6 ± 0.3c51.9 ± 1.8c
GM175.8 ± 4.0a144.2 ± 3.5c14.9 ± 1.5b61.4 ± 1.9b
Low-PiControlWT161.6 ± 3.1b198.2 ± 8.1b25.3 ± 1.0a109.0 ± 6.5a
GM176.0 ± 4.4a245.2 ± 6.3a27.2 ± 1.1a111.6 ± 4.3a
5 μM PiWT98.4 ± 2.4d83.0 ± 1.6d8.2 ± 0.8c62.5 ± 1.8c
GM122.2 ± 9.2c96.8 ± 4.2c15.5 ± 1.1b72.7 ± 1.1b
Table 2

The growth indicators and total P concentration of wild-type and T1 transgenic alfalfa after transplanted into field condition for 5 months.

LinesShoot height (cm)Shoot dry weight (DW) (g/plant)Root DW (g/plant)Root/shoot ratioTotal P concentration (μmol/g DW)
WT63.2 ± 1.6b96.5 ± 3.6b56.6 ± 2.7b0.57 ± 0.02b83.9 ± 1.4b
GM79.0 ± 1.9a148.6 ± 7.0a102.0 ± 3.8a0.65 ± 0.03a90.4 ± 1.9a
  53 in total

1.  Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit.

Authors:  H X Zhang; E Blumwald
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  The molecular basis of plant cell wall extension.

Authors:  C P Darley; A M Forrester; S J McQueen-Mason
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) in cotton improves drought- and salt tolerance and increases fibre yield in the field conditions.

Authors:  Vijaya Pasapula; Guoxin Shen; Sundaram Kuppu; Julio Paez-Valencia; Marisol Mendoza; Pei Hou; Jian Chen; Xiaoyun Qiu; Longfu Zhu; Xianlong Zhang; Dick Auld; Eduardo Blumwald; Hong Zhang; Roberto Gaxiola; Paxton Payton
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 4.  Plant proton pumps.

Authors:  Roberto A Gaxiola; Michael G Palmgren; Karin Schumacher
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Intracellular NHX-type cation/H+ antiporters in plants.

Authors:  Maria Reguera; Elias Bassil; Eduardo Blumwald
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 13.164

Review 6.  Biotechnological advancements in alfalfa improvement.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The ins and outs of intracellular ion homeostasis: NHX-type cation/H(+) transporters.

Authors:  Elias Bassil; Eduardo Blumwald
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 7.834

8.  Constitutive and Companion Cell-Specific Overexpression of AVP1, Encoding a Proton-Pumping Pyrophosphatase, Enhances Biomass Accumulation, Phloem Loading, and Long-Distance Transport.

Authors:  Aswad S Khadilkar; Umesh P Yadav; Carolina Salazar; Vladimir Shulaev; Julio Paez-Valencia; Gaston A Pizzio; Roberto A Gaxiola; Brian G Ayre
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  A Novel Soybean Intrinsic Protein Gene, GmTIP2;3, Involved in Responding to Osmotic Stress.

Authors:  Dayong Zhang; Jinfeng Tong; Xiaolan He; Zhaolong Xu; Ling Xu; Peipei Wei; Yihong Huang; Marian Brestic; Hongxiang Ma; Hongbo Shao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Control of vacuolar dynamics and regulation of stomatal aperture by tonoplast potassium uptake.

Authors:  Zaida Andrés; Javier Pérez-Hormaeche; Eduardo O Leidi; Kathrin Schlücking; Leonie Steinhorst; Deirdre H McLachlan; Karin Schumacher; Alistair M Hetherington; Jörg Kudla; Beatriz Cubero; José M Pardo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Properties of Photosystem II lacking the PsbJ subunit.

Authors:  Alain Boussac; Julien Sellés; Marion Hamon; Miwa Sugiura
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Chloride facilitates Mn(III) formation during photoassembly of the Photosystem II oxygen-evolving complex.

Authors:  Brandon P Russell; David J Vinyard
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Location of two Mn2+ affinity sites in photosystem II detected by pulsed electron-electron double resonance.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mino; Mizue Asada
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Co-overexpression of the Constitutively Active Form of OsbZIP46 and ABA-Activated Protein Kinase SAPK6 Improves Drought and Temperature Stress Resistance in Rice.

Authors:  Yu Chang; Ba Hoanh Nguyen; Yongjun Xie; Benze Xiao; Ning Tang; Wenliu Zhu; Tongmin Mou; Lizhong Xiong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Root exudates and rhizosphere soil bacterial relationships of Nitraria tangutorum are linked to k-strategists bacterial community under salt stress.

Authors:  Yaqing Pan; Peng Kang; Min Tan; Jinpeng Hu; Yaqi Zhang; Jinlin Zhang; Naiping Song; Xinrong Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.