Taha Nazir1, Nida Taha2, Azahrul Islam3, Suraj Abraham4, Adeel Mahmood5, Mazhar Mustafa6. 1. Biochemistry, Chemical Pathology, Molecular Biology Research Group, UMC&RC, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100 Pakistan. tahanazir@yahoo.com; Intellectual Consortium of Drug Discovery & Technology Development Inc., 937-Northumerland Ave, Saskatoon SK S7L3E4 Canada raonidataha@gmail.com. 2. Intellectual Consortium of Drug Discovery & Technology Development Inc., 937-Northumerland Ave, Saskatoon SK S7L3E4 Canada raonidataha@gmail.com. 3. Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA. islam@lsu.edu. 4. INRS 531, boulevard des Prairies Laval (Québec) H7V 1B7 Canada suraj_ace@yahoo.com. 5. Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, PO; 45550, Pakistan. adeel.mahmood@comsats.edu.pk. 6. Operations Manager, Emirates Medical Services, Fujairah, UAE drmazhar@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neoplasm is still a potential threat for breast, Non-Small Cell Lung (NSCL) and cervix cancer patients. Those gradually invade into other body organs, inducing complex pathological complications. Whereas, the anticancer drugs suppress the bone marrow, resulting serious hematological toxicities. Thus, the monocytic toxicity may the chance of infections, particularly in AID's patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed this retrospective study to investigate the monocytopenia induced by vinorelbine following chemotherapy in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total 60 adult cancer patients were divided into two groups; Group-1 patients received the treatment of Vinorelbine alone while group 2 patients received Vinorelbine based combination chemotherapy. RESULT: The overall comparison of mean monocyte count (×103 per μl) with time showed a significant statistical difference (p value <0.001) for G-I and no significant difference for G-II (p value <0.08). The independent comparison of mean values for two groups at every week confirms the non-significant statistical difference during all of the five weeks (p values 0.551, 0.112, 0.559, 0.372, 0.468 respectively). In addition of that, the comparison of mean values observed before therapy with that of week 4 (after therapy) showed significant difference in G-I (p value <0.001) and non-significant in G-II (p value 0.053). CONCLUSION: Monocytopenia is induced in both of the chemotherapy protocols allows the clinical oncologists and consultant physicians to select either of the chemotherapy protocol. The therapeutic efficacy should constitute the intervening consideration to treat the breast, cervix and NSCL (Non-Small Cell Lung's) cancers.
BACKGROUND: The neoplasm is still a potential threat for breast, Non-Small Cell Lung (NSCL) and cervix cancerpatients. Those gradually invade into other body organs, inducing complex pathological complications. Whereas, the anticancer drugs suppress the bone marrow, resulting serious hematological toxicities. Thus, the monocytic toxicity may the chance of infections, particularly in AID'spatients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed this retrospective study to investigate the monocytopenia induced by vinorelbine following chemotherapy in cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total 60 adult cancerpatients were divided into two groups; Group-1 patients received the treatment of Vinorelbine alone while group 2 patients received Vinorelbine based combination chemotherapy. RESULT: The overall comparison of mean monocyte count (×103 per μl) with time showed a significant statistical difference (p value <0.001) for G-I and no significant difference for G-II (p value <0.08). The independent comparison of mean values for two groups at every week confirms the non-significant statistical difference during all of the five weeks (p values 0.551, 0.112, 0.559, 0.372, 0.468 respectively). In addition of that, the comparison of mean values observed before therapy with that of week 4 (after therapy) showed significant difference in G-I (p value <0.001) and non-significant in G-II (p value 0.053). CONCLUSION:Monocytopenia is induced in both of the chemotherapy protocols allows the clinical oncologists and consultant physicians to select either of the chemotherapy protocol. The therapeutic efficacy should constitute the intervening consideration to treat the breast, cervix and NSCL (Non-Small Cell Lung's) cancers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast Cancer; Cisplatin; Doxorubicin; Monocytopenia; NSCLC; Vinorelbine
Authors: Linda J M Oostendorp; Peep F M Stalmeier; A Rogier T Donders; Winette T A van der Graaf; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Filip K Swirski; Matthias Nahrendorf; Martin Etzrodt; Moritz Wildgruber; Virna Cortez-Retamozo; Peter Panizzi; Jose-Luiz Figueiredo; Rainer H Kohler; Aleksey Chudnovskiy; Peter Waterman; Elena Aikawa; Thorsten R Mempel; Peter Libby; Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet Journal: Science Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mary A Forget; Jeffrey L Voorhees; Sara L Cole; Duaa Dakhlallah; Ivory L Patterson; Amy C Gross; Leni Moldovan; Xiaokui Mo; Randall Evans; Clay B Marsh; Tim D Eubank Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: N Tubiana-Mathieu; P Bougnoux; D Becquart; A Chan; P-F Conte; F Majois; M Espie; M Morand; N Vaissiere; G Villanova Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 7.640