Literature DB >> 27833472

Integrated glycomic analysis of ovarian cancer side population cells.

Ran Zhao1, Xiaoxia Liu2,3, Congjian Xu1,2,4,3, Shifang Ren5, Yisheng Wang2,3, Xiaoxiang Jie4, Ruihuan Qin5, Wenjun Qin5, Mengyu Zhang2, Haiyan Tai2, Caiting Yang5, Lili Li5, Peike Peng5, Miaomiao Shao5, Xingwang Zhang5, Hao Wu5, Yuanyuan Ruan5, Jianxin Gu5.   

Abstract

<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <span class="Disease">Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to its frequent recurrence and drug resistance even after successful initial treatment. Accumulating scientific evidence indicates that subpopulations of cancer cells with stem cell-like properties, such as so-called side population (SP) cells, are primarily responsible for these recurrences. A better understanding of SP cells may provide new clues for detecting and targeting these cancer-initiating cells and ultimately help to eradicate cancer. Changes in glycosylation patterns are remarkable features of SP cells. Here, we isolated SP cells from ovarian cancer cell lines and analyzed their glycosylation patterns using multiple glycomic strategies.
METHODS: Six high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines were used for SP cell isolation. Among them, HO8910 pm, which contained the highest proportion of SP cells, was used for glycomic analysis of SP cells. Cell lysate of SP cells and main population cells was applied to lectin microarray and mass spectrometry for glycan profiling. Differently expressed glycan structures were further verified by lectin blot, flow cytometry, and real-time PCR analysis of their relevant enzymes.
RESULTS: Expression of core fucosylated N-glycan and tumor-associated Tn, T and sT antigens were increased in SP cells. By contrast, SP cells exhibited decreased hybrid glycan, α2,3-linked sialic glycan and multivalent sialyl-glycan.
CONCLUSIONS: Glycan structures, such as Tn, T, sT antigens, and core fucosylation may serve as biomarkers of ovarian cancer stem cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Glycomic; Ovarian cancer stem cells; T antigen; Tn antigen; sT antigen

Year:  2016        PMID: 27833472      PMCID: PMC5103398          DOI: 10.1186/s12014-016-9131-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Proteomics        ISSN: 1542-6416            Impact factor:   3.988


Background

<span class="Disease">Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological <span class="Disease">malignancies [1]. The high mortality rate of ovarian cancer has been attributed both to late diagnosis due to lack of early symptoms and to recurrence accompanied by drug resistance [2-4]. Although 80% of patients are initially responsive to optimal cytoreductive surgery plus platinum-based chemotherapy, recurrent cancer is inevitable in vast majority of cases. Along with recurrence, drug resistance develops, leading to death in 70% of ovarian cancer patients [5]. Thus, recurrence and drug resistance are main challenges in ovarian cancer treatment. Accumulating scientific evidence suggests that <span class="Disease">tumors are driven by relatively rare and biologically distinct <span class="Disease">cancer-initiating cells, so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are capable of self-renewal and further differentiation [6-8]. These cells are resistant to regular chemotherapy because they remain quiescent for a long time, proliferate slowly and excrete drugs easily [7, 8]. Detecting and eliminating CSCs would prohibit relapse and improve survival of ovarian cancer patients [9]. Glycosylation is the most prevalent post-translational modification involved in many physiological and pathological processes. A large number of studies have demonstrated that <span class="Chemical">glycans participate in cancer initiation [10], development [11-14], and drug resistance [15]. In addition, several reports have suggested that glycans and glycosyltransferases play important roles in CSC function. For example, increased fucosylation promotes invasive and metastatic properties of head and neck cancer stem cells [16]. β1,4-N-Acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GalNAcT) III modulates the stemness of colon cancer via EGFR signaling pathway [17]. Glycans can also serve as potential CSC biomarkers. In combination with traditional biomarkers, glycans can be used to isolate more malignant CSCs. For example, anti-CD133 antibody, together with SSA (Sambucus sieboldiana) lectin, can identify CSCs of higher tumourigenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma [18]. Moreover, expression pattern of certain glycans on CSCs is distinct from that on normal stem cells, thus may improve the specificity of detecting and targeting CSCs [19]. Consequently, glycan biomarkers have more advantages with fewer side effects to harm the normal stem cells than general CSC markers. Glycomic analysis may provide comprehensive glycome profiles and potential biomarkers of CSCs. The specific glycans of CSCs have potential clinical value as targets in patients undergoing chemotherapy. So far, little is known about <span class="Disease">glycosylation of ovarian CSCs. In this study, an integrated strategy using lectin array and mass spectrometry (MS) was employed to obtain the global glyco-information of <span class="Disease">ovarian cancer side population (SP) cells. Core fucosylated N-glycan and tumor-associated Tn, T and sT antigens were increased, while hybrid glycan, α2,3-linked sialic glycan and multivalent sialyl-glycan were decreased in SP cells. These differentially expressed glycans may serve as potential biomarkers of ovarian cancer SP cells.

Methods

Cell culture

The <span class="Species">human high-grade <span class="Disease">serous ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and HO8910 and their highly metastatic sublines SKOV3 ip and HO8910 pm were purchased from the cell bank of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (China). The high-grade ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and its cisplatin-resistant subline A2780-cp were obtained from Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (China). All cell lines were routinely cultured in DMEM (Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco).

Side population sorting

SP sorting was performed as previously described [20]. Briefly, the fluorescent dye <span class="Chemical">Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a cell suspension (1 × 106 cells/ml) at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml. After incubation at 37 °C for 90 min, the cells were treated with 2 μg/ml <span class="Chemical">propidium iodide (PI) and sorted on a MoFlo XDP cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Cells treated with verapamil before Hoechst 33342 staining were used as negative control. Main population cells at the G0 stage were collected.

Spheroid formation assay

SP cells or MP cells were seeded at 2000 per well in 24-well Ultra Low plates (Corning, New York, NY, USA) in <span class="Chemical">DMEM/<span class="Chemical">F12 medium (Gibco) containing 20 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor, 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 2% B27, insulin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 2 mg/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured for 21 days.

Cell cycle analysis

After cell sorting, 5 × 105 SP cells and MP cells were suspended in <span class="Chemical">phosphate-buffered saline (<span class="Chemical">PBS) buffer containing 50 μg/ml PI dividedly, incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature, and analyzed with a CyAn ADP flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed with ModFit LT for Windows version 3.1.

Lectin microarray

After sorting, SP cells and MP cells were washed several times with <span class="Chemical">PBS and frozen at −80 °C. For lectin microarray analysis, 1 × 105 cells were resuspended in 1 ml of <span class="Chemical">PBS-T (containing 1% TritonX-100), followed by sonication for 15 min and centrifugation at 14,000g for 15 min. The supernatant was recovered. Proteins were quantitated using a micro BCA kit (Thermo Scientific) and labelled with fluorescent dye Cy3 (Thermo Scientific). Samples with protein concentration of 250 ng/ml were applied to a LecChip (Glyco Technica) and incubated at 20 °C for 16 h. The chip was then scanned with a GlycoStation Reader 1200 (Glyco Technica) confocal scanner. Each lectin in LecChip has three replicates. To be normalized, intensity of each well in lectin microarray was divided by the mean of total 135 wells’ intensity of the chip. We repeated lectin microarray analysis of SP and MP cells using independent samples to overcome biological bias.

Cell lysis preparation for mass spectrometry analysis

SP cells were rinsed with <span class="Chemical">PBS. After washing, 2% <span class="Chemical">SDS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Roche Applied Science, Meylan, France) was used to lyse the cells at 100 °C for 15 min. The lysate was then centrifuged at 14,000g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected. The protein concentration in the supernatant was quantitated using a BCA kit (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA).

N-Glycan release and purification

For each cell line, 400 μg of protein in 200 μl of 2% <span class="Chemical">SDS was added to 200 μl of 8 M <span class="Chemical">urea (Sigma-Aldrich) containing dithiothreitol (Sigma-Aldrich) to achieve a final concentration of 10 mM. After heating at 56 °C for 20 min, the samples were incubated in 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 25 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. The sample was transferred to an ultrafiltration unit (Amicon Ultra-0.5, Ultracel-10 membrane; Millipore, Billerica, MA) and centrifuged at 14,000g for 15 min. A volume of 200 μl of 40 mM NH4HCO3 was added to the ultrafiltration unit and centrifuged to wash the sample. Thereafter, 2 μl of PNGase F (New England BioLab, Ipswich, MA) in 200 μl of 40 mM NH4HCO3 was added to the device and incubated with shaking for 24 h at 37 °C. The ultrafiltration unit was transferred to a new collection tube and centrifuged at 14,000g for 15 min, and the filter membrane was washed with 200 μl of 40 mM NH4HCO3 for three times. The solution in the collection tube was recovered and lyophilizedin a vacuum freeze dryer (Martin Christ GmbH, Osterode, Germany). To remove sialic acids, each sample was reconstituted in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) followed by desialylation with neuraminidase (15 mU) from V. cholerae (Roche) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 37 °C overnight. Subsequently, all samples were dried in a SpeedVac and redissolved in 50 μl of water (with 0.1% TFA). The <span class="Chemical">N-glycans in solution were purified and desalted using a Porous Graphic <span class="Chemical">Carbon Solid-Phase Extraction (PGC-SPE) as previously described [21]. The PGC-SPE microcolumn was a GELoader tip filled with porous graphic carbon powder. The microcolumn was prepared with 6 volumes of 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in 80% acetonitrile (ACN)/H2O (v/v) and equilibrated with water. The N-glycan solution was passed through the microcolumn 5 times to ensure complete adsorption. The N-glycans were eluted with 400 μl of 0.05% (v/v) TFA in 25% (v/v) ACN and lyophilized.

Mass spectrometry analysis

<span class="Chemical">N-Glycans were characterized by AXIMA Resonance MALDI QIT TOF MS (Shimadzu Corp, Kyoto, Japan). The lyophilized desialylated <span class="Chemical">glycans were resuspended in 20 μl of water. Each sample (1 μl) was spotted on a MALDI target and dried in air at room temperature. To recrystallize the glycans, 1 μl of 12.5 mg/ml 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix (DHB, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) dissolved in 50% ACN containing 0.1% TFA was added to the sample target. Each sample was spotted in five replicates. Glycan structures were analyzed using Glyco Workbench (http://code.google.com/p/glycoworkbench/). Launchpad software (Shimadzu Biotech, Kyoto, Japan) was used to acquire and process the MALDI MS data. The relative peak intensities were calculated as previously described [22, 23], that relative intensity of each type of <span class="Chemical">N-glycan was calculated by dividing the intensity of a given type of <span class="Chemical">N-glycan by sum of the total 25 N-glycans intensity. Relative standard deviation (RSD) percentages based on relative intensity values were used to estimate the stability of mass spectrometry. Relative intensity of the five replicates of a certain N-glycan were averaged and compared between SP and MP cells. p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SP/MP ratios were calculated to express magnitude of changes. Cut-off of significant changes was set as >1.5 or <0.67 folds.

Lectin blot

The proteins isolated from SP cells and MP cells were analyzed by <span class="Chemical">SDS-PAGE and lectin blot. In brief, samples were mixed with 5× loading buffer, boiled and separated by 10% <span class="Chemical">SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins in the gels were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The PVDF membranes were blocked with TBST (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl, 0.05% v/v Tween 20, pH 7.5) containing 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with biotinylated Agaricus bisporus (ABA; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or Vicia villosa lectin (VVA; Vector Laboratories) for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with TBST for 3 times, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase streptavidin (Vector Laboratories) for 30 min at room temperature. Signals were subsequently detected using an ECL assay kit.

Total RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted with <span class="Chemical">TRIzol™ reagent (Invitrogen, Carl<span class="Chemical">sbad, CA, USA), and 2 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using an RT Master Mix kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan). Real-time PCR analysis was performed using an ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Switzerland) for 40 cycles (15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C). A 2-μl aliquot of cDNA was amplified in 20 μl system using the SYBR-green Premix Real-time PCR kit (Takara) system according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The primer sequences were as follows: GAPDH, GTCAAGGCTGAGAACGGGAA (forward) and AAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTC (reverse); Oct4, GACAACAATGAAAATCTTCAGGAGA (forward) and TTCTGGCGCCGGTTACAGAACCA (reverse); Nanog, CAAAGGCAAACAACCCACTT (forward) and TCTGCTGGAGGCTGAGGTAT (reverse); Fut8, TCTTCATCCCCGTCCTCCA (forward) and GAGACACCCACCACACTGCA (reverse); C1galt1, CATCCCTTTGTGCCAGAACACC (forward) and GCAAGATCAGAGCAGCAACCAG (reverse); St3gal1, GGGCAGACAGCAAAGGGAA (forward) and GGCCGTCACGTTAGACTCAAA (reverse).

Flow cytometry

After sorting, the SP cells and MP cells were cultured for 5 weeks in the previously mentioned medium in 6-well Ultra Low plates (Corning). The spheres were divided into single cells, stained with fluorescent-labelled <span class="Chemical">ABA and VVA (Vector Laboratories) for 15 min at room temperature, and detected using CyAn <span class="Chemical">ADP (Beckman Coulter).

Statistical analyses

Means of continuous data were compared using Student’s t test by SPSS software (version 16.0), p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results shown in figures were expressed as mean ± SD.

Results

Ovarian cancer SP cells exhibit stem cell-like properties

To enrich SP cells, we analyzed six <span class="Disease">serous ovarian cancer cell lines, including <span class="CellLine">SKOV3, HO8910 and their highly metastatic derivatives SKOV3 ip and HO8910 pm, as well as A2780 and its drug-resistant derivative A2780 cp. HO8910 pm cells exhibited 4.63% Hoechst low staining SP cells, as previously reported [20] (Fig. 1a). Other cell lines exhibited only small amounts of SP cells, which were inadequate for glycoprofiling. Thus, we chose HO8910 pm cells for further studies.
Fig. 1

Separation of SP cells from the HO8910 pm cell line and verification of their stemness. a Detection of SP cells from high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells lines. Cells were stained with the dye Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry. The ratio of SP cells was highest in HO8910 pm cells. b The spheres that formed after 21 days of culturing in an ultra-low attachment plate were much larger of SP cells than MP cells. c More spheres formed of SP cells than MP cells. d The mRNA expression of Oct4 and Nanog was up-regulated in SP cells. e SP cells were arrested in G1 stage

Separation of SP cells from the <span class="CellLine">HO8910 pm cell line and verification of their stemness. a Detection of SP cells from high-grade <span class="Disease">serous ovarian cancer cells lines. Cells were stained with the dye Hoechst 33342 and analyzed by flow cytometry. The ratio of SP cells was highest in HO8910 pm cells. b The spheres that formed after 21 days of culturing in an ultra-low attachment plate were much larger of SP cells than MP cells. c More spheres formed of SP cells than MP cells. d The mRNA expression of Oct4 and Nanog was up-regulated in SP cells. e SP cells were arrested in G1 stage Compared with the main population (MP) cells, SP cells exhibited higher self-<span class="Gene">renewal capacity. After plating in ultra-low attachment plates for 3 weeks, the SP cells formed significantly larger numbers of spheroids than MP cells. Moreover, the spheroids of SP cells were much larger in size (Fig. 1b, c). To further characterize the stem cell-like features of SP cells, we analyzed the expression of stem genes using real-time PCR. Both <span class="Gene">Oct-4 and Nanog were over-expressed in SP cells (Fig. 1d). CSCs are considered to reside in a stable quiescent state in the G0 state of the cell cycle and are therefore resistant to chemotherapies [7]. We also examined the cell cycle of SP cells: nearly 97.5% were arrested in the G0/G1 state (Fig. 1e), whereas only 66.17% of unsorted HO8910 pm cells were in the G1 state.

Lectin array analysis of SP cells and MP cells

To obtain more comprehensive information about the global glycosylation of SP cells, lectin array including 45 lectins were analyzed. Signal intensity of 9 lectins were significantly diffe<span class="Gene">rent between SP and MP cells in both of the two experiments (Fig. 2; Table 1).
Fig. 2

Lectin array analysis of SP cells and MP cells. a Relative intensities of 45 lectins in SP cells compared with MP cells for two experiments. b Fluorescence intensities of SP cells (up) and MP cells (down)

Table 1

Variation of glycans determined by lectin microarray analysis of SP cells and MP cells

No.LectinPreferred glycan structure (terminal epitope)SP1 ± SDMP1 ± SDSP1/MP1SP2 ± SDMP2 ± SDSP2/MP2
1LTLFuc α1-3(Gal β1-4)GlcNAc (Lex), Fuc α1-2(Gal β1-4)GlcNAc0.40 ± 0.020.40 ± 0.021.000.42 ± 0.020.45 ± 0.020.95
2PSAFuc α1-6GlcNAc, α-D-Glc, α-D-Man0.78 ± 0.010.79 ± 0.060.990.82 ± 0.040.88 ± 0.020.93
3LCAFuc α1-6GlcNAc, α-D-Glc, α-D-Man0.91 ± 0.070.84 ± 0.061.080.89 ± 0.010.89 ± 0.030.99
4UEA-IFuc α1-2(Gal β1-4)GlcNAc0.41 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.030.78**0.60 ± 0.020.61 ± 0.010.99
5AOLFuc α1-6GlcNAc (core Fuc), Fuc α1-2(Gal β1-4)GlcNAc0.93 ± 0.340.65 ± 0.041.430.58 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.041.05
6AALªFuc α1-6GlcNAc (core Fuc), Fuc α1-3(Gal β1-4)GlcNAc (Lex)1.22 ± 0.091.07 ± 0.041.14*0.95 ± 0.050.87 ± 0.011.10*
7MALªSia α2-3Gal β1-4GlcNAc0.47 ± 0.020.60 ± 0.010.77***0.63 ± 0.020.70 ± 0.010.90**
8SNASia α2-6Gal/GalNAc0.82 ± 0.021.01 ± 0.050.81**1.03 ± 0.030.90 ± 0.031.14**
9SSASia α2-6Gal/GalNAc0.75 ± 0.040.90 ± 0.060.84*1.03 ± 0.010.92 ± 0.011.11***
10TJA-ISia α2-6Gal/GalNAc1.65 ± 0.012.28 ± 0.080.73***1.66 ± 0.151.56 ± 0.061.06
11PHA-LTri/Tetra-antennary complex-type N-glycan0.45 ± 0.030.45 ± 0.011.000.54 ± 0.010.59 ± 0.010.91**
12ECAGal β1-4GlcNAc0.86 ± 0.040.93 ± 0.040.931.12 ± 0.041.18 ± 0.040.95
13RCA120Gal β1-4GlcNAc1.60 ± 0.072.43 ± 0.200.66**2.13 ± 0.082.25 ± 0.120.95
14PHA-EComplex-type N-glycans with outer Gal and bisecting GlcNAc0.75 ± 0.051.33 ± 0.060.57***1.01 ± 0.020.88 ± 0.051.15*
15DSAª(GlcNAc β1-4)n, Gal β1-4GlcNAc, Tri/Tetra-antennary N-glycans1.75 ± 0.032.21 ± 0.060.79***1.78 ± 0.042.04 ± 0.040.87**
16GSL-IIAgalactosylated tri/tetra antennary glycans, GlcNAc0.48 ± 0.020.31 ± 0.001.52***0.44 ± 0.020.43 ± 0.011.04
17NPAHigh Man, Man α1-6Man1.52 ± 0.171.68 ± 0.030.901.41 ± 0.041.38 ± 0.071.02
18ConAHigh Man, Man α1-6(Man α1-3)Man (inhibited by presence of bisecting GlcNAc)2.29 ± 0.232.23 ± 0.161.031.68 ± 0.111.59 ± 0.091.06
19GNAHigh Man, Man α1-3Man0.98 ± 0.081.10 ± 0.010.891.02 ± 0.020.97 ± 0.031.05
20HHLHigh Man, Man α1-3Man, Man α1-6Man0.67 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.011.17*0.75 ± 0.020.74 ± 0.031.01
21ACGSia α2-3Gal β1-4GlcNAc1.36 ± 0.181.59 ± 0.090.851.38 ± 0.071.57 ± 0.050.88*
22TxLC-IMan3 core, bi- and tri-antennary complex-type N-glycan, GalNAc1.06 ± 0.040.80 ± 0.051.32**0.97 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.041.04
23BPLGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T)), GalNAc0.54 ± 0.050.53 ± 0.031.010.66 ± 0.020.63 ± 0.021.05
24TJA-IIFuc α1-2Gal β1-4, GalNAcβ1-4 groups at their nonreducing terminals0.92 ± 0.041.01 ± 0.020.90*1.11 ± 0.061.12 ± 0.030.99
25EELGal α1-3Gal β1-4GlcNAc, Fuc α1-2(Gal α1-3)Galβ1-4GlcNAc0.58 ± 0.040.33 ± 0.021.74**0.51 ± 0.020.52 ± 0.010.98
26ABAªGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T)), GlcNAc, sialyl-T2.16 ± 0.080.84 ± 0.062.58***0.89 ± 0.010.84 ± 0.011.06*
27LELª(GlcNAc β1-4)n, (Gal β1-4GlcNAc)n (polyLacNAc)2.39 ± 0.122.75 ± 0.160.87*2.95 ± 0.083.16 ± 0.090.94*
28STL(GlcNAc)n, (GlcNAc β1-4MurNAc)n (peptidoglycan backbone)1.77 ± 0.132.19 ± 0.140.81*2.21 ± 0.162.36 ± 0.090.94
29UDAGlcNAc β1-4GlcNAc, Mixture of Man5 to Man9 1.65 ± 0.162.09 ± 0.320.791.62 ± 0.211.94 ± 0.260.84
30PWM(GlcNAc α1-4)n 0.52 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.080.900.82 ± 0.000.84 ± 0.030.98
31JacalinGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T)), GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (Tn))1.51 ± 0.251.55 ± 0.150.971.64 ± 0.041.60 ± 0.091.02
32PNAªGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T))0.68 ± 0.090.36 ± 0.011.86**0.49 ± 0.010.43 ± 0.011.14**
33WFATerminal GalNAc (e.g. GalNAcβ1-4GlcNAc), Galβ1-3(-6)GalNAc0.52 ± 0.050.51 ± 0.021.030.71 ± 0.080.66 ± 0.061.08
34ACAGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T))2.20 ± 0.151.16 ± 0.141.90***0.87 ± 0.070.97 ± 0.050.90
35MPAGal β1-3GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (T)), GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (Tn))0.81 ± 0.080.50 ± 0.021.61**0.71 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.041.08
36HPAα-Linked terminal GalNAc0.89 ± 0.040.43 ± 0.052.08***0.45 ± 0.030.45 ± 0.021.01
37VVAªα-linked terminal GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (Tn), GalNAc α1-3Gal0.55 ± 0.030.44 ± 0.021.24**0.59 ± 0.030.43 ± 0.001.35***
38DBAGalNAc α1-3GalNAc (Blood group A), GalNAc α1-3GalNAc0.41 ± 0.040.34 ± 0.011.21*0.46 ± 0.010.46 ± 0.011.00
39SBAα or β-linked terminal GalNAc, GalNAc α1-3Gal0.56 ± 0.060.51 ± 0.051.100.78 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.021.18**
40CalsepaªHigh Man (Man2-6), N-glycans including bisecting GlcNAc0.79 ± 0.050.66 ± 0.021.21*0.80 ± 0.050.67 ± 0.021.20*
41PTL-Iα-Linked terminal GalNAc0.48 ± 0.030.53 ± 0.050.920.59 ± 0.040.50 ± 0.021.17*
42MAHSia α2-3Gal β1-3(Sia α2-6) GalNAc0.37 ± 0.030.49 ± 0.040.76*0.53 ± 0.020.50 ± 0.021.05
43WGAª(GlcNAcβ1-4)n, NeuAc, multivalent Sia1.32 ± 0.091.52 ± 0.070.87*1.39 ± 0.021.48 ± 0.030.93**
44GSL-IA4 α-GalNAc (α-Thr/Ser (Tn))0.53 ± 0.060.43 ± 0.031.220.70 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.021.11**
45GSL-IB4ªα-Gal0.75 ± 0.020.55 ± 0.031.35***0.69 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.021.11**

aSignificantly changed in two experiments; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

Lectin array analysis of SP cells and MP cells. a Relative intensities of 45 lectins in SP cells compared with MP cells for two experiments. b Fluorescence intensities of SP cells (up) and MP cells (down) Variation of <span class="Chemical">glycans determined by lectin microarray analysis of SP cells and MP cells aSignificantly changed in two experiments; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 Among <span class="Chemical">O-glycan binding lectins, signal intensity of <span class="Chemical">ABA, PNA, VVA, SBA, GSL-IA4, and GSL-IB4 were higher in SP cells, indicating a higher expression of Tn (GalNAc-Ser/Thr), T (Galβ1-3 GalNAc-Ser/Thr), and sT (sialyl-T) antigens in these cells. Among these lectins, intensities of ABA, VVA, which recognize T, sT and Tn antigens, were the highest in two experiments, respectively. ABA, PNA, VVA, GSL-IB4differed significantly in the two experiments. In contrast, SP cells exhibited a significantly lower intensities for (Gal β1-4GlcNAc)n (poly LacNAc) (LEL) and multivalent sialyl glycan binders (WGA). Among <span class="Chemical">N-glycans, SP cells showed significantly stronger intensity of fucosylation binder AAL, which recognizes the core fucose (Fuc) and Lewis X structure. A higher intensity for AOL, which recognizes both core Fuc and Fuc α1-2 (galactoside β1-4) n-acetylglucosamine (Fuc α1-2(Gal β1-4) GlcNAc), was also observed in SP cells. However, SP cells exhibited relatively weak intensity to UEA-I, which recognizes Fuc α1-2(Gal β1-4) GlcNAc. These results together indicated that core fucosylation glycans were increased in SP cells. In addition, the signal for α2-3 linked sialic acids (Sia) binders (MAL) was significantly decreased in SP cells.

MS analysis of the N-glycan profiles of SP cells and MP cells

To obtain more detailed information about the <span class="Chemical">N-glycan structures and their relative intensities, we compared <span class="Chemical">N-glycan profile of the whole proteome of SP cells and MP cells using MS. Twenty-five N-glycans were detected of both cell populations, and were shown in Fig. 3. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the quantitative differences in glycans between SP and MP cells. A comparison based on different classes (high mannose, hybrid, and complex) were shown in Fig. 4. The relative intensities of each corresponding structure were analyzed by the method above and presented in Table 2.
Fig. 3

MS spectra of SP cells and MP cells. a, b The spectra from m/z 1250 to m/z 2400 of SP cells (up) and MP (down). Int % of each peak means the relative ion intensity and stand for the ratio of each oligosaccharides’ intensity to the intensity of the highest oligosaccharides

Fig. 4

Relative quantities of different classes of N-glycans in SP cells and MP cells. a Comparison of the relative quantities of each structure on SP cells and MP cell. The relative quantity of each structure was stand for the proportion of each structure relative intensity in total intensity of all 25 structures. b Comparison of the different classes of glycans using a pie chart: the inner circle represents SP cells, and the outer circle represents MP cells. c The expression of Fut8 was analysed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Table 2

Relative intensities of proposed N-glycan structures in SP cells and MP cell

No.TypeOberserved m/z (M ± Na)Proposed structureSP relative intensitymean (n = 5)RSD (%)MP relative intensitymean (n = 5)RSD (%)Ratio SP/MPChange (SP/MP)Composition
1High mannose1257.5 0.12357.830.15387.360.80**DownH5N2
21419.6 0.30514.160.30542.631.00UpH6N2
31581.7 0.13624.940.13045.191.04UpH7N2
41743.8 0.16415.430.15452.611.06UpH8N2
51905.8 0.038210.920.03199.081.20*UpH9N2
62067.9 0.004326.100.002412.271.74**UpG1H9N2
72229.9 0.000737.670.000541.181.45UpG2H9N2
8Hybrid1282.5 0.037215.050.035012.521.06UpH3N3F1
91298.6 0.030811.240.03309.100.93DownH4N3
101444.6 0.010826.900.01278.190.85DownH4N3F1
111460.8 0.016532.280.031612.450.52**DownH5N3
121622.7 0.009226.980.010722.170.86DownH6N3
13Complex1339.6 0.033926.800.036637.170.93DownH3N4
141485.6 0.021924.140.01364.331.61**UpH3N4F1
151501.6 0.011014.540.008211.881.35*UpH4N4
161542.6 Or 0.02193.770.013610.591.61***UpH3N5
171647.7 0.005821.470.004720.871.22UpH4N4F1
181688.7 Or 0.004321.630.002139.722.04**UpH3N5F1
191704.7 Or 0.007916.730.00417.031.90**UpH4N5
201809.8 0.011014.700.011020.011.01UpH5N4F1
211850.8 Or 0.001156.440.000727.401.49UpH4N5F1
221866.8 0.002420.340.001347.411.91*UpH5N5
232012.9 0.001046.150.000851.521.38UpH5N5F1
242175.0 0.000826.050.000833.001.02UpH6N5F1
252377.1 0.000552.380.000534.800.90DownH6N6F1

Values of relative intensity mean represent mean of 5 replicates; symbols for proposed structures: GlcNAc, , Man, , Glc, , Fuc, , Gal,

H hexose, N N-acetyl hexosamine, F fucose, G glucose

MS spectra of SP cells and MP cells. a, b The spectra from m/z 1250 to m/z 2400 of SP cells (up) and MP (down). Int % of each peak means the relative ion intensity and stand for the ratio of each <span class="Chemical">oligosaccharides’ intensity to the intensity of the highest <span class="Chemical">oligosaccharides Relative quantities of different classes of <span class="Chemical">N-glycans in SP cells and MP cells. a Comparison of the relative quantities of each structure on SP cells and MP cell. The relative quantity of each structure was stand for the proportion of each structure relative intensity in total intensity of all 25 structures. b Comparison of the different classes of glycans using a pie chart: the inner circle represents SP cells, and the outer circle represents MP cells. c The expression of Fut8 was analysed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR Relative intensities of proposed <span class="Chemical">N-glycan structures in SP cells and MP cell Values of relative intensity mean represent mean of 5 replicates; symbols for proposed structures: <span class="Chemical">GlcNAc, , Man, , <span class="Chemical">Glc, , Fuc, , Gal, <span class="Chemical">H hexose, <span class="Chemical">N N-acetyl hexosamine, F fucose, G glucose We ob<span class="Chemical">served that the proportion of high <span class="Chemical">mannose type glycan was nearly identical in SP cells (77.21%) and MP cells (77.90%). Signal of m/z 2067.9 was significantly higher (p < 0.01, fold change >1.5) in SP cells. In addition, the proportion of hybrid type N-glycan was obviously decreased in SP cells as compared with MP cells (10.44 vs. 12.30%). Most hybrid N-glycans were reduced in SP cells, 1460.8 was significantly decreased (p < 0.01, fold change <0.67) in SP cells. However, the percentage of complex N-glycans ranging from m/z 1200 to m/z 2400 was slightly increased in SP cells (12.35 vs. 9.79%). Among complex N-glycans, core fucosylated N-glycans, catalyzed by fucosyltransferase-8 (FUT8), were also higher in SP cells (4.64 vs. 3.42%), and m/z 1485.6 and m/z 1688.7 were also significantly higher (p < 0.01, fold change >1.5). These results correlated well with the lectin array results (Fig. 2). Moreover, real-time PCR was performed to further verify that SP cells expressed a higher level of FUT8-encoding gene Fut8 at mRNA level.

SP cells exhibit higher signal intensity for ABA and VVA

Lectin array analysis indicated that SP cells expressed more <span class="Disease">tumor-associated antigens which strongly bound to the lectins <span class="Chemical">ABA and VVA. Among all 45 lectins, ABA, which can recognize both T and sT antigens, exhibited the strongest intensity for SP cells. VVA, which can recognize Tn antigen, also displayed significantly higher intensity for SP cells. Hence, we performed lectin blots to compare recognition of ABA and VVA between SP and MP cells. SP cells exhibited higher intensity for both lectins. For ABA, intensity of glycoprotein from 70–180 kDa was higher in SP cells. For VVA, glycoprotein from 50–80 kDa showed stronger intensity in SP cells (Fig. 5a). These differences were further verified by real-time PCR. C1GALT1 (core 1 synthase, glycoprotein-N-acetylgalactosamine 3-beta-galactosyltransferase 1), which acts on Tn to form a T antigen, was increased in SP cells at mRNA level. ST3Gal1 (ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 1), which can modify T antigens to form sT, was also enhanced in SP cells (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5

SP cellsexhibited higher intensity of ABA and VVA. a Lectin blots were used to detect the expression of the Tn (VVA, right), T and ST (ABA, left) antigens on SP cells and MP cells, β-actin was performed as control; b the mRNA expression levels of C1galt, which acts on Tn to form T antigen, and St3gal1, which forms ST antigen from T, were determined by real-time PCR. c, d The intensity of ABA and VVA for SP sphere cells after culturing for 5 weeks without serum was detected by flow cytometry and quantified

SP cellsexhibited higher intensity of <span class="Chemical">ABA and VVA. a Lectin blots were used to detect the expression of the Tn (VVA, right), T and ST (<span class="Chemical">ABA, left) antigens on SP cells and MP cells, β-actin was performed as control; b the mRNA expression levels of C1galt, which acts on Tn to form T antigen, and St3gal1, which forms ST antigen from T, were determined by real-time PCR. c, d The intensity of ABA and VVA for SP sphere cells after culturing for 5 weeks without serum was detected by flow cytometry and quantified To investigate whether the SP cells continued to display enhanced binding for <span class="Chemical">ABA and VVA during proliferation, we detected the intensity of <span class="Chemical">ABA and VVA for MP and SP sphere cells after 5 weeks’ culture. Both ABA and VVA continued to strongly bind to SP cells, indicating that these lectins might be potential markers of ovarian cancer SP cells (Fig. 5c, d).

Discussion

Glycosylation plays important roles in many physiological and pathological processes as well as the identity and function of CSCs. However, the small population size of CSCs has hindered the characterization of <span class="Chemical">glycans released from CSCs. Thus, we used lectin arrays to characterize the entire glycome of CSCs, both <span class="Chemical">N-glycans and O-glycans. Lectin array is time saving (1-day operation), requires small amount of cells (lower limit of 1000 cells). And it can analyze intact glycoproteins, which simplified sample preparation and made detection of sialic acid easy. We also used MS to characterize the structure of N-glycans and provide information about the composition of the N-glycome. Combination of these two methods provided more comprehensive information about glycans in ovarian CSCs. In this study, we didn’t conduct MS analysis of O-glycans, because it needs 106–107 cells at least for analysis [24], and it was difficult to enrich enough HO8910 pm SP cells. New methods or technologies are still needed to overcome these obstacles. Our present study suggested that SP cells may overexpress the <span class="Disease">tumor-associated antigens, T, Tn, and sT. The lectin arrays revealed enhanced intensity of VVA, <span class="Chemical">SBA, and GSL-IA lectins in SP cells, which implied Tn antigen overexpession in SP cells. Increased expression of C1GALT1 and signal intensity of ABA and PNA lectins in SP cells suggested upregulation of T antigen. Besides, T antigens were modified by ST3Gal1, which was enhanced in SP cells, to form sT antigen recognized by ABA lectin. Our lectin blot results also confirmed stronger intensity of ABA, VVA for SP cells. Furthermore, after 5 weeks’ culture without serum, the SP sphere cells still displayed higher intensity of ABA and VVA compared with MP cells, indicating that the expression of these antigens continued during CSC proliferation. To further verify whether these changes were only HO8910 pm cell line specific, we used another ovarian cancer cell line ES-2 for SP cell sorting and validated that ES-2 SP cells also showed higher intensity of ABA and VVA than ES-2 MP cells (see Additional file 1). In our MS analysis, <span class="Chemical">glycans with terminal <span class="Chemical">Glcs (glucose), which are usually related to glycoprotein quality control [25, 26] and exhibit higher expression in cancer [27, 28], were expressed more abundantly in SP cells. Increased hybrid N-glycans were detected in MP cells, indicating that the immediate products of GlcNAc transferase I were not further modified by other GlcNAc transferases. Among more mature N-glycans, core fucosylation N-glycans were more abundant in SP cells, as verified by MS and lectin array. The mRNA transcript level of FUT8, which synthesises the core fucosylation, was also enhanced. Increased core fucose is closely associated with many types of cancer. It showed an unfavourable clinical outcome and played as a functional regulator of non-small cell lung cancer [29, 30]. Loss of FUT8 also down-regulates several cellular signaling pathways to inhibit chemical-induced hepatocellular carcinoma [31]. The common available biomarkers of <span class="Disease">ovarian CSCs are ALDH, <span class="Gene">CD133+, CD24+ CD44+, CD44+ CD117+ and negative Hoechst 33342 stain. The use of a single marker has disadvantages because not all cancer cell lines or tissues are positive for the marker and the cells enriched for a marker maybe not purified. In addition, ALDH, CD133, CD44, and CD177 are also expressed in normal stem cells. Thus, new biomarkers are still needed, and glycans may provide a breakthrough. This study implied higher levels of Tn, T and sT antigens in <span class="Disease">ovarian cancer SP cells. Tn, T and sT antigens are weakly expressed in normal tissues but overexpressed in most <span class="Species">human carcinomas and are associated with poor prognosis [32-34]. A recent review by Karsten and Goletz [19] hypothesized that T antigen might be a potential biomarker of CSCs. Because this antigen is only expressed in onco-foetal stem cells and tumor cells, targeting T antigen should not harm normal adult stem cells. Lin et al. also confirmed the co-expression of T antigen with the stem cell markers CD44 and CD133 in lung, breast and liver cancer [35]. Our results are similar to those of previous lectin studies of CSCs. In <span class="Disease">glioblastoma, lectins recognizing <span class="Chemical">GalNAc and GlcNAc exhibit higher affinity for the surface of undifferentiated cells, suggesting that GalNAc and GlcNAc might be a novel biomarker to identify CSCs [19]. In the same study, the lectins PNA, GSL-I, SBA, and VVA also exhibited higher signals in CSCs. In pancreatic CSCs, Terao et al. observed enhanced ABA and VVA intensity of CSCs using the same lectin array [36]. In addition, liver CSCs isolated as CD133+CD13+cells also exhibited stronger intensities of SNA, SSA, ABA, PNA, and SBA [18]. Based on the results of the present study and previous reports, we hypothesize that <span class="Disease">tumor-associated <span class="Chemical">glycan antigens may be novel potential CSC markers. Future studies should examine whether lectin ABA combined with available markers can isolate more malignant CSCs.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we conducted a systematic glycomic analysis of <span class="Disease">ovarian cancer SP cells using lectin arrays and MS. Our findings suggested that SP cells expressed increased core <span class="Chemical">fucose, Tn, T and sT antigens. In addition, hybrid type, α2,3-linked sialic glycan, and multivalent sialyl-glycan were enhanced in MP cells. Aberrant glycan profiles may be related to some stemness properties of SP cells and may provide potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer CSCs (all lectins in the array: see Additional file 2).
  36 in total

1.  Expression of CD176 (Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen) on lung, breast and liver cancer-initiating cells.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Lin; Uwe Karsten; Steffen Goletz; Ruo-Chuan Cheng; Yi Cao
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Epithelial ovarian cancer: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  E E Partridge; M N Barnes
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Quantitative O-Glycomics by Microwave-Assisted β-Elimination in the Presence of Pyrazolone Analogues.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Furukawa; Jinhua Piao; Yasunobu Yoshida; Kazue Okada; Ikuko Yokota; Kenichi Higashino; Nobuo Sakairi; Yasuro Shinohara
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Ovarian cancer development and metastasis.

Authors:  Ernst Lengyel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Combination use of anti-CD133 antibody and SSA lectin can effectively enrich cells with high tumorigenicity.

Authors:  Kenta Moriwaki; Kumiko Okudo; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Shunsaku Takeishi; Hiromichi Sawaki; Hisashi Narimatsu; Masahiro Tanemura; Hideshi Ishii; Masaki Mori; Eiji Miyoshi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Glycosylation-dependent lectin-receptor interactions preserve angiogenesis in anti-VEGF refractory tumors.

Authors:  Diego O Croci; Juan P Cerliani; Tomas Dalotto-Moreno; Santiago P Méndez-Huergo; Ivan D Mascanfroni; Sebastián Dergan-Dylon; Marta A Toscano; Julio J Caramelo; Juan J García-Vallejo; Jing Ouyang; Enrique A Mesri; Melissa R Junttila; Carlos Bais; Margaret A Shipp; Mariana Salatino; Gabriel A Rabinovich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Focused glycomic analysis of the N-linked glycan biosynthetic pathway in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Karen L Abbott; Alison V Nairn; Erica M Hall; Marc B Horton; John F McDonald; Kelley W Moremen; Daniela M Dinulescu; Michael Pierce
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  High-throughput profiling of protein N-glycosylation by MALDI-TOF-MS employing linkage-specific sialic acid esterification.

Authors:  Karli R Reiding; Dennis Blank; Dennis M Kuijper; André M Deelder; Manfred Wuhrer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Role of malectin in Glc(2)Man(9)GlcNAc(2)-dependent quality control of α1-antitrypsin.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Dan Hu; Rikio Yabe; Hiroaki Tateno; Sheng-Ying Qin; Naoki Matsumoto; Jun Hirabayashi; Kazuo Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Developing ovarian cancer stem cell models: laying the pipeline from discovery to clinical intervention.

Authors:  Brendan Ffrench; Claudia Gasch; John J O'Leary; Michael F Gallagher
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  6 in total

1.  Targeting BCRP/ABCG2 by RNA interference enhances the chemotherapy sensitivity of human colon cancer side population cells.

Authors:  Jun Hu; Jian Li; Xin Yue; Jia-Cang Wang; Jun-Feng Wang; Jian-Zhong Liu; Da-Lu Kong
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-11

2.  Lectin array and glycogene expression analyses of ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and its cisplatin-resistant derivate cell line A2780-cp.

Authors:  Yisheng Wang; Congjian Xu; Ran Zhao; Wenjun Qin; Ruihuan Qin; Jing Han; Can Li
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.988

3.  Aided Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Serum Fucosylated Haptoglobin Ratios.

Authors:  Shuxin Shang; Wei Li; Xue Qin; Shu Zhang; Yinkun Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  An Extract of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) Mediates Potent Inhibitory Actions on Metastatic and Cancer Stem Cells by Tumor Cell-Autonomous and Immune-Dependent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Namita Kundu; Xinrong Ma; Stephen Hoag; Fang Wang; Ahmed Ibrahim; Raquel Godoy-Ruiz; David J Weber; Amy M Fulton
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-27

Review 5.  Application of Lectin Microarrays for Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Kai Dang; Wenjuan Zhang; Shanfeng Jiang; Xiao Lin; Airong Qian
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.911

6.  Glycan signatures for the identification of cisplatin-resistant testicular cancer cell lines: Specific glycoprofiling of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).

Authors:  Michal Hires; Eduard Jane; Katarina Kalavska; Michal Chovanec; Michal Mego; Peter Kasak; Tomas Bertok; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.