Literature DB >> 27832922

Current regulatory arrangements for assisted conception treatment in European countries.

Luca Gianaroli1, Anna Pia Ferraretti2, Maria Cristina Magli2, Serena Sgargi2.   

Abstract

Infertility is a condition affecting an increasing number of individuals all over the world. In recent years, this phenomenon has spread across both western countries and developing countries, thus developing the features of a pandemic. For this reason, the World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledged that infertility should be considered a disease to all intents and purposes, as it diminishes the health and wellbeing of the individuals who suffers from it. At present, the most effective means to contain the spread of infertility are essentially prevention and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). With reference to the latter, although most of these techniques are routinely used in the majority of countries, they are still subject to medical, ethical and political debates. There are huge variations noted when the regulatory legislation adopted by different countries to govern infertility treatment in various countries all over the world are reviewed. In fact, it has to be recognized that ART legislation depends on a variety of factors, such as social structure, political choices, ethical issues and religious beliefs. This makes it apparently impossible to create a standard regulation for different countries, especially in case of controversial issues like gamete and embryo donation, embryo cryopreservation or surrogacy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to treatments; Assisted conception treatments; Cross border reproductive care; IVF legislation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832922     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  Fertility care in the era of commercial direct-to-consumer home DNA kits: issues to ponder.

Authors:  Keren Rotshenker-Olshinka; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Availability, effectiveness and safety of ART in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barend Botha; Delva Shamley; Silke Dyer
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-03-26

3.  Attitudes towards embryo donation among healthcare professionals working in child healthcare: a survey study.

Authors:  Gabriela Armuand; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  ART in Europe, 2015: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.

Authors:  C De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; C Wyns; E Mocanu; T Motrenko; G Scaravelli; J Smeenk; S Vidakovic; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-02-24

Review 5.  Use of in vitro fertilization-ethical issues.

Authors:  Kjell Asplund
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?

Authors:  Giulia Cavaliere
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-06

7.  Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti; Federico Cirillo; Raffaella De Cesare; Emanuela Morenghi; Valentina Canevisio; Camilla Ronchetti; Annamaria Baggiani; Antonella Smeraldi; Elena Albani; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.