Literature DB >> 2783273

The diagnosis of splenic lymphoma by MR imaging: value of superparamagnetic iron oxide.

R Weissleder1, G Elizondo, D D Stark, P F Hahn, J Marfil, J F Gonzalez, S Saini, L E Todd, J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate superparamagnetic iron oxide (AMI-25) as a contrast agent for MR to distinguish normal spleens from those diffusely infiltrated by lymphoma. As diffuse splenic involvement lacks visible tumor-tissue boundaries, signal-intensity measurements of spleens were used as a diagnostic criterion in 33 patients (lymphoma, n = 8; benign splenomegaly, n = 5; normal subjects, n = 20). Unenhanced MR images were insensitive (four of eight patients) and nonspecific (20 of 25 patients) in the diagnosis of lymphoma. After injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide (40 mumol Fe/kg), lymphomatous spleens showed a significantly higher signal intensity (p less than .05) than did normal spleens or spleens enlarged by benign disease (hepatic cirrhosis, n = 4; spherocytosis, n = 1). Changes in splenic MR signal intensity unambiguously identified eight of eight lymphomatous spleens and 25 of 25 normal or enlarged spleens that did not contain lymphoma. Phagocytosis of superparamagnetic iron oxide in lymphomatous spleens is reduced because of diffuse displacement of splenic macrophages by lymphoma cells and/or by immunologic suppression of macrophage activity. Our results suggest that superparamagnetic iron oxide (AMI-25) can improve the accuracy of MR imaging in the diagnosis of splenic lymphoma. With further development, this noninvasive technique may reduce the need for diagnostic splenectomy in lymphoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783273     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

Review 1.  Computerised tomography in the staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Sarah J Vinnicombe; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Jason R McCarthy; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Magnetic nanoparticles and their applications in image-guided drug delivery.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Yu; Jinho Park; Sangyong Jon
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Diagnosis of diffuse spleen involvement in haematological malignancies using a spleen-to-liver attenuation ratio on contrast-enhanced CT images.

Authors:  Christian Philipp Reinert; Clemens Hinterleitner; Jan Fritz; Konstantin Nikolaou; Marius Horger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging enhanced with superparamagnetic nanoparticles measures macrophage burden in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Kunio Morishige; Daniel F Kacher; Peter Libby; Lee Josephson; Peter Ganz; Ralph Weissleder; Masanori Aikawa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Magnetic Nanoparticles for Early Detection of Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Wenbin Lin; Taeghwan Hyeon; Gregory M Lanza; Miqin Zhang; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  MRS Bull       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.578

Review 7.  Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging.

Authors:  Omid Veiseh; Jonathan W Gunn; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  MRI manifestations of gastrointestinal lymphoma.

Authors:  C K Chou; L T Chen; R S Sheu; C W Yang; M L Wang; T S Jaw; G C Liu
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Applications of nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of cancer.

Authors:  S C Baetke; T Lammers; F Kiessling
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop?

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Marianne E Mertens; Jan Grimm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.